Blog

  • The iPad May Kill the Kindle, But Amazon Could Still Come Out Ahead: The Only Comparison You Need to Read

    World Wide Wade
    Wade Roush wrote:

    If you’re interested in the electronic book craze, but you don’t yet own an e-book reading device, your options just got a lot more complicated. Not only are there a handful of great devices that use electrophoretic screens from Cambridge, MA-based E Ink, such as the Amazon Kindle, the Barnes & Noble Nook, and the Sony Reader Daily Edition; now there’s also the Apple iPad, for which there are at least 400 book-related apps, notably Apple’s own iBooks and a superb Kindle app from Amazon. What’s a reader to do?

    I could go on for screens and screens about the relative merits of the iPad and the E Ink devices—and I will. But let me cut to the chase. It pains me a little to say it—and it will certainly pain Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and Sony—but if you haven’t already bought a Kindle-style device, don’t. You’d be far better off saving up your cash and buying an iPad, even though the low-end iPad, at $499, is almost twice as expensive as the Kindle and the Nook, which cost $259.

    Why? Because the iPad offers not only the best e-book reading experience available, but can do thousands of other amazing things too. The Kindle, even if it does connect with Facebook and Twitter now, is just a Kindle.

    Now, I’m still a devoted Kindle fan. And even though my own Kindle has probably been feeling neglected since I brought home my iPad on April 3, I want to make it clear that I don’t think current Kindle owners should feel remorseful about their purchases. The Kindle has its advantages and may still be the better choice for some people.

    But the simple fact is that the iPad really is almost as magical as Steve Jobs promised it would be, at least in my opinion. It accomplishes the main goal of any handheld e-book device—breaking digital text free of its former imprisonment on the screens of desktop and laptop PCs and presenting it in a more portable, book-like form—while performing quite a few other tricks in the bargain. I don’t think the iPad and the other tablet devices coming behind it will completely kill off the E Ink devices, but it will severely limit their market.

    I’m going to run through the a list of areas where the iPad clearly outshines the Kindle, and then I’m going to talk about a couple of ways in which the Kindle still beats the iPad. I think that most of what I’m going to say about the Kindle applies to the other E Ink devices too, but I haven’t spent as much time with the Sony or Barnes & Noble e-readers, so I won’t make any strong claims about them. The bottom line is that Amazon should probably concentrate on marketing e-book content, because there’s no way it can compete with Apple’s hardware.

    1. The Screen.

    No contest here. The iPad’s screen is obviously larger than the Kindle’s—45 square inches for Apple’s gadget, compared to 17 square inches for Amazon’s—but it’s also got a) color b) animation c) multi-touch. When you download Apple’s iBooks app, you get a free copy of A.A. Milne’s 1926 classic Winnie-the-Pooh, including Ernest H. Shepherd’s original color illustrations, which is quite canny of Apple, because the book shows off the brilliant LCD screen (and is also sure to prompt the children of iPad owners to demand more e-books). Placed next to an iPad, the Kindle looks rather sad. It’s just fine for monochrome graphics—in fact, its electronic-ink screen has a higher effective resolution than the iPad’s—but let’s face it, even the New York Times gave up on black-and-white back in the ’90s.

    If your platform has a color screen powered by a speedy graphics chip, that means you can enhance your e-books with video and animation (more on that below). And when you combine animation with a touchscreen, the reading interface itself can be brought to life. On a Kindle, you advance through a book by clicking a physical “next page” button. But on the iPad, you sweep your finger across the page, in a motion that’s pretty much the same as …Next Page »

    UNDERWRITERS AND PARTNERS



























  • 2010-04-30 Spike activity

    Quick links from the past week in mind and brain news:

    You could not ask for a better combination. Coverage of the mirror movement mutation in a piece from Not Exactly Rocket Science and an article on Neurophilosophy.

    The Independent covers the frankly mind-bending news that David Cronenberg is to make a film on the relationship between Freud and Jung with Keira Knightley playing Jung’s lover. I would have gone for Bruckheimer for director myself.

    Fantastic research on whether it is best to knap at your desk or in bed covered by the BPS Research Digest. Why can’t we have more research like this? An evidence-based approach on the best day to chuck a sickie is sorely needed.

    The Psychologist has an excellent article on the ‘impostor syndrome‘ with some fantastic detective work which sheds some new light on the idea.

    That’s it. The Matrix is here. Mind boggling video from BoingBoing. Red pills at the ready.

    New Jersey Magazine reporter Mara Altman volunteers for a study on female orgasm in the brain scanner.

    There’s coverage of an odd decision by the Minnesota Supreme Court that bong water should considered an illegal substance over at the excellent Addiction Inbox.

    New Scientist has an interview with Anil Seth, director of the new Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science.

    There’s an awesome and in-depth post on how three studies now refute the presence of the XMRV virus in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) at Laika’s MedLibLog. See a previous Mind Hacks post for background on this controversial issue.

    NPR has a fantastic brief segment on the discovery of laughing gas and why its pain killing properties were dismissed as unhelpful.

    Should results from studies on suicide be kept out of the media to avoid prompting suicides? asks science writer Mun Keat Looi.

    PBS has what looks like an awesome documentary on behavioural economics that’s only available http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/money/”>online to people in the States. If it was to *cough* appear *cough* as a torrent though it would just be swell.

    Dating by blood type in Japan is covered by BBC News. My blood was tested for the first time in my life the other week. It got an A+. I was very proud.

    Neuroanthropology has an excellent essay about the attraction of negative news stories and the psychology of media fear-mongering.

    What Happened When I Went Undercover at a Christian Gay-to-Straight Conversion Camp. A piece on AlterNet.

    The Smithsonian Magazine have an archive of all their psychology and brain articles.

    Darryl Cunningham’s awesome Psychiatric Tales graphic novel is out, details on his blog.

    Wired notes that the US military has put out a tender for for a system to train soldiers based on their neural and cognitive responses.

    Video from BBC News about a private clinic offering money to addicts to be sterilised – just arrived in the UK. Really quite screwed up.

    BBC News quotes Dr Penelope Leach who says leaving babies to cry ‘harms their brains’. Talking shit apparently not a danger.

    If you think she might have been taken out of context, here she is on YouTube hawking the same nonsense. ‘High cortisol’ apparently the danger. In which case, breast feeding would be ‘harming’ their brains too! No wonder my head hurts.

    Salon has a review of a book on the neuropsychology of wisdom. Interesting, because wisdom is a strangely neglected topic in psychology.

    Why Humans Have Sex. A podcast for the The New York Academy of Sciences oddly fails to mention wanting to check out people’s bookshelves. Maybe that’s just me?

    Popular Science has a gallery of vintage robots. Old and rusty. As they should be.

    Have you seen the Wiring the Brain blog? Bloody fantastic.

    The New York Times publishes several letters responding to their recent article on standards in the US military’s war trauma units.

    The Top 25 Psychiatric Prescriptions for 2009 are over at PsychCentral. Top 10 almost all anxiety and depression drugs. The non-specific malaise golden goose cashes in.

    The New York Times has an intelligent piece by prominent psychiatrist Dan Carlat on the swing of the medication pendulum in American psychiatry.

    A play about the ethics of brain scanning called Interior Traces is currently touring the UK.

  • It’s As If The More Japan’s Ancient Printing Press Keeps Churning, The More Prices Keep Deflating

    Japan Old

    Japanese unemployment has continued to rise, while prices continued to fall according to latest monthly data.

    The nation is also maintaining the same old policy near-zero interest rate policy. The Bank of Japan said they would keep their key policy rate unchanged at 0.1%.

    We probably shouldn’t expect a change from this for a long, long time. Japan has kept the printing press churning for quite some time now, yet prices keep falling, even after the modest economic rebound.

    AP:

    Japan’s seasonally adjusted jobless rate rose to 5 percent in the first increase in five months. The figure is up from 4.9 percent in February and missed Kyodo News agency’s forecast for the rate to be unchanged.

    The number of jobless totaled 3.5 million during the month, up 4.5 percent from a year earlier. Those with jobs fell 0.6 percent to 62.1 million.

    The numbers underscore a patchy recovery facing the world’s second biggest economy — but the slowest growing one in Asia. Robust growth in China and elsewhere in the region is fueling demand for Japanese cars and gadgets. Corporate profits are up, and business confidence is recovering.

    Companies, however, remain cautious about spending. Workers have yet to see a major turnaround in jobs or wages, which managed a small rise in March.

    Japan’s core consumer price index, which excludes prices of fresh food, declined 1.2 percent in March from a year earlier. The result marked the 13th straight month of decline. Prices fell for a swathe of goods from fuel to furniture.

    Lower prices may seem like a good thing, but deflation plagued Japan during its “Lost Decade” in the 1990s. It can hamper economic growth by depressing company profits, sparking wage cuts and causing consumers to postpone purchases. It also can increase debt burdens.

    Core CPI for the Tokyo area, seen as a barometer of future price trends nationwide, retreated 1.9 percent in April.

    Just don’t forget, there’s still potential for Japan to spark hyperinflation out of nowhere. See how a Japanese hyperinflationary scenario would unfold here >

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • No significant warming since 1995 by Neil Henderson

    Article Tags: World Temperatures

    I attended the meeting addressed by Mr Barry Coates of Oxfam on April 23. I consider that many points made by him were incorrect. I will comment on two.

    He claimed the IPCC reports are robust, peer-reviewed documents. A report has just been released by “Citizens Audit Project” that has checked every paper quoted in the 44 chapters of the IPCC’s fourth report. One chapter has only 15 percent of its papers peer reviewed. Twelve have less than 50 percent of their papers peer reviewed. Another 18 chapters have less than 75 percent of the papers peer reviewed.

    Mr Coates claimed the science is settled. Our planet’s climate is very complex, and even the IPCC admits that there are still many unknowns, making this an outrageous claim. But we hear it all too often. Let me list three recent items that detract from the theory that the globe is warming dangerously.

    1. Many scientists, including Phil Jones, a lead author of the IPCC and part of the “Climategate” scandal at East Anglia University, now concede there has been no significant warming since 1995. Mr Coates is wrong when he asserts that the world is warming even faster than the IPCC originally predicted.

    Source: gisborneherald.co.nz

    Read in full with comments »   


  • Is Just Talking About Infringing Content Infringing?

    There are people out there who believe that just talking about the fact that infringing content is out there is infringing itself, but that seems like a plainly ridiculous standard for judging infringing content. Yet, we see cases like this all the time. Recently, there was Twitter taking down a tweet for merely linking to a blog post that talked about a leaked album (but which didn’t link to the leak), and now TorrentFreak points out that the site RLSLOG has been totally taken offline (again) after Universal Music sent a takedown request. The only problem? RLSLOG doesn’t actually host any content or infringe on any copyrights. It’s a news site that talks about infringing content that’s available, but is that infringing itself? It’s difficult to see how anyone would properly judge that to be the case, but it didn’t stop the site’s host from taking them offline thanks to Universal Music’s legal threats.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story





  • Sell Treasuries … Again

    “Shorting US Treasuries is a slam-dunk trade if ever there was one,” our friend Paul Van Eeden wrote not long ago. I agree.

    Treasury yields have been going down along the entire yield curve since 1983. This trend reached a crescendo during the crisis of 2008, when 10-year Treasury yields plunged to 2% and 90-day T-bills paid negative yields.

    For a few moments in the heat of the credit crisis, some investors were so scared of losing money in any other asset; they took a guaranteed loss just to keep their money “safe.” Better to lose 0.1% on a short- term bond, the theory went, than risk losing 50% on GE, Citigroup, GM or Bank of America.

    The US government recognized this insatiable thirst for the “security” of American bonds. And it abused this opportunity to the fullest extent – setting record budget deficits in 2008, 2009, 2010 and likely beyond. Mainstream economists like Paul Krugman, James Galbraith and Dean Baker applaud these deficits as a necessary remedy for economic malaise. They maintain that when consumers can no longer consume and corporations are locked out of the credit markets, the government is the only actor in the economy that can save us all from financial Armageddon.

    Further, they argue that inflation is the devil we know whereas deflation is the devil we don’t want to know. They argue the government is not spending enough money right now, and that those who encourage fiscal restraint and austerity during an economic downturn are only asking for more trouble, more pain.

    Further, they say, it is the government’s responsibility to coax inflation back into the system, which would in turn spur growth in GDP. Then when the economy gets “back on track,” we can deal with the deficits and begin addressing the national debt.

    Trouble is, since the 1980s, we’ve never, but for a few short years in the late 1990s, gotten to the second half of that Keynesian equation. As one reader insightfully observed:

    “Keynesian economics really does (or did) have a legitimate function in a capitalist economy wracked by business cycles. Any honest, solvent government can use Keynesian strategies to good ends when a cycle tanks.

    “The problem, which you guys so rightly observe is that our government is far from solvent; it uses what are called ‘Keynesian’ strategies to mask what Marx would have called ‘internal contradictions’ – and it’s not being honest with itself or its citizens, either. What we see now is not Keynesian – it’s simply consequences of overreach by an empire in decline. It’s not Keynesian at all, just chronic overspending.”

    Following what we feel is a deeply flawed economic strategy, the Obama administration issued over $2 trillion in government bonds – a record, by a long shot.

    Mostly with the help of Asian governments, the Treasury managed to sell them all. But many thanks go to the Federal Reserve itself. Through its program of quantitative easing, the Fed bought billions upon billions of Treasury paper to suppress American mortgage rates and ease the pain of the housing bust.

    This, to put it bluntly, cannot last. The Fed ended quantitative easing on March 30. Mortgage rates have already reached an eight-month high since then.

    But the real threat to the plan to keep rates low may come from outside the Fed’s purview. On January 25, 2010, the Obama administration announced a $6.4 billion arms deal with Taiwan. Two weeks later, the Treasury auctioned $16 billion in 30-year Treasury bonds. The Chinese failed to show up in customary fashion. Yields ticked up from 4.68% to 4.72% by the end of the auction.

    The fear that the Chinese would simply slow their consumption of US debt was all that was needed to drive up rates in the US.

    The worst inflations in history took place when savers and investors lost confidence in the integrity of the currency, while governments handed out purchasing power to entities that did not earn this purchasing power through past production.

    By promising to suppress dollar-based interest rates well into the future, the Fed is giving investors little reason for faith in the dollar. Except for the inherent weakness of the euro, the dollar would already have “exited stage left.”

    The American government cannot continue financing bailouts and future growth with borrowed money. The national debt stands at 90% of annual GDP, the highest since World War II. In the face of looming entitlement disasters like Medicare and Social Security, our debts might grow even larger… but our creditors will assuredly not grow any kinder.

    “We are very concerned about the lack of stability in the US dollar,” Chinese Premier Wen Jaibao said last month. He oversees the biggest cache of US government debt in the world – roughly $889 billion in US Treasuries. As China’s worries grow – along with the rest of the world’s – creditors will demand higher rates of return. Bond yields will go up, prices will go down.

    What’s more, China and many other foreign creditors have historically bought Treasuries in order to suppress the value of their currencies. Now that so many emerging markets have “emerged,” currency suppression isn’t providing the boost that it used to. If inflation becomes a problem in emerging markets, currency suppression will cease to become an objective. This would also remove a major source of demand for Treasuries.

    When will it happen? How bad will it get? We don’t know. But our money says it’ll happen in the next 10 years. Holders of US debt will wish they were holding something – anything – else. Anything but the promise of a fixed stream of steadily debased US dollars. Investors will wish they sold US bonds short when they had the chance.

    So how do you short US bonds without going to the trouble of borrowing them? Fortunately, there’s an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that lets you do just that.

    The ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury ETF (NYSE:TBF) returns the daily inverse of TLT, the Barclays 20+ Year US Treasury Index. The focus is on long-dated bonds – the securities that Treasury will have the most trouble floating if global confidence in US debt wanes.

    In the last half of March, Treasury had a series of lousy auctions. TBF responded just as you’d want it to – rising 2% in just a couple of weeks. This is just the beginning.

    All of that probably makes intuitive sense to you. After all, we’re betting against an investment class that’s gone nowhere but up over the last generation. So don’t be surprised if this asset goes nowhere but down during this generation.

    Addison Wiggin
    for The Daily Reckoning Australia

    Similar Posts:

  • It’s Tough Being Fab

    Poor Fabulous Fab.

    The young Frenchman went to all the right schools in Paris. He must have been good at math, because he got into Stanford. And then, it was onward and upward… He landed a job at Goldman. He was making millions. His girlfriend wrote to say how she’d like to curl up in his arms.

    And then, at the tender age of 31, powee! Right in the kisser.

    His beautiful derivatives lost 85% of its value in just 5 months, his clients get sore and now he’s got a whole posse of senators on his tail.

    The senate torturers didn’t have any idea what Fabulous Fab was up to. They wouldn’t know a derivative contract from a household fusebox. But they knew something had gone wrong. They knew the public was out for blood. And they knew the lights were on and cameras were rolling.

    This was the time to impress the rubes back home. Get some Wall Street hotshot in the dock and grill him hard. And a Frenchman to boot! What luck.

    I-N-D-I-G-N-A-T-I-O-N! The senators were positively shocked…shocked!…to discover that Fab…and Goldman…were out to make money. Maybe they thought the Goldman was a public utility – like Amtrak or the Post Office. Government services don’t work very well, they may have told themselves, but at least they don’t make any money!

    Yes, senators can feign indignation when it is called for. But what are they so indignant about? Well, that’s another matter. Who knows and who cares! The point is, the voters want to see them nail this little Frenchman…and they’re going to make a good show of it.

    The media reports suggest that everyone played along on Tuesday. The senators were indignant. The Goldman fellow denied any wrongdoing…but regretted that had sent the emails out. While the senators pretended indignation, the Frenchman’s regret was certainly sincere. So was his denial. For, in fact, it’s hard to know what he did wrong. Yes, he played his clients for suckers, but so what? That’s what Fab Finance is all about – make money…and then dump the risk onto someone too dumb to know what he’s doing. And then, when he blows up…and the whole system blows up…in come the senators to bail everyone out.

    From Fab’s perspective – and ours – if you can find bankers and hedge funds dim enough to take your derivative contracts – without wondering what is in them – you are performing a public service by separating them from their money. Better for the cash to be in the hands of someone who knows what to do with it – like Fabulous Fab himself.

    But let us imagine that Fabulous Fab gets his hands on some real dough. And let’s imagine that he is not in the mood to gamble on his own jackass derivatives…or to find some chump to sell them to.

    What would he do with the money?

    Ah…here, he would have to close his newspaper and turn off his television and think deeply about what is actually going on in the world. Forget the circus surrounding Goldman. Forget the news flow. Forget even the ‘information’ coming from the markets.

    Now, it’s time to think. This is real money we’re talking about…not just casino chips.

    Fab is no dope. He’d probably look at what is happening with Greek debt…and he’d be suspicious of all government bonds. After all, Greece’s finances are not so different from a half-dozen other countries – including the US of A. True, Greece’s debt problems have investors running to the relative safety of the US…which lowers borrowing costs for the US and makes it easier for the feds to finance their debt.

    But the problem of too much public debt can’t be solved by low interest rates and more debt. Eventually, the US runs into the same problem the Greeks face now. Only the US problem is even bigger…and there is no bigger, richer nation to bail it out.

    Fab figures all of that out… He figures US lending rates may go down in the short run, but in the long run, the feds face the same predicament – they need to borrow more and more money just to keep the show on the road. And eventually, lenders will want higher interest rates. And it won’t be too long before Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s take a hard look at America’s balance sheet too.

    The news yesterday was that the rating agencies may downgrade Spain, Portugal, and Ireland even further. And Reuters reported that the Greek debt alone would cost bondholders $265 million – if Greece has to reschedule (that is, if Greece defaults on its loans).

    Greece now. Then Spain. Then Ireland. Then Britain. Then America.

    And more thoughts:

    Our “Crash Alert” flag is still flying. It’s been up there for so long it’s gotten a bit faded and tattered. But we leave it up; we never know when we will need it.

    The Dow bounced yesterday – up 53 points after taking a big fall on Tuesday. Gold rose $9…and seems, once again, to be readying for a move on the $1,200 level.

    Which brings us back to Fabulous Fab. What would he do if he had some really big money? Would he buy stocks? If he’s smart he’d stay away from them. This market could crack at any time. Stocks are cheap. And there are too many threats coming from too many different directions compared to the limited upside potential.

    Would he buy bonds? Nope…bonds could surprise us all as de-leveraging resumes in earnest. They could be the only thing that resists a general turn-down in asset prices.

    But who’s going to bet on a depression? Not Fabulous Fab. If he had big money, he’d just want to park some money safely…not gamble on the outside chance of a deeper slump. So what does he do?

    He buys gold. That is why gold continues to creep up. The big money wants to protect itself. And it’s getting wary of government debt.

    *** What’s going on in Arizona? The state legislature has passed a law that allows the police to stop anyone on the street and ask him for his papers. If his papers are not in order, the fellow is in trouble.

    The idea is to discourage illegal immigrants.

    Here at The Daily Reckoning our views on immigration are about as unpopular as our views on everything else. We listen to CNN en Espagnol in the morning. From what we can tell, immigrants from across the border are doing the country a big service. And illegal immigrants are the best kind. They work cheap. They stay out of trouble. They use few public services. And they don’t vote. What’s more, they know how to dance.

    If we were all illegal immigrants, the country would have a much healthier economy. Labor rates would fall to levels where we could compete with other exporters. Social costs – food stamps, unemployment compensation, social security, medicare/aid – would drop. And non- voters couldn’t demand more bread and circuses from the legislature (currently, 47% of voters pay no taxes…)

    Meanwhile, our old friend Jim Davidson thinks he’s spotted a new trend. For the first time ever, he says, immigration – legal or illegal – is not a problem:

    “Note that according to the Center for Immigration Studies, a think tank that agitates for tighter border controls, the number of illegal immigrants living in the United States declined to 11 million in 2008 from 12.5 million in 2007. For the first time since the depths of the Great Depression in the early 1930s, more persons appear to have left the US than moved in.”

    This is typical of a nation in decline, says Jim. It’s what happened to Great Britain after it lost its empire.

    And now, there’s a new phenomenon: the illegal EMIGRANT.

    First this news item from The New York Times:

    WASHINGTON – Amid mounting frustration over taxation and banking problems, small but growing numbers of overseas Americans are taking the weighty step of renouncing their citizenship.

    The Federal Register, the government publication that records such decisions, shows that 502 expatriates gave up their US citizenship or permanent residency status in the last quarter of 2009. That is a tiny portion of the 5.2 million Americans estimated by the State Department to be living abroad.

    Still, 502 was the largest quarterly figure in years, more than twice the total for all of 2008, and it looms larger, given how agonizing the decision can be. There were 235 renunciations in 2008 and 743 last year. Waiting periods to meet with consular officers to formalize renunciations have grown.

    It is not easy to renounce your citizenship. If you are wealthy, the costs can be very high, as the feds try to punish you for leaving. Davidson comments:

    Just as there are “illegal immigrants” to the United States, so there are also now growing numbers of “illegal emigrants” from the United States. While statistics are necessarily sketchy, evidence suggests that there has been a dramatic upsurge in the number of US persons living abroad. According to the Association of Americans Resident Overseas, (AARO) apart from the military and other US government employees, 5.26 million US citizens reside abroad, a 67 percent increase since 2008. “Among the benefits the study cites of a life abroad are statistics that show expats earn more, pay less tax, have a better work/life balance, have an improved quality of life, enjoy broader cultural opportunities, and enjoy better job prospects.”

    In the opinion of the US State Department the AARO estimate is 25% too low. The State Department suggests that about 1.34 million Americans have become “illegal emigrants,” which is to say that they have gone abroad and “fallen off the radar.” As one report stated, “If an American living abroad stops paying their taxes, stops visiting the US, stops using embassy or consulate services they will not be OFFICIALLY counted anymore.”

    Regards,

    Bill Bonner
    for The Daily Reckoning Australia

    Similar Posts:

  • Rent Seeking in Canberra

    A world built on debt does not have a solid foundation. A world built on sound money, secure private property, and a predictable rule of law DOES have a solid foundation (as our new friend Ron Kitching pointed out earlier this week). We do not live a world with solid financial foundations. That’s what makes investing so dangerous today.

    Later in today’s Daily Reckoning we’re going to reject the heinous and misguided accusation of doom-mongering levied against us via a profanity laced e-mail tirade. But first, to the markets and the local scene. And there’s some catching up to do on one of those shaky, debt-based pillars of Australian financial life, the housing market.

    First up is the news that mortgage lending is falling while house prices continue to rise. “Total mortgage applications fell 15 per cent in March quarter compared with the corresponding period a year earlier, the quarterly consumer credit demand index by consumer credit check company Veda Advantage showed,” according to today’ Age.

    Cris Cration of Veda said, “One consequence of a withdrawal in government incentives is a relatively sharp drop off in housing credit demand in 2010.” Those “incentives” are the first home buyer’s grants. Mortgage data provider Australian Finance Group says first home buyers have declined as a percentage of the new mortgage market from 28% last year to 10% this year.

    Once you bring forward all that demand…what then? You get now. Let us call it the “demand gap!” People who would have otherwise patiently built up a deposit and bought a home at a time that suited their finances are “brought forward” like reinforcements into the battle line. So who is going to get shot?

    Well, let’s say you got yourself a mortgage six months ago when the RBA lowered the cash rate to 3%. The standard variable rate from any of the Big Four banks would have been higher than that. But let’s say you want to refinance today (because you believe rates are rising) into a 15-year fixed rate mortgage. According to the rates at one major bank site we checked, the rate on a 15-year fixed mortgage is about 8.54%.

    So, if you’re a first home buyer worried about an interest rate shock from rising rates and you want to lock in some stability, we reckon you’re likely to pay nearly double the rate you got into your mortgage. And that would probably be pretty stressful. Of course if you think interest rates are not going up, then you wouldn’t refinance and lock yourself into a fixed rate.

    All of which shows you how Australia’s preference for variable rate loans coupled with central bankers rigging the price of money can turn a whole economy into a giant exercise in speculation. You make the biggest financial decision of your life based on factors that are influenced by unpredictable changes in the cost of money and the rate of inflation. Sounds like how you’d design a system to put people into debt to the bank and keep them there for decades.

    But only if rates move up, which they very well may be next week when the Reserve Bank of Australia meets to set the price of money. Based on the consumer price inflation data released yesterday (up 0.9% in the March quarter) annual Aussie inflation is running at the upper end of the RBA’s tolerance/target of 3%. The IMF says in its Asia Pacific Regional Economic Outlook yesterday that the RBA will have to put up rates this year as Aussie GDP rebounds.

    Incidentally, we had a quick scan of the report, which you can find here. A couple of charts caught the eye. First, you can see from the IMF chart below that housing credit as a percentage of GDP is higher in Australia and New Zealand than anywhere else on the chart (and probably in the world). And the total amount of credit is dominated by housing in the Anglosphere countries, reflecting… something about their fascination with the idea of getting rich from houses, although to be fair, the banks (the ones that survived the credit crunch) HAVE gotten rich.

    The second chart, below, shows that while Aussie banks (mostly the Big Four) have gone on a lending binge, the provision of credit to the corporate sector fell off a cliff. Big listed firms managed to raise equity last year (although not always in ways that boosted shareholder value, given the cost and return on capital). But smaller firms have been cut off by Aussie banks, according to the chart below.

    Robert Gottliebsen made this point quite clearly today at Business Spectator when he wrote, “The Australian banking industry, as it is presently structured, is unable to fund the needs of small and medium-sized businesses.” He the quotes from a UBS report we haven’t seen about Australia’s reliance in imported foreign capital (when you’re a debt junkie, any hit will do).

    “As UBS research shows,” Gottliebsen writes, ” Australian growth in loans to both the housing and business market have been funded by overseas lenders. According to UBS, Australian banks are getting close to the upper limit of loans that overseas institutions are likely to provide to Australia. And worse still – as ANZ points out – the European crisis could contract the amount of loan money available to Australia and lift its cost.”

    Ah yes. Greece and loan losses. ANZ’s Mike Smith got on the front with the issue in the press today, including his own handy new term to describe Greece: “a rogue sovereign.” The ABC reports that Smith said, “Europe is a mess and the sovereign issues have not been addressed with clarity…The uncertainty has continued and that’s probably going to get worse. The contagion issue is now very real.”

    The end result, he added, is a higher price for money for Australians. “That’s where it will impact us. In terms of the funding that the Australian banks have, in terms of their wholesale funding, obviously credit spreads are going to be more volatile.” Hmmn.

    Pop quiz! How do you kill Australia’s most vital industry, its mining sector? You plunder it, that’s how!

    The plunder begins on Sunday when the Rudd government finally unveils the Henry Review of Taxation, which, by all accounts, is likely to include a new federal resource “rent” tax to go alongside the royalties miners must already pay the States. The government could not have chosen a more apt word than rent. The government is the ultimate rent seeker.

    Investopedia defines “rent seeking” as, “When a company, organization or individual uses their resources to obtain an economic gain from others without reciprocating any benefits back to society through wealth creation.” Frederic Bastiat calls this kind of rent seeking a form of legalised plunder, and rightly so. His description distinguishes how the government raises revenue from how entrepreneurs raise revenue, by making a profit.

    Profit-seeking behaviour creates a lot of things: surplus, jobs, incomes, goods, and services. And for a company to produce a profit it must serve its ultimate master: the customer. Profit-seeking serves customers. Rent-seeking is the legally-backed coercive cudgel of Canberra.

    But one of our friends out in Perth – a man who works in the mining industry – put the case against resource rents far better than we could in a letter to the editor that we believe was published by the Australian Financial Review. He wrote:

    Our WA Premier has said:

    “BHPB and Rio fully understand … it is part of their corporate and social responsibility to pay their way.”

    “The mining royalty, the $40m that will be collected from this project, is not a tax – it is the price at which the people of Western Australia sell the gold.”

    This tired clichés of socialism are also blatant double talk from our Premier.

    There is no such thing as an Iron, Gold or any other mine until entrepreneurs explore for it then plan and build a mining operation which separates the mineral or element from the rock. All of this human action organised profitably by the private sector.

    Royalties are an additional impediment. They are legalised plunder.

    Bastiat wrote in his book The Law: “See whether the [said] Law takes from some persons that which belongs to them, to give to others what does not belong to them” and his further determination was to “abolish this [said] Law”.

    All WA people are free to invest and purchase equity in a privately run Mining company if they so desire, before and or after a discovery and thus participate in the wealth creation.

    In many cases the legal plunder or “Royalties” render the operation non-viable, and so destroy jobs, production and profits.

    This issue of royalty increases makes one ashamed to be an Australian; fancy living off of others hard work.

    M.N.

    Couldn’t have said it better. This brings us to the final part of today’s Daily Reckoning on who the real heroes of the free market (not the capitalists, not the bankers, and not the regulators). But we’ll preface it with a letter we received yesterday. Apologies in advance for the blue language:

    You &^%#ing doom and gloom merchants. I am sick to death of your negative projections whereby daily you drum up bearish sentiment with glee as though your ego would be happy to see a complete financial collapse so then you could say to everyone – see I was right, see look how clever I am. You are *&%#ing stupid that is all you are. You have been waiting for an excuse, any excuse to say see I told you the sky was going to fall in.

    What sort of impact does it have when you and other scammers with your $#!&ty little gold positions bang on and on that things are &#@%ed? That’s right the prophecy becomes self fulfilling when a critical mass is reached.

    Well done I hope you are proud of the destructive role, as opposed to creative, you have chosen to fill in this great endeavour we call humanity.

    Take me off your list, don’t mail me &#it all day every day and get a life you losers.

    With all due respect, we think the reader misunderstands our intentions with the Daily Reckoning. It’s just a reckoning. Lately, that means reckoning up all the badly allocated capital, human fraud, misguided public policy, and good old fashioned greed. When you reckon all that up, the sensible investment position is to be really, really, really cautions and highly (eternally) sceptical.

    But that is not a hereditary disposition. It’s just the position we think makes sense. Hereditarily – or really by choice – we are joyful optimists! Economic and political liberty combined have the power to unleash an astonishing variety of human potential, from the Mona Lisa to the Sham Wow!

    That’s why the great heroes of the Austrian School of Economics are the entrepreneurs. They are the creators who bring new things into the world with their energy and skill and dedication. They might do it with other’s capital (the bankers, capitalists, and investors). But it’s the entrepreneurs who are always on the frontier of economic experience, looking for a new way to use resources better, more efficiently, or chase whatever their particular passion or vision is.

    But those entrepreneurs have many obstacles to overcome these days, from competition to regulation to the equity markets being hijacked by financial capitalists who pursue financial gain alone rather than the funding of enterprise. We don’t live in a world with free enterprise at all, and perhaps never will.

    But we shouldn’t forget that the great achievement of the free enterprise system is that without any centralised direction or organisation – it manages to harness noble and ignoble human passions to produce choice and prosperity for millions of people. And with a fair and stable legal framework, that’s a kind of real justice that the plundering central planners out for social justice can never even come close to delivering.

    So no, we’re not trying to be clever and revel in the demise of the financial system. But we do think if you want survive the collapse of this system – a system based on debt, unsustainable finances, and a rotten moral premise of theft – you had better be willing to face facts and then make a plan and then make a life. If you don’t, you’re going to be the real loser.

    Dan Denning
    for The Daily Reckoning Australia

    Similar Posts:

  • Google Search Virtual Keyboard Now Live for 35 Languages

    People started spotting a virtual keyboard on Google Search for several languages last week and it didn’t take long for Google to finish testing and the roll-out. The company is officially announcing the feature, which is now live for 35 languages. This will enable users to type in queries even if their real keyboard doesn’t s… (read more)

  • BP and Oil Spills

    As we watch the slow but inevitable environmental calamity moving toward the Gulf states, I couldn’t help but remember another massive oil spill in Alaska in which BP was involved.

    In 2006, I wrote about that incident (story below the fold). Clearly off-shore oil drilling isn’t as environmentally friendly as the petroleum industry would have you believe.

    Timeline: August 2006

    BP Chairman speaking at StanfordBP, formerly known as British Petroleum, has marketed itself heavily as the greenest oil company, even going so far as to say that they believe BP stands for “Beyond Petroleum.” They’ve been quite successful at working the environmental organizations in their campaign to separate themselves from the dinosaurs like Exxon Mobil. But, with the disclosure this week that their Prudoe Bay pipeline must be shutdown in order to take care of years of neglected repairs, that reputation has suffered a big blow.

    But that carefully-crafted “Beyond Petroleum” image led by its green-friendly chief executive John Browne may be in jeopardy as BP deals with the latest blow to its U.S. operations — the shutdown of its massive Prudhoe Bay, Alaska oil field after a spill from a corroded pipeline.

    Now it looks like much of their story was just a Potemkin sham and the drive for profits has overcome their responsibility for taking care of their own equipment. And in this they were aided and abetted by our government who has decided that industry is overregulated.

    March spill

    The annoucement about the Prudoe bay pipeline reminded me of another story I read back in March. Back then, a very large spill was found on the pipeline that indicated not all was well.

    The spill was discovered early Thursday morning by BP operators visually inspecting lines, Beaudo said. He was not sure how long it took to respond but said the line was quickly blocked and depressurized.

    BP workers also shut down Gathering Center 2 in response. Gathering centers separate oil from water and other materials that come out of the ground during drilling.

    The spill was about a mile from the gathering center, which processes about 100,000 barrels of Prudhoe Bay’s daily production of 470,000 barrels. That oil is fed into the 800-mile trans-Alaska pipeline, which provides nearly 17 percent of domestic oil production and carries about 850,000 barrels per day from all sources.

    The spill was not detected by automated leak detection systems, which are geared to automatically shut down pipelines during catastrophic failures.

    “They are not necessarily as sensitive to very small leaks at any one time,” Beaudo said.

    Air monitors measuring high levels of hydrocarbons kept crews away Thursday morning. Beaudo said there could have been an explosion risk as well as a breathing risk for workers.

    Even then back in March, Chuck Hamel, a oil industry critic, indicated that the leak was much bigger than BP had admitted and the problem was poor maintenance.

    The amount spilled is far greater than BP and government officials are saying, according to oil industry critic Chuck Hamel. Hamel, of Alexandria, Va., said he learned from onsite personnel that the spill volume is closer to 798,000 gallons, which would make it the second largest oil spill in Alaska, second only to the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill of 11 million gallons in Prince William Sound.

    Hamel said meters record the volume flowing into the pipe as well as the amount leaving it.

    “There’s a 798,000 gallon discrepancy,” he said in a phone interview.

    Tuesday, in an interview with NBC News, a federal official in charge of pipeline safety charged that BP has been doing inadequate maintenance for 15 years.

    It is clear that the shutdown of the pipeline should not have been unexpected as the problems along the pipeline have been known for quite a while. While BP was polishing its green sheen, it was also directing its workers to neglect performing the basic maintenance on the pipeline.

    “I think this was predictable and preventable,” says Phil Flynn, an energy analyst with Alaron Trading Corp.

    In fact, allegations about BP’s maintenance practices have been so persistent that a criminal investigation now is under way into whether BP has for years deliberately shortchanged maintenance and falsified records to cover it up.

    The criminal probe was triggered by Chuck Hamel, a longtime nemesis of the oil companies and advocate for oil workers.

    “They’re playing the Russian roulette up there,” he says.

    Hamel says a dozen past and current BP employees came to him claiming they’d been told to cut back on a chemical put into the system to retard rust and corrosion, and to falsify records. A federal official confirms that many of these workers have also talked to the FBI.

    “They were telling me that they were not properly injecting the corrosion inhibitors into the system,” says Hamel.

    Does he think it was deliberate?

    “Absolutely,” he says, “to save money.”

    This week, in announcing the shutdown, BP acknowledged that a key maintenance procedure to check for sludge — known as “pigging” — had not been performed in more than a decade.

    It looks like BP’s greenwash has been just as manufactured as Chevron’s “People Do” campaign where more money was put into the ads than put into programs that the ads talked about.

    The solution is to stop killing the Electric Car and seriously start kicking our oil habit. We can’t afford the neverending oil wars nor the destructive damages that come from large petroleum companies proclaiming their environmental credentials while neglecting their responsibilities to the people and our environment.

  • inFamous 2 website registered by Sony

    Bet that cliffhanger of an ending for inFamous still got you hanging, doesn’t it? Not to worry, we may soon find some closure to it as SCEA hints at the revelation of its much-awaited sequel via registration

  • C. F. Møller Architects transform unused silo into a residential sky rise

    silo_1

    Eco Factor: Sustainable residential development.

    In Denmark there are a number of centrally located industrial silos, most of which are no longer in use, but still clog the skyline. C.F. Møller Architects along with Christian Carlsen Arkitektfirma have found a way to transform the silo complexes into modern residential developments using recycled materials.

    (more…)

  • Nissan to make profit on Leaf sales

    It was previously believed that Nissan would potentially be selling the upcoming Leaf electric vehicle at a loss, but now the automaker has confirmed that it will be able to turn a profit on each sale. Nissan expects as many as 25,000 firm orders by December.

    Nissan told Reuters while attending an industry conference that it has recorded 8,000 U.S. reservations since opening orders nine days ago, and that it plans to make a profit on each one.

    Strong demand for the Leaf
    Nissan had previously stated that it expected at least 20,000 pre-orders before the car even hit showrooms in the U.S., and now it seems the automaker may be on pace to surpass that goal.

    “We are on a double time march (for launch),” said Mark Perry, Nissan’s North America director of product planning and strategy, while speaking with Reuters. “We are on our way to have 25,000 firm orders by December.”

    Nissan will first launch the Leaf in the select states of California, Arizona, Washington, Tennessee and Oregon.

    Will the Leaf turn a profit?
    Nissan says that the Leaf sales will be limited not by demand, but by supply for the first two years. The car maker says the shortage will be alleviated once the manufacturing plants are built in the U.S. to produce additional Leaf models.

    Previously, analysts had suggested that Nissan may have gone too low with its price, even suggesting that the EV would be sold at a loss. Not so, says Nissan.

    “We are making money at the price that we announced,” Perry said. “We priced the car to be affordable. We priced it for mass adoption.”

    Nissan priced the Leaf at $32,780 – which does not include the available federal and state tax credits and incentives due to its environmentally friendly design.

    References
    1. ‘Nissan’s Leaf electric vehicle…’ view

       

    Source: Leftlane

  • Plane clips Toyota Prius during crash landing, pilot flees scene [Video]

    A pilot making a crash landing at a small airport managed to clip the rear of a Toyota Prius – with two sight-seeing occupants inside – before continuing on to hit a utility pole, sheering off the wing and coming to a halt. Then, without hesitation, the pilot grabbed a large bag and fled the scene.

    With the conclusion of the introduction to this story we have now apparently witnessed the advent of a new type of crime: the fly and run – according to the Prius driver that smoke with Daily Camera.

    The pilot, flying a small single-engine plane, reportedly came into contact with the ground prior to reaching the runway. After making contact, the plane quickly changed directions and headed straight for a Prius that was parked watching the planes land and take off.

    According to the Prius driver, Ken Marcoux, once he saw the plane was heading straight for him he had only an instant to smash his gas pedal and accelerate just enough to keep the plane from likely killing his wife in the front passenger seat. Because of the few feet Marcoux managed to cover, the wing tip ended up breaking the rear window and smashing the rear quarter panel on its way to continue to the field beyond.

    The plane then smashed into a utility pole, removing one wing, and then came to a stop. It was at that time that the pilot quickly exited the plane, grabbed what was described as a large, black satchel and then quickly fled the scene by foot.

    The pilot eventually – some four to five hours later – called the FAA to properly report the incident. The incident has sparked a debate over jurisdiction between federal and local authorities, and at this time no charges have been filed against the pilot as the investigation is on-going.

    References
    1. ‘Plane hits cats at Boulder…’ view

       

    Source: Leftlane

  • AP Wants To Negotiate Mobile, Wireless Deals for Members, News Industry


    AP Mobile iPhone App

    During its annual meeting today, the Associated Press board conducted the usual business—adding Washington Post Publisher Katharine Weymouth and New York Times Co. Vice Chairman Michael Golden to the board, agreeing to a July rollout of its News Registry, approving a new college football vertical with member rev share. It also took an unusual step: it authorized management to negotiate business models and develop platforms with content distributors, search engines, device manufacturers and others on behalf of members and the news industry. That mandate does not include pricing.

    That’s a major shift from the AP negotiating only for the use of its content and services, and speaking primarily on behalf of its own members. AP Chairman Dean Singleton, chairman and CEO of MediaNews Group, explained the decision to paidContent in an interview following the meeting: “AP and the AP board have concluded that it’s important for somebody to speak for the industry as we enter into business relationships on mobile and other wireless applications, including the iPad and others. The analogy that was used is you wouldn’t have 32 NFL teams individually negotiating for a broadcast agreements, you’d work together.” (Yes, he does know the teams negotiate for local rights.)

    The idea isn’t limited to mobile but, with all of the movement in that space and the potential for new revenue, that is the primary focus.  Publishers have been outspoken about frustration with device-driven deals, high revenue share and lack of control over customer relationships. Many also lack the resources to develop their own apps or negotiate broader deals.

    Why AP? Singleton said the news co-op is “uniquely qualified” to speak for the news industry given its 24/7 content sharing agreements, its customer base and its business/technology relationships, unlike trade associations lacking a commercial mission. “We need one voice, not only to work on business relationships but also new products that we might do together and also application frameworks so we decided AP should speak for the industry and work for the industry.”

    That doesn’t mean members have to participate in whatever the AP negotiates or use any of its templates. “Obviously, any member can decide whether to participate or not but my sense is most will.” What about his own MediaNews? “For new applications going forward, I think we will very much depend on AP to help set the table for us. It does not in any way keep us from doing our own deals if that’s advantageous.

    He added, “As we figure out how to format new applications, to the extent we can have an industry standard probably makes it easier to do. To the extent we can share technologies, that makes sense for many of us. Certainly there will be those companies that will do their own thing and they can but for the vast majority of the industry, we need to speak and plan and develop with one voice.”

    Asked about Amazon (NSDQ: AMZN) and Kindle or Hearst-backed Skiff as examples, Singleton explained: “We will want AP to negotiate the business terms for an industry relationship. We may want AP to develop a format that we can all follow or you can choose not to. It makes more sense if you’re putting together a business model for new applications. it’s much easier to have AP negotiate a model for the industry than it is for 1,400 newspapers to do 1,400 models. AP can then say, hey, we’ve worked out a very good plan for this particular function for all who want to work with us on it, let’s do it.”

    Singleton said the vote was unanimous. “We need the board’s total support, not only agreeing that we will begin speaking with one voice but also to fund the cost of doing this. There’s technology costs, software costs, power costs.” He wouldn’t provide details but said the investment will be “sizable.”

    This investment comes after 10 percent job cuts and revenue losses due to AP’s decision to give back more than $85 million in assessment fees to members during the tough economy. The AP annual report released Thursday showing a drop in revenue to $676 million, down nearly 10 percent from 2008 and a significant drop in profit, down nearly 68 percent to $8.1 million from $25 million in 2008.

    At the same time, the board approved the development of shared services and capabilities that could be used by members and others, along with the creation of white-label mobile apps for members to develop local products.

    Would AP deal with paywall vendors like Journalism Online? “We could. One of the things we might do is negotiate with one or two or three vendors and negotiate a model for the industry for certain vendors, then let newspaper companies choose what they use based on the business rules we negotiate. We certainly won’t do any exclusive deals with anybody.”

    When I brought up last year’s efforts by fellow publisher Walter Hussman and NAA to form some industry-wide approaches to paywalls, Singleton replied: “I love Walter, but the discussions that were had a year ago didn’t really have any portfolio or muscle behind it. It was ‘let’s sit around and get in a circle and look at our navels’ together.” AP is the only organization. he added, that has content, business or technology agreements with most of the newspapers in the world. “The NAA or an ad hoc group can’t do that.”

    Here’s the AP release on the vote and on the board election.

    Related


  • Hydrogen gets moving: rally Berlin-Stolpe-Hamburg.

    The Clean Energy Partnership (CEP) in Berlin brings the everyday usability of hydrogen vehicles and infrastructure to life:  a rally with hydrogen vehicles from Berlin to Hamburg via Stolpe will demonstrate this while creating a symbolic bridge to CEP’s new site in Hamburg. On the same date a new high-tech hydrogen fuelling station will be opened in Holzmarktstraße, Berlin. The rally is taking place only days before the opening of the World Hydrogen Energy Conference in Essen that will feature an opportunity for the general public to Drive and Ride and the vehicles.   More info on the rally of Clean Enegy partnership, CEP, website.

  • Twin Blades game preview for Windows Phone 7

    Frogz.ft has uploaded this preview of the Twin Blades game, currently available on the iPhone, ported to Windows Phone 7.

    The game is by BulkyPix and is heavily anime inspired.

    Read more at Frogz.fr.


  • Opera at Italy’s La Scala live on Turkish movie screens

    DENİZ İNCEOĞLU, Hürriyet , Wednesday, April 21, 2010

    Turkish art lovers will have a chance to see a live opera at the famous Italian La Scala Theater. On April 29 legendary Spanish tenor Placido Domingo will be live on screen at Cinebonus movie theaters in Istanbul, Ankara and İzmir with one of Verdi’s most important operas, ’Simon Boccanegra’

    Cinebonus movie theaters in Istanbul, Ankara and İzmir will show a live opera from Italy’s famous La Scala Theater on April 29. One of Verdi’s most important operas, “Simon Boccanegra,” which features politics and love, will appear on stage.

    The opera, starring the legendary Spanish tenor Placido Domingo and one of the world’s best known opera artists, Italian Ferruccio Furlanetto, will be led by the world-renowned conductor Daniel Barenboim, who was presented the Lifetime Achievement Award by the Istanbul Foundation for Culture and Arts, or İKSV, last year.

    Jose Placido Domingo Embil, better known as Placido Domingo, who is known for his strong and dramatic tenor voice, will play baritone Simon in the opera.

    Domingo, who turns 69 this year, debuted on stage March 28, 2008, for the 128th time, giving him more roles than any other tenor. He has since extended his hold on the record. Domingo is also an orchestra conductor and spoke about Verdi and La Scala.

    ‘Artists should know La Scala’s history’

    He has seen many opera buildings throughout his career, and when asked about the difference between La Scala and these buildings, Domingo said each opera artist who performs at La Scala should know about its history. “The premiers of all Italian composers and other foreigners have been made at La Scala over the last 200 years, and hundreds of master opera artists, dancers and chefs worked there. The significance of the history of this stage can intimidate a person but inspire at the same time. You want to do your very best performance there,” he said.

    Domingo said Verdi holds a special place in his heart and repertoire, adding that he was the best past composer. He said he had so far performed almost all tenor roles in Verdi’s operas. “I also performed some parts of the lead tenor Gabriele Adorno in the opera ‘Simon Boccanegra,’ but the leading hero of this opera is baritone Simon. This role is one of the most important ones of Verdi’s repertoire. I have dreamed of performing this role for years although he is a baritone. Now I am on stage to play this role.”

    Speaking about the difficulties of performing an aria as a baritone, Domingo said there were some difficulties but all of Verdi’s leading roles have difficulties that need to be overcome. “Simon is a very complicated character in terms of psychology. The person who plays this role should understand what kind of a man he is,” he said.

    Domingo has so far performed many roles, and there are also many other roles he wants to play. “But they are far from me,” he said.

    This year Domingo will perform in “Simon Boccanegra” in the United Kingdom and Madrid and will also perform Sigmund in “The Valkyrie” in Los Angeles. Domingo offered his thanks to the cinema project in Turkey, adding that thousands of people who have not had a chance to come to La Scala would be able to see him on stage, which makes him very excited.

    Tickets for live opera

    Ticket prices for the live opera are 45 Turkish liras at Cinebonus movie theaters in Istanbul and 35 liras in Ankara and İzmir. Tickets are available through www.cinebonus.com.tr and Cinebonus box offices.

    The Cinebonus movie theaters that will screen the live opera will be: Kanyon in Levent, Nautilus in Kadıköy, Capacity in Bakırköy, Gmall in Maçka, Palladium in Kozyatağı, Panora in Ankara and Kipa in İzmir.

    Simon Boccanegra

    Simon Boccanegra is an opera with a prologue and three acts by Giuseppe Verdi and an Italian libretto by Francesco Maria Piave. It is based on a play with the same name by Antonio García Gutiérrez in 1843 and was first performed at Teatro La Fenice, Venice on March 12, 1857. The opera is set in Genoa, Italy, in the 14th century. In the play, the leaders of the plebeians are conspiring to name the former pirate Simon Boccanegra as “doge” (chief magistrate). He accepts because he hopes to marry a woman named Maria. However, she has died, and the illegitimate child she and Boccanegra had has disappeared.

  • Ask Umbra’s pearls of wisdom on biking

    by Umbra Fisk

    Dearest readers,

    Ready to shed the chill of winter and dust off your
    10-speed? (Yes, cold-weather bike warriors, I’m aware that your bike never
    collects dust.) We all know biking is better for the environment than jumping
    behind the wheel (not to mention less expensive and healthier, assuming you follow the rules of the road). So I
    cruised through the Ask Umbra archives in search of some inspiration to offer the
    bike-curious among you. Where does your bike take you? Let me know in the
    comments below.

    Appetite for
    destruction.

    Sounds nutty to me, but even biking can get a bad rap sometimes—including complaints
    about biking being a dirty industry and bikers gobbling more calories, thus
    increasing their carbon forkprint. Let’s start with the charge that biking is a
    dirty industry. Based on the Carnegie-Mellon Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment model, which calculates the environmental impacts of different manufacturing
    sectors by dollar value, the production of bicycles is more carbon intensive
    than the production of cars (0.912 metric tons of carbon equivalent, OR MTCO2E,
    versus 0.628 MTCO2E per $1,000 of manufacturing costs). However, when we look
    at the total value of bikes versus cars, hands down, bikes win. Next up: that problem of a hearty cyclist’s
    increased caloric intake and the greenhouse gases associated with
    meat production
    , which we can neatly sidestep this one. Why would you improve
    your fitness and overall health by biking 20 miles a day, and then eat four
    steaks? Don’t eat more meat. It’s not good for your health, and it’s not good
    for the planet. If you must add foods due to your insatiable bike-derived
    hunger, let them be vegetable-based. Even on a 100 percent ground beef diet (ick),
    a person driving a car emits 730 kilograms of carbon equivalent per 1,000
    miles, while a cyclist will emit 410 kg over the same distance. More
    reasonably, if the person is fueled by the typical American diet, those
    emissions shift to 670 and 87, respectively. Get the full Ask Umbra
    answer
    .

    Highway to helmet.
    Indeedy, most bike helmets are made of petroleum-based plastics, but please continue to wear your helmet and
    replace it after each crash. Cut the straps of your old helmet and write
    “crashed” on it with a permanent marker, and then throw it in the
    garbage. A lightweight helmet made out of plastic is a fairly innocuous object
    on the environmental scale. As we have learned over the years, plastic is evil
    due to the raw materials from which it is made and the eons that will pass ere
    it degrades. On the bright side, helmets are light, and hence do not require
    overly much fuel on their trip to the bike store or the landfill. Some
    companies are even tinkering with eco-friendly
    helmets
    . And you could always save your used helmets for some kind of trash
    sculpture. A hospital visit has the potential for much more ecological impact
    than your discarded helmet. Your fitness level keeps you (hopefully) from
    general ill health, and hence reduces the need for greenhouse-gas emitting
    trips to the doctor. More important, of course, the helmet protects you from
    serious head injury and/or death, both of which are far more environmentally
    costly than a piddling nine-ounce helmet. Get
    the full Ask Umbra answer
    .

    Xtra-ordinary.
    Even people who have much to haul and live in fickle-weather places are able to
    shed their cars and replace them with bikes. It just requires planning ahead and buying a
    bike like the Xtracycle in a design
    suited to your needs. It may be a tad expensive, but certainly cheaper than a
    car in the long term. And handy: The rear tire on the Xtracycle is farther back
    and lower than on a traditional bike, configured for a long, hearty rack able
    to hold people, four panniers, musical instruments—basically whatever you
    might imagine. Xtracycle offers a conversion kit for traditional bikes, too.
    The best news, though, is not that the Xtracycle exists and is apparently
    great, but that it is not the only specialty bike out there. Bikes are a form
    of transport, and bike hauling is its own established transport activity with
    appropriate technology to suit. It’s not that we must weigh down our inner
    Lance Armstrong with unwieldy baskets and trailers; rather, we are updating the
    rickshaw. If you want to haul stuff on a regular basis, there is a bike or
    bike-expanding attachment for you. Get the full Ask
    Umbra answer
    .

    Skirting the issue.
    Want to don your best skirt, dress, or utilikilt but still commute by bike? Not a problem, ladies and gents. You should be able to hunt down a small-scale
    bike fabricator or repair shop that could build custom skirt and chain guards.
    I would start by looking for a few small bike shops with that punkish, bike
    messengerish attitude and asking them what the options are around town. It
    might be that these stores actually know where to buy pre-made guards. You may
    already have come across my second manufacturing-related suggestion, which
    seems to be all over the web: Make your own skirt guard out of fabric, cable ties or wire, and
    a pair of scissors. Get
    the full Ask Umbra answer
    .

    Banana seatly,
    Umbra

    Related Links:

    Take note, companies: Young workers want urban jobs

    Shape shifting bike trailer-cart-strollers.

    Ask Umbra on fertility awareness, grilling, and Earth Day pledges






  • Ford Xplor rethinks traditional SUV design with all-electric transmission

    ford xplor_1

    Eco Factor: Zero-emission all-electric SUV concept.

    With massive gas-guzzling engines under the hoods, SUVs are far from being green. Industrial designer TJ Vaninetti is trying to better the credentials of SUVs with an all-electric concept dubbed the Ford Xplor. The Ford Xplor is designed to run on in-wheel electric motors.

    (more…)