Blog

  • Witnessing suffering | Cosmic Variance

    While we’re on the topic of charities, it seems appropriate to note that this is a particularly opportune time to donate to an exceedingly worthwhile charity: Doctors Without Borders. They are doing amazing work around the world, and the current tragedy in Haiti is no exception.

    port-au-prince exodus (Maggie Steber for NYT)Note that Doctors Without Borders (more generally known as Médecins Sans Frontières) is not the same as Doctors of the World (Médecins du Monde; now called HealthRight). It’s somewhat ironic, but the Doctors couldn’t agree about how to go about saving the world. So MDM split off in 1980 (and is roughly 1/40th the size). The critical issue was the degree to which “witnessing” was a part of their mission. On the one hand, if you want to be able to go anywhere that you’re needed, it’s wise to be explicitly apolitical. Your goal is simply to help the sick and relieve suffering. On the other hand, if you witness atrocities, it seems incumbent upon you to tell the world what has happened. If you are on the ground in the midst of genocide, is it really appropriate to stay silent? Both groups “bear witness” to atrocities, but MSF is more conservative, while MDM is more aggressive.

    I think strong arguments can be made for both approaches, and I don’t think you can go wrong supporting either organization. As always, it makes sense to check out any intended recipient of largess on Charity Navigator. Both organizations get essentially identical, stellar scores (implying that the vast majority [~90%] of what you donate goes to people in need, and not to fatten the pay of executives, or into the pockets of Madison Avenue).

    Haiti is a tragedy of epic proportions. Here is a way to help.

  • Tricell CEO is new playable Mercenaries character in RE5: Alternative Edition

    Capcom has said before that the expanded Mercenaries Reunion mode in Resident Evil 5: Alternative Edition would have a total of eight playable characters. Today they’ve revealed a new one Tricell CEO Excella Gionne along

  • Study: Madagascar’s Weird Mammals Got There on Rafts | 80beats

    madagascar425Just how did all the exotic mammals of Madagascar, like its unique collection of lemurs, originally reach the African island? Did they float there from the African mainland, or did nature provide a land bridge? The question has vexed biologists because both explanations have their problems. But a new study in Nature proposes an answer to the main problem posed by the floating-across-the-channel idea, suggesting that it is the most likely explanation.

    Because of the narrow range of biology on Madagascar, most biologists favored the floating rafts hypothesis. But there has always been a problem with this notion: the currents swirling in the channel and the surrounding Indian Ocean would make it virtually impossible for a floating Noah’s Ark of vegetation to reach Madagascar’s shores [AFP]. Were those currents always this way, though? No, says a team led by Matthew Huber.

    Huber and his colleagues employed the computer modeling techniques used in modern climate studies to predict backwards. 50 million years ago Africa and Madagascar sat about 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers) south of their current positions due to continental drift…. By plugging data about the ocean and atmosphere of ancient Earth into modern climate models, Huber and Ali found that ocean currents around the two land masses once flowed eastward, toward Madagascar, after all [National Geographic].

    Madagascar’s four groups of land mammals would’ve arrived on the island between 60 and 20 million years ago. The peculiar set of creatures that arrived had always suggested that migration opportunities probably were scarce—otherwise (as with a land bridge) a greater mammalian variety probably would’ve arrived. The rafting hypothesis also matches the reality that none of the mainland Africa’s very large mammals made it to Madagascar. As you can see in the illustrative yet strange image above, you just can’t fit an elephant or hippo in a dinghy… or a natural raft.

    Related Content:
    80beats: Madagascar Chameleon Makes the Most of a 4-Month Life
    80beats: Scientists Find Oddball Right-Side-Up Bat in Madagascar
    DISCOVER: A Bridge To Madagascar
    DISCOVER: The Deadliest Carnivore, on Madagascar’s fossa

    Image: Nature


  • New immunization schedule released

    Claire McCarthyIt’s that time of year when we think about immunizations. That’s because every January the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) issue an updated immunization schedule. The online version is on the CDC’s web site. There are three schedules: one for birth to 6, one for 7 to 18 and a “catch-up” schedule for kids who start late or have interruptions for whatever reason.

    Immunization is an evolving science, and new vaccines are created all the time. Once we start getting experience with them, it’s not unusual to change the timing or number of doses. And sometimes vaccines get taken off the schedule, either because there’s a newer and better version, or (rarely) because of problems.

    This year, there are only a few changes:

    •    The vaccine against H1N1 influenza was formally added for children 6 months and older (since it was developed after last January, it didn’t make it onto last year’s schedule)
    •    A booster dose of meningococcal vaccine is recommended for children at high risk of meningococcal disease (such as those without a spleen, or who have certain problems with their immune system). If your child has already received meningococcal vaccine, check with your doctor about if and when another dose is needed.
    •    Whenever possible, doctors are encouraged to use combination vaccines (such as Pentacel, which combines DTaP, IPV and HIB). They work as well as giving vaccines separately, and most kids would agree that the fewer shots, the better!
    •    There is a new vaccine against rotavirus, called Rotarix. It’s given in two doses, unlike the three doses of Rotateq. Both are effective. The choice will likely be based on availability and insurance coverage—if you have an infant less than 2 months old (which is when the first dose of either is given), check with your doctor.
    •    There are two changes related to immunization against human papilloma virus, or HPV:
    First, there’s a new version, Cervarix, that protects against cervical cancer, but not genital warts or vulvar or vaginal cancers. It’s given in the same dose schedule as the existing version, Gardasil.
    Second, doctors are encouraged to consider giving Gardasil to boys, to prevent genital warts and help decrease the spread of HPV (which is a sexually transmitted disease). It’s not an official recommendation at this point, just a suggestion. Talk it over with your doctor. You can visit the CDC site for more information on HPV vaccination.

    doctor giving child a shotAs you look at the schedules and think about how the changes do or don’t affect your children, it’s a nice opportunity to stop and appreciate just how much of a difference immunization has made in the lives of children everywhere.

    There’s been a 75 percent drop in deaths from measles worldwide—and the Americas are measles-free. According to a report from the United Nations and the World Bank, immunization saves 2.5 million children every year. And if all countries could fully immunize 90 percent of their children under 5, it would save two million more every year. That’s a lot of children.

    It’s easy to get complacent, though, especially when we don’t see illnesses like measles anymore. Even chicken pox, which each year killed 100 children and hospitalized 10,000 before the vaccine was introduced in 1995, has become relatively rare.  When you hardly see illnesses, it’s easy to think that vaccinating against them isn’t important. And indeed there is a “herd immunity” that helps protect unvaccinated children: if enough of the children around them are vaccinated, they are less likely to be exposed to vaccine-preventable illnesses.

    But counting on herd immunity isn’t a good idea. First of all, every year there are cases of measles and other vaccine-preventable illnesses, many among children who come from other countries—and every year, they infect unvaccinated children. Second, if everybody starts counting on herd immunity instead of vaccinating, soon there won’t be any herd immunity—and the diseases, which used to kill or disable thousands of children, will come back.

    So take a moment this January to learn more about immunization. The CDC’s web site is a great resource, full of information about specific vaccinations as well as the risks and benefits of immunization in general. Talk to your doctor. When it comes to your child’s health, the more you know, the better.

    email
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Digg
    del.icio.us

  • The Tester: PSN’s very own reality series

    Just when you thought that reality shows are dying out and producers are going back to convoluted storylines and outrageous coincidences, the PlayStation Network launches their very own reality series. Aptly called “The Tester”, this show will

  • Just How Miraculous Could an Apple Tablet Be? [Blockquote]

    According to this tale by Fake Steve Jobs, the Apple tablet isn’t just great—it actually cures lupus. In other words, Dr. House’s entire diagnostic team is pretty much out of a job as of next week. [FakeSteve]






  • 9ff GTurbo mods Porsche GT3 up to 1,000 horsepower

    Filed under: , , , ,


    9ff GTurbo – Click above for high-res image gallery

    There’s a fine line between a sportscar and a supercar. Porsche is one of the few automakers that straddles the line, but an elite cadre of tuners seem to take pleasure in laying down strips of burnt rubber to blur it beyond recognition. Names like Gemballa and Ruf come to mind, but 9ff has emerged as the new power player, in one sense or another. And the German tuning house has just let its latest out into the world.

    Called the GTurbo, what we’re looking at essentially is a tuning program for the 911 GT3 and its even more extreme brother, the GT3 RS. Bolting on a pair of turbochargers, 9ff can take a GT3 up to 750, 850 or even 1,000 horsepower. That’s Veyron-league power, only without the all-wheel drive, the ground-grabbing track and the aero designed to go with it. Fortunately, 9ff has part of the answer in the form of a corresponding kit, including new bumpers front and rear, side skirts, and new quarter panels, with extra vents all around to keep the intercooler breathing and the air flowing. In full-fat 1,000hp spec, 9ff says its GTurbo will hit 100 kilometers per hour (62 miles per hour) in a scant 2.9 seconds and, theoretically at least, hit 392 kilometers per hour (243 miles per hour) flat out – which may seem like a heck of a claim until you realize that one of their own modded 1,000hp 911 Turbo hit just that at the Papenburg test track.

    The aero kit sells for 8,900 euros (~$12k), with five-spoke 19-inch rims for 4,980 euros (~$7k) and a specially-designed set of central-locking wheels for 5,950 euros (~$8k), all before taxes and painting. We’re afraid to ask how much the turbos cost, though. Details in the press release after the jump and photos in the gallery below.

    Gallery: 9ff GTurbo

    [Source: 9ff]

    Continue reading 9ff GTurbo mods Porsche GT3 up to 1,000 horsepower

    9ff GTurbo mods Porsche GT3 up to 1,000 horsepower originally appeared on Autoblog on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments

  • Will Melbourne ever get a +300m skyscraper to challenge Eureka

    It doesn’t appear anytime soon that developers will build a +300m building either office or residential in this city, and probably not +400m or higher.

    Do you think Melbourne will ever get a +300m skyscraper to challenge Eureka ?

  • Haiti’s Hidden Hope

    Mark L. Schneider

    A Haitian policeman detaining looters in Port-au-Prince, January 21, 2010 (Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Images)

    The colossal earthquake that struck Haiti last week raises a profound and recurring question for this fragile nation. As they bury over 100,000 dead—some of them in mass graves—and more than a million survivors seek water, food, shelter and medicines, can Haitians ever move beyond mere survival to build a more viable state? For a nation battered by two centuries of misrule, divided by garish contrasts between rich and poor, stripped of its forests, victimized annually by vicious hurricanes, built astride a ghastly seismic fault-line and situated on a favored route for cocaine traffickers, one may well conclude that misery here is endemic.

    Yet it is one of the terrible ironies of this latest calamity—the worst natural disaster in the history of the Western hemisphere—that in the year preceding the earthquake, Haiti had made considerable progress. Just last year, I sat in the now destroyed presidential palace with President René Préval as we discussed the need to move quickly on training and vetting new judges and relieving the pressures on vastly overcrowded jails. President Préval, who was elected in 2006 with broad popular support, initiated reforms of the police forces and judiciary, with some success. Following last year’s hurricane, the government was able to forge a national consensus on a recovery plan emphasizing rapid creation of jobs in industries benefiting from special U.S. trade offers and tourism, primary education, sustainable small-scale farming, and rural development. These little noted achievements could—if resurrected—provide the beginnings of a new Haiti.

    As the world begins to shift its attention from rescue to reconstruction, simply establishing security will be a huge challenge: some looters already are being shot or lynched, barely half of the nascent Haitian Police Force (HNP) is working, penitentiary walls have buckled and prisoners are on the loose, and fear of violence among citizens is increasing. Making Haiti safe again depends not only on getting Haitian and international police onto the streets, but on enforcing rule of law in a country where the judiciary and penitentiary system barely functioned even before the January 12 earthquake.

    Initially, much of the task of providing relief and law and order to the thousands of homeless in Port-au-Prince and other areas will fall to international forces. Despite the tragic loss of so many lives of UN officials who were trapped in the UN’s Haiti compound during the earthquake, the UN Security Council has reaffirmed its commitment by authorizing another 3,500 troops and UN police for the country, bringing the totals of its Brazilian-led peacekeeping mission (MINUSTAH) to nearly 9,000 troops and more than 3,500 police. The US has some 13,500 soldiers, sailors, and airmen positioned on the ground, and five ships including an aircraft carrier off Haiti’s coasts or on the way. The Dominican Republic has plans to send 800 troops to meet the MINUSTAH request and the region’s other nations are following suit. Canada has promised 1,000 troops and the EU is deploying 150 officers of its new European Gendarmerie Force.

    Adding to the challenge of coordinating this ad hoc coalition is the complex and often chaotic nature of urban life in Haiti, which has frustrated the efforts of foreign peacekeepers before. Without the close cooperation of the Haitian government and the Creole-speaking and street-wise HNP police in the lead, it will be difficult to contain spoilers—particularly in places like the sprawling inner city of Cite Soleil.

    Yet much could be learned by building on the changes in Haiti that were initiated—with UN help—before the earthquake. After coming to office, the Préval government had begun a serious effort to reform the police force, having stripped its ranks of many human rights violators and those on the take. (One indication of the challenge it faces is that the 2009 police academy classes graduated without weapons training because guns and bullets were not available for the shooting range.) While this reform was still incomplete, before the earthquake a poll showed nearly 60 percent of Haiti’s citizens approved of police performance—a far cry from the security forces that as recently as a few years ago were rightly feared by Haiti’s citizens.

    Haiti’s police headquarters and many local stations were destroyed in the earthquake. However, for a force with barely four years under new leadership, getting almost half of its 8,000 police on the streets this week is a remarkable achievement. Many of the police don’t have uniforms because they were lost in the destruction of their own homes. Others are still searching for family members and still others have no weapons. But they are beginning to be visible in Port-au-Prince.

    At the same time, the Préval administration had also pushed forward laws to establish a judicial academy, set new standards for existing judges, and authorize an independent oversight council. Along with rebuilding Haiti’s Supreme Court, and naming new judges to that court, these steps must remain high on the priority list. Préval’s earlier plan to reform Haiti’s notorious prisons, the site of appalling over-crowding and rights abuses, must be an equal priority, especially as the police recapture escaped prisoners.

    Security for Haiti will not end with reform of the police, courts or jails. It also will require a broader strategy for post-disaster reconstruction and stabilization. This will require an unparalleled international partnership with Haiti, and all donors must put aside national pride and interest for the greater good and support the UN coordination mandate. In this highly fractured and polarized political, economic and social environment, Haitians also must come together in a new social compact that reaches across the country’s broad chasm of class, race, and ideology.

    Clearly parliamentary elections planned for February 28 cannot be held. The Haitian government should also consider postponing the presidential election scheduled for November until the country has established greater stability. Combining presidential, parliamentary, and local elections would save money and increase voter turnout in communities still reeling from enormous reconstruction demands. These issues will be addressed at an international meeting in Canada on January 25 and at an international donor’s conference later in the year, but the long-term vision will have to be defined by Haitians themselves.

    President René Préval called the social movement that propelled him to an electoral victory in 2006, “L’espoir”—Hope. Today it is that Haitian belief along with “Tèt kolé,” the Haitian Creole appeal for unity, that Haiti and the international community must embrace. Only then will the question of whether Haiti merely survives or emerges from the ruins as a modern nation be answered.

    Mark L. Schneider is a Senior Vice President and Special Advisor on Latin America at the International Crisis Group.

  • Casey Johnson Sex Tape With Courtenay Semel

    Apparently, Tila Tequila wasn’t the only attention whore romantically-linked to Casey Johnson. Courtenay Semel, who bitterly split with the late Johnson & Johnson heiress in 2008, is spilling the beans on the lezzies’ previous life together, even revealing that the former couple once recorded a sex tape that they planned to use as a bargaining chip for a network reality show.

    Image Source

    “We had our own sex tape,” Courtenay says in a new interview with E! News. “It was either listen to our families and do what they say to get our lives back, or do it ourselves and sell this tape, work on our show. That was kind of our plan.”


  • NASDAQ.COM: Berkshire options surge on stock split-01/21/2010

    commentary by: David Russell

    Option volume exploded in Berkshire Hathaway today after the company split its shares 50 for 1, which increased liquidity in Warren Buffett’s insurance and utility conglomerate.

    Some 13,700 options contracts changed hands on the company’s B-shares today, more than 90 times greater than the average. The action was tilted toward the bulls, with heavy call buying and most put activity resulting from sales.

    New money streamed into the February 76 calls, which changed hands 2,284 times for $0.50 to $1.15, and into the February 72 calls, which mostly traded for $2 to $2.50. Existing contracts were adjusted to reflect the lower stock price after the split.

    BRK-B reached a new 52-week high of $73.43 before pulling back to $71.39 in morning trading, still up 2.69 percent on the day. The company split the shares as part of its purchase of railroad Burlington Northern in early November just days before it last reported earnings.

    The February 70 puts were the most active option contract. Investors sold about 2,700 contracts, generating as much as $1.35 of premium. The strategy reflects confidence that BRK-B will hold the $70 level. Overall in the name today, calls account for 71 percent of the options activity.

    (Chart courtesy of tradeMONSTER)

    Share Investor Links

    Share Investor Blog – Stockmarket & Business commentary
    Share Investor New Zealand Business News– Get more business news
    Discuss this topic @ Share Investor ForumRegister free
    Share Investor’s Daily Forex Updates

    Recommended Amazon Reading

    The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life by Alice Schroeder
    Buy new: $13.60 / Used from: $11.85
    Usually ships in 24 hours
    The Intelligent Investor: The Definitive Book on Value Investing. A Book of Practical Counsel (Revised Edition) The Intelligent Investor: The Definitive Book on Value Investing. A Book of Practical Counsel (Revised Edition) by Benjamin Graham
    Buy new: $14.95 / Used from: $10.44
    Usually ships in 24 hours


    Bookmark and Share


  • Guardian Launches Search Engine for Government Data

    The Guardian, ostensibly a UK newspaper, but also a major proponent for opening data held by governments to use by outside software developers, has launched some software of its own: a search engine that unearths datasets and pathways to data sets provided by governments around the world. World Government Data Search is now live.

    Yesterday the UK government released its new data site, data.gov.uk, to rave reviews (including ours). The new Guardian search engine searches across the UK, US, New Zealand and Australian governments’ data sites. The company also offered up a gallery of the 10 best visualizations and mash-ups built on top of government data like this.

    Sponsor

    The Guardian quotes developer Ben Fry on the future of searching government data: “This is only going one way: there is no trend towards less data.”

    Following an era when the quantity of data available online increased in orders of magnitude, thanks largely to easy publishing tools for end-users like blogging and social networks, many people expect the next era of development online to focus on strategic moves to make the most valuable data available in standardized formats that facilitate innovation by 3rd parties independent of the original sources of the data.

    If large, standardized data sets are a new language, then it’s time for a new period of literature to be written.

    Discuss


  • Solar Systems Installer SolarCity Secures $60M Tax Equity Financing

    SolarCity, a Foster City, Calif.-based provider of solar energy systems, has closed a $60 million tax equity investment deal with Pacific Venture Capital, a subsidiary of San Francisco power company Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E).

    Until the great recession and the credit crisis, tax equity financing was a common source of funding for cleantech developers. But these days, deals like SolarCity’s are rare.

    Here’s how the deal works: SolarCity installs the PV systems on commercial and residential properties. The property owners make lease payments to SolarCity, who owns the systems. This makes SolarCity eligible for  the 30 percent federal investment tax credit. However, in this deal,  SolarCity passes the tax credit on to Pacific Venture Capital in exchange for the $60 million investment and a share of the lease revenues.

    The two companies did not disclose expected revenues.

    SolarCity plans to use the cash to finance the installation of more than 1,000 solar systems, mostly in California and the U.S. Southwest.

    In a prepared statement Rand Rosenberg, senior VP of corporate strategy at PG&E, said:

    Equally significant, [this investment] enables us to take an initial step toward gaining valuable experience with a technology and a marketplace that may become increasingly important in the future.

    Last spring SolarCity closed on a tax equity  investment (of an undisclosed amount)  with Greystone Renewable Energy Ventures, an affiliate of  private investment firm Greystone & Co.

  • Seeking Middle Ground: Certification, Two-Year Programs Open Career Paths, Chicago Tribune

    A year after her 2006 graduation from a major four-year university, Liz Finnegan had little to show for her degree in psychology other than a job as a bartender. Deciding she wanted to work in medicine, not psychology, Finnegan began exploring training options offered by community colleges.

    In August 2008, she enrolled full time in the radiologic technology program at Palatine’s Harper College, which she had attended during the first two years of her undergraduate studies. This July, Finnegan, 27, will earn her Associate in Applied Science degree from Harper, and plans to go to work as a registered radiologic technician in a hospital or an emergency care clinic.

    Finnegan is one of a growing number pursuing training toward what are termed “middle-skill occupations,” those fields requiring more than a high school education but less than a four-year college degree.

    It’s a move likely to make them attractive to employers. In the greater Chicago metro area, one third of job openings through 2016 will be in middle-skill positions, says Mitch Daniels, labor market economist with the Illinois Department of Employment Security in Springfield. Each year through 2016, an average 53,500 new and replacement job openings will be mid-skill jobs, he adds.

    Many of the positions will be comparatively high-paying jobs, some paying more than what many bachelor’s degree holders earn. And there’s good reason for the attractive wages. People holding these skills are often in great demand.

    “In some cases, the young people being trained, or the older people being retrained, barely have time to complete their programs, because the demand for their skills among employers is so great,” Daniels says.

    Why the gap?

    In this era of rising college tuition costs, ever-greater college debt burdens and iffy employment prospects for four-year degree holders, why aren’t more students pursuing training for middle-skill jobs? The reason is outdated thinking about what such jobs entail, said Ken Ender, president of Harper College.

    “Let’s take a look at HVAC technician,” he says. “That job has gotten so sophisticated that it’s hard to go into without an associate degree. Automobile technician, same deal. Those are great jobs that are going unfilled in some parts of the country. People who say, ‘I don’t want my son or daughter working as a grease monkey’ don’t understand. Those are not grease jobs anymore. They are very professional, sophisticated and technical types of occupations.”

    Daniels echoes the sentiment. “There is such a stigma about what used to be called ‘vocational ed’,” he says, noting the stigma is unjustified today.

    “You get into the labor market much quicker and begin earning at a rate equal to or greater than someone with a baccalaureate degree. So you’ll have more years of earning in your career. And you enter with less college debt.” What’s more, the route offers flexibility. Students who pursue mid-skill education right out of high school don’t have to forget the dream of a bachelor’s degree, says Glenda Gallisath, associate vice-president for academic affairs, including workforce development, at Glen Ellyn’s College of DuPage.

    “What typically happens is [students] go to work, are successful in their fields, and are valuable employees who know the technical side. But to move up into management, their employers encourage them to go back and get a bachelor’s degree,” she says. “Many employers will support them financially in their educations, and four-year institutions will provide incentives to enroll, like flexible class schedules and off-site learning opportunities.”

    Where the jobs (and schools) are

    In Northeast Illinois, mid-skill occupations are concentrated in such fields as health care, manufacturing, transportation, construction and leisure/hospitality, Daniels says. These industries must fill such middle-skill positions as registered nurses, health information technicians, welders, computer numerical controlled (CNC) machine operators, general maintenance and repair workers, auto service technicians, carpenters, electricians and chefs. Computer support specialists and accounting technicians are required in every industry, he added. Many more mid-skill jobs of the future haven’t yet been created, Ender says. These jobs will likely meld two or more disciplines such as biotechnology, nanotechnology, information technology and manufacturing technology. There are and will continue to be several means through which to gain the post-secondary education such jobs will require. The first is earning a certificate or an associate degree through a community college. (In Chicago, programs are offered by the seven Chicago City colleges: Harold Washington, Kennedy-King, Wright, Truman, Malcolm X, Daley and Olive Harvey Colleges.)

    A second avenue is training while in military service. And a third is earning a certificate offered by corporations that operate their own credentialing services, particularly in information technology, Ender says.

    Of course, most such options involve much less time and far less expense than earning a bachelor’s degree. Many occupation-specific certificate programs take six, nine or 12 months to complete, Daniels says, while associate degrees generally require two or a little more than two years to finish if pursued full time.

    As far as costs go, “it’s an astronomical difference,” Finnegan says. Her final year toward her bachelor’s degree set her back $20,000, but the program she attends at Harper costs $5,000 a year. “And I don’t feel like I’m getting a lesser education,” she says. “If anything, I like it a bit more at a community college, because it’s smaller and professors know my name. I don’t have to talk to the teachers’ assistants, I can talk directly to my professors.”

    Because community colleges work closely with employers in their areas to identify job needs and design mid-skill education programs, they can often help grads identify prospective employers and make the transition to full-time work.

    When she graduated from Harper in 2006 with an Associate in Applied Science degree in dental hygiene, Deborah Bray relied on a book Harper’s dental hygiene program had compiled listing dental offices needing hygienists, she recalled. That led to a position with a dental group with offices in Barrington and Glenview. Says Bray of her two years at Harper College: “The teachers and everyone there really helped you, and really wanted you to succeed.”

    Cutting-edge technologies

    Mid-skill training often means mastering advanced, cutting edge technology. Such is the case in a certificate program offered through the Laser Photonics and Optics Department at College of Lake County (CLC) in Grayslake.

    The certificate program, which is expected to become a full associate degree program in 2011, trains students in the use of lasers in such industries as medicine, pharmaceuticals, manufacturing, defense, automotive, fusion energy and heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), said Steve Dulmes, professor and chairman of the Laser Photonics and Optics Department at CLC.

    The first course this fall started out with 16 students, several of whom were mid-career wage earners who had been unemployed for up to a year, Dulmes says.

    “Four of them rewrote their resumes to reflect their [new] training in photonics and optics, and three of those had interviews and jobs in about two weeks,” he says. “They all went to companies here in Lake County.”

    Today, there are about 30 community colleges across the United States offering programs in lasers, photonics and optics, he adds. One of them, Indian Hills Community College in Ottumwa, Ia., produced 18 graduates last spring, 14 of whom wound up hired at Northrop Grumman Corp. in Rolling Meadows, where their average yearly starting salary was about $56,000, Dulmes says.

    Students can complete the certificate at CLC in about a year, “if they are ambitious and take courses at night,” Dulmes says. Most applicants are those with work experience as electricians or in manufacturing or engineering, but those with strong high school science backgrounds can also enter the program.

    Yes, there are futuristic characteristics to some mid-skill disciplines, such as CLC’s photonics program, but that’s not their common denominator. What these positions tend to have in common is an enduring relevancy. “Many of the fields we are preparing students for are career fields that will survive over time,” Gallisath says. “The tools of auto technicians, welders, architects, and HVAC technicians may have changed, but the core fundamental need is still there.”

  • O mundo das Marquises

    Metam aqui fotos de edíficios com marquises.
  • GMOs: Safe for Consumption?

    GMOCorn GMOs: Safe for Consumption?We’ve examined the arguments for and against GMOs in the past. Indeed, there are reasonable and valid points to be made on both sides of the issue. Nonetheless, we concluded that there are just too many red flags to support the industry’s direction in GM technology. Not only do GMOs drive the use of naturally occurring and regionally suited seed varieties into the ground, they lock farmers (including those in developing countries) into a legal deal with the devil – one that often comes back to haunt them. Their rampant subsidization further encourages farmers to raise the same garbage grains and other “staple” crops that undermine our public health. And then there are the nagging, unsettling questions about our physiological response to these organisms. What happens exactly when you eat plants grown from seeds that are synthesized with everything from bacteria to fish to herbicides? What happens when you eat the animals that ate these crops? How much do we really know about these GM crops? With that in mind, a good reader sent this recently published study my way. See what you think.

    Researchers from the Committee of Research and Information on Genetic Engineering (CRIIGEN) and the Universities of Caen and Rouen in France collaborated on a full interpretation and assessment of Monsanto’s company research on three of its GM corn products: Mon 863, Mon 810 (both of which contain a Bacillus thuringiensis [Bt] protein for insecticide purposes) and NK 603 (which is engineered to protect the crop itself from the damage following the use of the company’s Roundup herbicide). Their conclusions, which suggest organ damage associated with hepatorenal toxicity among other negative effects, were published in the International Journal of Biological Sciences. The researchers, it’s important to note, didn’t conduct their own experiment. (More on this point later!) Instead, they fought a court battle that finally forced Monsanto to turn over the raw data from the company’s own research used to prove to government health organizations that their products were safe for human consumption.

    What??? How could the same data return different results? That’s the problem with statistics. It’s all how – and how much – you break it down. You can probably guess what Monsanto found in their interpretation of the data. Yes, their products show no adverse health effects in the group of lab rats used. As for the CRIIGEN analysis, their assessment wasn’t so positive. From their own extended statistical comparisons, they concluded that the three GM corn products resulted in statistically significant damage, focused mostly in the liver and kidneys but also evident in the “heart, adrenal glands, spleen and haematopoietic system.” In their analysis, the CRIIGEN researchers criticize Monsanto’s research design and execution, saying they “did not apply in any case their chosen and described statistical methods.”  The CRIIGEN group also claims that the company “introduced unnecessary sources of variability” and restricted the proportion of rats fed a GM diet (80 compared to the non-GM-fed 320). Additionally, they say the Monsanto researchers frequently modified their “biological interpretation of statistically significant,” including their observation of sex specific findings. The study modifications and inconsistencies, the CRIIGEN researchers suggest, “increases noticeably the risks of false negative results.”

    Monsanto, for its part, has fired back that the CRIIGEN researchers received assistance from the Greenpeace organization in their court battle for research documents and in their research assessment relied on “a variety of non-standard statistical approaches.” (PDF) The CRIIGEN group, Monsanto claims, dissected the data into so many statistical comparisons that they drastically inflated the probability of producing statistically significant findings. Monsanto also counters the CRIIGEN critique of the sex-based differences, saying the researchers found no biologically meaningful patterns. The company argues the CRIIGEN researchers made baseless assumptions about gender susceptibility, assumptions that skewed their analysis of sex-associated data.

    A number of international organizations have called the CRIIGEN assessment into question. Others have used it as fodder for a continuing attack on Monsanto. In truth, I think there’s enough to criticize on both sides when it comes to this research. Monsanto blew it big and put together a real piece of crap, but CRIIGEN’s nitpicking, while suggestive of the many holes in Monsanto’s research, doesn’t – and can’t – do enough to prove anything definitively.

    That brings us back to the CRIIGEN assessment of Monsanto’s study. This part, I think, is the real story. Of all the CRIIGEN group’s criticisms, the most damning centered on the research scope. (Remember, these company study results were presented – and in many countries accepted – as justification for widespread use of these crops.) Monsanto’s researchers tested the products on only one species of rat. The CRIIGEN group, in their commentary, suggested a minimum of three different mammals should have been used to presume human safety. But the duration of the study provoked the group’s biggest rebuke – and stern call for further study. Ready? Monsanto’s research into the potential health effects of these GM products lasted a mere three months.

    Three months. Let that sink in for a moment….

    This disclosure, I believe, is the true significance – and maybe even the real point of the CRIIGEN assessment study. Consumers, even in the U.S. are skeptical of GM products. How many of them know that all it takes for GM approval is a three month long study of a few hundred lab rats – only 80 of which are actually fed the GM food? I swear, it’s enough to make me burst a blood vessel.

    As the researchers note, long term health effects have no chance of showing up during a three-month study. Even medium term impact observation is questionable in such a short duration. Although the group acknowledges that their assessment is only enough to suggest toxicity, they argue the evidence is more than enough to justify further research. With this evidence and the original data limitations in mind, they call for a two-year study on the same GM products to adequately observe potential longer term conditions like “cancer, nervous and immune system diseases, and … reproductive disorders.” Further study, they say, is also necessary to determine whether any negative health effects are the result of the herbicides/pesticides that are synthesized into the seed or whether the effects are instead/additionally “direct or indirect metabolic consequences of the genetic modification.”

    When it comes to GMOs, we’re dealing with bizarrely hybridized organisms that the world – and the human stomach – have never before seen. The industry likes to paint themselves as modern day Gregor Mendels. The fact is, we’re way beyond pea plants. It’s not about cultivating hearty hybrids from natural plant varieties. The vast majority of GM products (70%+) are modified with herbicide and/or pesticide components. That’s right. No way to wash off those residues.

    Research not sponsored by the corporations is virtually non-existent, and there’s a very disturbing reason why. Big Agra companies invoke intellectual property law to restrict independent researcher’s use (and study) of their products. Twenty-six scientists scientists from public research institutions presented a statement to the EPA last year describing their concern with current industry limitations on outside study of GMO products:

    Technology/stewardship agreements required for the purchase of genetically modified seed explicitly prohibit research. These agreements inhibit public scientists from pursuing their mandated role on behalf of the public good unless the research is approved by industry. As a result of restricted access, no truly independent research can be legally conducted on many critical questions regarding the technology, its performance, its management implications, IRM, and its interactions with insect biology. Consequently, data flowing to an EPA Scientific Advisory Panel from the public sector is unduly limited.

    Different countries have different regulations for GMO products. The U.S. is one of the most permissive. This is likely of little surprise, given that GMO technology is such a huge part of agribusiness (and its political lobbying power) in this country. Many European countries accept some products and reject others. In a dramatic move, Ireland last year elected to outlaw all GMO cultivation within its borders. Another part of the country’s new policy creates a new GMO labeling model to encourage the purchase of non-GMO products.

    In the U.S., GM food products aren’t required to be labeled. (This, despite the fact that the EU, Japan, China, Korea, Australia and New Zealand all have label laws and despite the fact that 87% of American consumers want GM products to be labeled.) But there are steps you can take as an individual consumer to avoid GMOs. The biggest assurance? Eat Primal. The biggest GM food crops are corn, soy and canola (rapeseed). If you avoid these and the processed foods that contain the various fillers made with them, you are well ahead of the game. Eating pastured meats will allow consumers to avoid the potential negative health impacts of meat from GMO-fed livestock. Choosing organic, particularly USDA or Oregon Tilth certifications, can help you further avoid most GMO ingredients. Finally, check out the new Non-GMO Shopping Guide.

    So, I’ve offered my two cents and then some. Let me know what you think – of the study and the GMO controversy as a whole. I’ll look forward to reading your thoughts.

    If you liked this article share it with your friends by clicking the “Share This” link below.

    Get Free Health Tips, Recipes and Workouts Delivered to Your Inbox

    Related posts:

    1. Is Canned Food Safe to Eat?
    2. Are New Prescription Drugs Safe?
    3. Are Plastics Safe?

  • REUTERS: Buffett’s share split may tempt more small investors

    Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:46am EST

    NEW YORK (Reuters) – Warren Buffett’s move to split Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRKa.N) Class B shares will tempt smaller investors to buy into the once high-priced stock and could lead to its eventual inclusion in the S&P 500 index.

    Shareholders of Berkshire, the Omaha, Nebraska-based insurance and investment company, approved on Wednesday a 50-for-1 split of Class B shares (BRKb.N) in connection with the conglomerate’s takeover of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp (BNI.N) at a special meeting in Omaha.

    The split pares the partial shares Berkshire issues to BNSF investors. Buffett said at the meeting that the split was needed to make the transaction easier for small investors.

    Investment managers and analysts expect the move will boost demand for the B shares, which closed New York Stock Exchange trade at $3,476, up more than 4 percent after the vote. With the split, each share would be worth about $69.

    “This will definitely increase demand. The high share price left out many people from getting involved in something they otherwise would very much like to have,” said Patrick Watson, an analyst at Capital Cities Asset Management in Austin, Texas.

    Advisers said the split would boost liquidity and could raise the chances that Berkshire may be included in the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index .SPX, which could further increase demand for the stock.

    “It will be a good situation if it gets into the S&P 500, since there is all that built-in buying with different index funds,” said Alan Lancz, head of Alan B. Lancz & Associates Inc., an investment advisory firm in Toledo, Ohio.

    Berkshire is the largest U.S.-based company by market value not included in the S&P 500 because the highly priced shares traded on thin volume. Before the split, the Class B shares traded at six times the price of Google, the highest priced stock in the S&P 500 at $580.41 a share.

    One tripping point for Berkshire’s inclusion in the index is its first quarter loss last year, said Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst at Standard & Poor’s Indices in New York. S&P looks for four straight quarters of profitability when choosing stocks to include in the index.

    “There are other criteria such as leverage and balance sheet that could make up for that one-time item. And let’s face it, the last year has not been the best for earnings for anyone,” said Silverblatt, though he gave no indication that Berkshire was being considered for inclusion in the index.

    VERY UN-BUFFETT

    Buffett, 79, had never split Berkshire’s stock. One of the world’s most respected investors, Buffett reasoned in the past that splits could attract speculators rather than the long-term investors he prefers.

    Buffett controls 31.6 percent of the voting power of Berkshire stock and advisers said it was surprising that the so-called “Oracle of Omaha” would dilute the value of his pricey shares.

    “Buffet has never been someone to split the stock. But when they launched the B shares, it was a de facto split, so it is really moot,” said Richard Steinberg, of Steinberg Global Asset Management Ltd in Boca Raton, Florida, who manages about $470 million, including over $4 million in Berkshire shares.

    Jeffrey Saut, chief investment strategist at Raymond James in St. Petersburg, said the “un-Buffett-like” split followed the move to buy BNSF at a premium — a move Saut called equally out of character for an investor known for exemplifying the creed of buying low.

    “I think he was just sitting on too much cash. There is talk he will pass the torch and I think he was worried the heir apparent could invest in the wrong thing,” Saut said.

    While most advisers thought the split would be a boost for the stock, others thought the move could attract the kind of investors that Buffett had long worried about.

    “History shows that stocks that are split to achieve a lower price are degraded,” said Frank Pavilonis, senior market strategist at Lind-Waldock, a retail brokerage firm, in Chicago.

    Increased demand will likely lead to more analysts at Wall Street firms and other major brokerages to cover Berkshire, which has received little attention from research analysts. The issuance of “buy” ratings could help reinforce demand, advisers said.

    “Some people feel more comfortable when they see things in writing and can get reports from several different firms,” said Lancz.

    (Additional reporting by Leah Schnurr; Editing by Kenneth Barry)

    Share Investor Links

    Share Investor Blog – Stockmarket & Business commentary
    Share Investor New Zealand Business News– Get more business news
    Discuss this topic @ Share Investor ForumRegister free
    Share Investor’s Daily Forex Updates

    Recommended Amazon Reading

    The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life by Alice Schroeder
    Buy new: $13.60 / Used from: $11.85
    Usually ships in 24 hours
    The Intelligent Investor: The Definitive Book on Value Investing. A Book of Practical Counsel (Revised Edition) The Intelligent Investor: The Definitive Book on Value Investing. A Book of Practical Counsel (Revised Edition) by Benjamin Graham
    Buy new: $14.95 / Used from: $10.44
    Usually ships in 24 hours


    Bookmark and Share


  • International Law Weekend 2010: Call for Panels

    by Peggy McGuinness

    The American Branch of the International Law Association has posted a call for panels for the 2010 International Law Weekend, which will take place in New York October 21-23. This year’s theme is “International Law and Institutions: Advancing Justice, Security and Prosperity.” ILW is always a fun event — with lots of student, NGO, IO and private practitioner participation.  Full call for proposals after the jump.

    On October 21-23, 2010, the American Branch of the International Law Association and the International Law Students Association will present the annual International Law Weekend (”ILW”) in New York, in conjunction with the 89th annual meeting of the American Branch. ILW 2010 will bring together hundreds of practitioners, professors, members of the governmental and non-governmental sectors and students. It will feature numerous panels, distinguished speakers, receptions, and the Branch’s annual meeting. ILW 2010 will take place at the Association of the Bar of the City of New York on October 21, 2010, and at Fordham University School of Law on October 22 and 23. The overall theme of ILW 2010 is “International Law and Institutions: Advancing Justice, Security and Prosperity.”

    The global strategic and financial turmoil of the last several years has created unprecedented challenges and opportunities for international law and institutions. ILW 2010 will address the role of international law and institutions in reducing conflict, promoting security, fostering human rights, protecting the environment, facilitating trade and investment, and resolving public and private international disputes. Panels will examine subjects such as the extent to which treaties currently under negotiation or consideration would further these objectives, and the operation and effect of international organizations, international courts, and arbitral institutions on the global legal order.

    The Co-Chairs of ILW 20010 are Professor Elizabeth Burleson of the University of South Dakota Law School, [email protected], Hanna Dreifeldt Lainé of the United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, [email protected], Vincent J. Vitkowsky, Partner, Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP, [email protected], and Jill Schmieder Hereau, Program Coordinator at the International Law Students Association, [email protected].

    The Co-Chairs invite proposals for panels for ILW 2010. Please submit proposals by email to each of the Co-Chairs no later than Friday, April 9, 2010. The proposals should be structured for 90-minute panels, and should include a formal title, a brief description of the subjects to be covered (no more than 75 words), and the names, titles, and affiliations of the panel chair and three or four likely speakers. The proposals should also describe the format envisaged (point-counterpoint, roundtable, or other). One of the objectives of ILW 2010 is to promote a dialogue among scholars and practitioners from across the legal spectrum, so whenever possible, panels should include presentations of divergent views.

  • Amazon Allows Some Publishers and Authors to Opt Out of E-Book DRM

    kindle_logo_mar09.jpgAmazon quietly made a major change to its Digital Text Platform last week that went largely unnoticed: Small publishers and individual authors who use the Digital Text Platform can now opt out of the Kindle’s digital rights management (DRM) program. While this change only affects a relatively small number of publishers and authors for now, this move could hint at a larger change in Amazon’s DRM policy. Right now, Amazon’s DRM policy means that its customers can’t transfer their books to a non-Kindle e-reader.

    Sponsor

    Update: Amazon just contacted us to let us know that a DRM-free option always existed for publishers using the Digital Text Platform. Amazon just added new functionality that makes it easier for publishers to set these options.

    For Amazon, it makes sense to experiment with this new option on the Digital Text Platform. Given that this is a self-publishing tool, the company doesn’t have to explain this change to its partners in the publishing industry while allowing the company to experiment with a DRM-free solution. Most publishing houses tend to be very conservative when it comes to DRM-free e-book solutions. In the self-publishing world, however, DRM-free books are very common. Self-publishing platform Smashwords, for example, doesn’t even offer a DRM solution.

    kindle_drm_on_off.pngRight now, you can’t take your Kindle e-books to a Sony Reader, for example. While the Kindle is a huge success for Amazon, the current DRM solution is surely holding quite a few potential customers back from making the jump to e-books.

    The Beginning of the End for E-Book DRM?

    If the e-book world follows the same path as the music industry, however, chances are that restrictive DRM solutions will disappear over the next few years. At least for Amazon, giving its self-published authors and small publishing houses this option is a first step in the right direction. For O’Reilly, publishing a DRM-free e-book has turned out to be an advantage. Hopefully, other publishing houses will also realize that DRMed e-books do very little.

    Tip of the hat to Nieman Lab’s Joshua Benton for noticing this change first.

    Image Credit: Nieman Journalism Lab.

    Discuss