Blog

A new U.S.-led KFOR (Kosovo Forces) task force, based out of North Dakota,
officially took over responsibility of Multi-National Task Force-East (MNTF-E)
Nov. 14, joining units from five other NATO nations, all of which are maintaining
a safe and secure environment and freedom of movement in Kosovo…

The Department of Homeland Security has unveiled a new Web site designed to
provide a one-stop location for veterans looking for jobs…

Larry the Cable Guy has a new title. Call him Command Sgt. Maj. Larry the Cable
Guy, now.Minutes after the Nebraska Cornhuskers pulled off a 10-3 upset stunner
over the rival Sooners of Oklahoma University on Nov. 7 – a win that had
long-time Husker fan Dan Whitney (aka Larry the Cable Guy) smiling from ear to ear
– Command Sgt. Richard Burch, Nebraska Army National Guard state command
sergeant major, nearly brought the Nebraska native to tears as he officially
presented the nationally renowned comedian with a framed certificate that made him
an honorary command sergeant major in the Nebraska National
Guard…

Service members and civilians recently gathered at the U.S. Naval Station
Guantanamo Bay Navy Exchange to view an art exhibit with contributions from Army
Lt. Col. Miguel Angel Mendez, the detainee programs director, with the Puerto Rico
Army National Guard deployed to Joint Task Force Guantanamo…

Today’s updates were dispatched from Shanghai by two women named Katie, which seems like quite a coincidence until you learn that Katie is the most common name at the Obama White House, hands down.

The first, Katie Lillie, is an Obama veteran. She was an intrepid “press wrangler” during the campaign, a staffer who is embedded with the traveling press corps, helping make sure all their movements go smoothly. So it was a natural move for her to become the Director of Press Advance in the administration, coordinating press logistics on a grander scale. Since taking that position she has traveled 10’s of thousands miles and is working on her second passport, having filled the first to the brim with stamps and visas. What was so amazing to her about today’s town hall in Shanghai, was the similarities it had to hundreds of events held all over the United States during the campaign.

The BlackBerry 9700 isn’t the only announced handset that is being released today, and for those of you who prefer a phone with a bit more of that international appeal, may we present to you, the Nokia E72. Let’s recap some of the specs for those of you who may have forgotten: 10.2Mbps HSDPA, integrated compass, A-GPS, 3.5mm audio jack, S60 3rd Edition, improved email functionality, and a 5 megapixel auto-focus camera. The Nokia USA store and Amazon are still listing the E72 as “pre-order” but we are hoping to pick up a unit or 12 before the day is out. Anyone out there longing for this new Nokia handset, or have other recent devices stolen all your lust?

[Via Engadget Mobile]

Read

Remember this lil netbook Sony introduced not long ago? VAIO W  is a small form factor at 2.96 pounds first netbook introduced by Sony. Since we are heading into Christmas Sony pimped this cute notebook’s lid into snowflakes.

Featuring a unique snowflake motif, the VAIO® Signature Collection W Series Holiday Sparkle mini notebook seems to change its design depending on the angle you look from. Ideal for every member of your household, the W121AX/WZ mini notebook packs a 1.66GHz Intel® processor, 1GB of memory, 250GB hard disk drive and pre-installed Microsoft® Windows® 7 into an incredibly lightweight, go-anywhere design. The perfect addition to your on-the-go lifestyle, the W Series mini notebook is great for checking email, instant messaging and connecting to the internet from virtually anywhere. Created to provide the essential laptop experience, the W also comes equipped with built-in Wi-Fi, integrated Bluetooth® technology, and features a responsive keyboard and touch pad.

As you can see specs wise it is pretty attractive and you will also get an extended battery as well. I was just not sure what to do with it in summer time, as snowflakes won’t turn into green leaves on that lid.

With the EFF finally successful in getting the federal gov’t to hand over some lobbying documents involved in the process of granting telcos total immunity in lawsuits over warrantless wiretapping, the press is starting to go through the documents. Wired digs in and finds that the Bush administration was worried it would have to admit that the telcos had actually broken the law in order to get immunity — but were able to route around that by having the Attorney General “submit a certification to the district court that the carrier defendant either did not provide the assistance as alleged, or did so in connection with a counter-terrorism program authorized by the president and pursuant to written assurances of legality.” In other words, by doing a “this” OR “that,” they could claim some sort of plausible deniability for the gullible.

Of course, the whole thing is silly. Why would the telcos need immunity if they hadn’t broken the law? The only reason to push for immunity was because they obviously had broken the law. The entire push for immunity was never really about protecting the telcos, but about protecting the federal government from having to admit that it clearly broke the law as stated concerning oversight of wiretaps.

The other interesting element in the Wired report is that the Bush administration was worried that future administrations would reverse the immunity — something it doesn’t seem to have to worry about considering that the Obama administration has happily continued to hold the same position on warrantless wiretaps. However, the administration was unable to get anything put in the bill that would prevent future administrations from changing the immunity — so, perhaps there’s still some hope.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

We’re giving away five Peek Protos this week, one a day, and we want you to ask us nicely for one so we can give you one. What I’m basically trying to say is that you should respond to this post with a comment (using your real e-mail address) and also follow CG on Twitter and watch the Gift Guide for more special things.

The wait for the Congressional Budget Office score on the Senate health care reform bill has left Senators with time to carefully consider all the angles on reform, The New York Times reports. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid “has already received some substantial analysis of his measure, and if the numbers had been what he wanted, he would have released a bill by now. Instead, he has repeatedly gone back to the budget office with variations of the legislation” to limit the cost of the bill while maximizing the number of people covered (Herszenhorn, 11/15).

Roll Call reports, however, that Reid is confident debate will begin on the bill before Thanksgiving. “Reid wanted to get the ball rolling on the overhaul early this week armed with a Congressional Budget Office analysis, but because that CBO score didn’t come on Friday as he had hoped, Democratic aides said the Majority Leader is prepared to push back his timeline…. Democratic aides said last week that they do not believe that any member of the 60-strong Democratic Conference will vote to prevent the full Senate from bringing the measure to the floor.” Reid “would like to spend all three weeks before Christmas amending and debating the health care bill” (Pierce, 11/16).

The Las Vegas Sun reports that just getting the bill to the floor will prove difficult for Reid. “Reid, ever the obsessive vote counter, believes he is about there, even though some dissenting Democrats, including Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska, continue to withhold their support for the procedural step until they see the actual bill and its financial analysis.” If debate commences, it promises to be muddied up by the many amendments both Republicans and Democrats are promising to offer, the Las Vegas Sun reports (Mascaro, 11/15).

Politico reports that Democrats stand to “reap the political rewards if they can pull off health reform, by achieving near-universal coverage, toughening regulations on private insurers and transforming the way health care is delivered. But Democrats have glossed over nagging details of just how limited reform’s reach would be for some Americans. And if voters figure it out, experts warn there could be a political backlash.” “Landmines” in the bill include the public option, fines for not carrying insurance, premiums and less money for Medicare (Budoff Brown and Frates, 11/16).

The Associated Press reports a new AP poll (conducted by Stanford University with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation) found that the fine print in health bills worries some Americans. “Despite a widely shared conviction that major health care changes are needed, Democratic bills that aim to extend coverage to the uninsured and hold down medical costs get no better than a lukewarm reception in the latest results.” Of those surveyed by the poll, 43 percent oppose the plans while 41 support them. Fifteen percent remain undecided. “In one particularly striking finding, the poll indicated that public support for banning insurance practices that discriminate against those in poor health may not be as solid as it seems.” When told it would probably cause them to pay more for their insurance, 43 percent said “they would still support doing away with pre-existing condition denials but 31 percent said they would oppose it” (Alonso-Zaldivar and Tompson, 11/16).

In related coverage, The Associated Press has the verbatim comments of some health care reform poll takers (11/16).

Meanwhile, The Hill reports that from House Democrats, the bill has become “a political hot potato. Few Democrats in big races are jumping headlong into supporting the healthcare bill the House passed last weekend. While those running in blue areas or in tough Democratic primaries quibble with its abortion-funding restrictions, those running in red areas worry about the cost of the package.” That’s especially true of lawmakers and congressional hopefuls in Massachusetts, Illinois, Ohio and Missouri (Blake, 11/14).

Finally, Kaiser Health News provides highlights of the weekend’s health policy headlines, including the latest on the Senate Democrats’ health bill, a CMS analysis of the House-passed reform measure and the continued fracas over abortion provisions.

Newspapers continue to report on the Stupak amendment to the House health bill and how it will affect access to abortion.

“[T]he Stupak amendment, named for Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), would ban individuals from using new government subsidies to buy insurance plans that cover abortion, and it would prohibit a government-operated plan — the public option — from carrying abortion coverage,” Politico reports. Supporters of the amendment “say that it simply extends an existing prohibition on federal funding for abortion — an annually renewed policy called the Hyde amendment — to the health care exchange that would be established for the uninsured under the health care bill making its way through Congress. But lawmakers who support abortion rights contend that, if the Stupak amendment’s logic is extended to the $250 billion in tax breaks Americans get to buy coverage through employer-based plans, it could strip abortion coverage from tens of millions of women who already have it.”

Workers who have health benefits through their jobs are exempted from paying income taxes on their premium contribution. “Congress considers the income tax exclusion to be a massive ‘tax expenditure’ — a subsidy — for individuals to buy insurance.” Many of those plans cover abortion. “Taking the concept of a subsidy one degree further — from individual purchasers to corporate providers — insurance companies that offer plans that cover abortion get tens of billions of dollars of subsidies through programs like Medicare Advantage and the 2003 prescription drug law. While few, if any, seniors have need for abortion coverage, the big insurers who administer those plans also offer insurance policies that cover abortion to younger women and their husbands and fathers” (Allen, 11/16).

Las Vegas Sun: “Days after the House voted to include stricter abortion restrictions in the health care bill, nearly 50,000 abortion rights supporters urged [Senate Majority Leader Harry] Reid in a petition to block the provision from the Senate bill he is crafting. Conventional wisdom says the majority leader faces a great dilemma: Reid is a Mormon who opposes abortion but is under great pressure from the Democratic base to prevent the House’s strict Stupak-Pitts amendment from being included in the Senate” (Mascaro, 11/15).

The Los Angeles Times reports on the influence of Catholic bishops over abortion language in the health bills. “A number of groups oppose abortion rights, but the church is one of the few to also support Democratic efforts to overhaul healthcare. That has given the church a seat at the negotiating table. It used that influence this month as the House of Representatives prepared to vote on the healthcare legislation. Negotiators for the church worked with lawmakers to add an amendment to ensure that federal insurance subsidies do not wind up funding elective abortion.” In addition, “[t]he church also had amassed goodwill during years of working with Democrats on such issues as tax credits for the working poor, immigration, climate change and nutrition programs. It had built a level of trust that other antiabortion groups could not” (Oliphant, 11/16).

NPR interviewed Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., co-chair of the Congressional Pro-Choice Caucus. “She’s authored a letter that has been co-signed by more than 40 of her colleagues saying they will not support a final bill that includes the Stupak Amendment” (Martin, 11/13).

KHN summaries from Sunday’s abortion coverage: Democrats Stymied On Abortion In Health Bill

The bills pending in Congress could alter some restrictions on insurers and channel money to state health programs.

The House bill includes, for instance, $23.5 billion to “allow Congress to continue pumping billions in new short-term aid to states to cover Medicaid costs that have increased with rising unemployment in the past year,” The Washington Post reports. The stimulus bill in February also included Medicaid funding, but that package is due to run out next year (Davis, 11/16).

The bill could make it difficult for some states to enforce consumer protection laws, the Los Angeles Times reports. “Healthcare overhaul bills in both the Senate and the House would open the door to insurers selling policies across state lines — which some lawmakers fear could allow health plans to take advantage of the lenient rules in some jurisdictions while avoiding tougher enforcement regimes in places like California” (Girion, 11/16).

State insurance commissioners, however, could also be vested with sweeping new powers. “The Illinois Department of Insurance helps to oversee a health care system that has allowed insurance companies to essentially dictate how much consumers are charged and what kind of benefits they get,” the Chicago Tribune reports. “But that would change under health care bills making their way through Congress. … [S]tate insurance directors, would be given unprecedented powers in helping to decide the benefits and cost of health plans for the proposed government-regulated insurance exchange” (Japsen, 11/16).

Bloomberg reports that Sen. Joe Lieberman’s “independence (is hindering) Democrats’ health-care end game.”

 “While Lieberman still aligns himself with the Democratic caucus, his threat to block health legislation ‘as a matter of conscience’ shows a growing willingness and confidence to stand on his own, analysts say. … Lieberman can influence the outcome because no Republicans have offered to support the overhaul measure from Reid, a Nevada Democrat. Lacking Republican allies, Democrats need all 60 members of their caucus, which includes Lieberman and Independent Bernard Sanders of Vermont, to bring the measure up for a final vote.” 

On the government-run public option plan, he told Bloomberg: “‘I have no other choice,’ Lieberman said in an interview with Bloomberg News. ‘I have to use the right I have as a senator to stop something I think will be terrible. I really want to vote for health-care reform.’” Some say Lieberman’s stance “reflects his ties to home-state insurers, say critics who protested outside his Washington office Nov. 10”  (Gaouette and Salant, 11/16).

Roll Call profiles Majority Leader Harry Reid (“The Ultimate Closer”) who has “emerged as the central player in President Barack Obama’s push to enact health care reform this year” and has 16 blurbs on the major players in health care reform (Drucker, 11/16). See the full list of profiles here.

In a separate story, Roll Call profiles Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe, whose “support will be crucial in crafting a more moderate compromise bill that ultimately is expected to emerge in the coming weeks.” She is keeping both sides guessing at what her final decision on reform will be (Murray, 11/16).

In Virginia, Sens. Mark Warner and Jim Webb are making their voices, the Richmond Times-Dispatch reports. “Virginia’s two senators are expressing concerns about costs — in the expense of individuals’ premiums and the rising federal deficit. While both are open to the idea of a public option, it’s not their priority” (Meola, 11/15).

Jackie Judd, Kaiser Family Foundation | Mary Agnes Carey and Eric Pianin, Kaiser Health News

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., may unveil his health care overhaul plan this week and deliberations in that chamber could continue into Thanksgiving week when the Senate has been scheduled to be in recess. Meanwhile, a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) analysis of the House-passed bill found that the measure would increase national health expenditures by an estimated 1.3 percent in 2019. Republicans say the analysis shows that the bill will not control health care costs but Democrats disagree.

Listen to audio version (.mp3) or Read Transcript

Update: Yahoo Messenger 10 is now out of beta. Features include: high quality video calling, Yahoo Updates view of your contacts list, and availability in 16 languages.

Original Article: Yahoo Messenger Version 10 is now available in beta. New features include enhanced video calling, courtesy of GIPS, friend updates from Yahoo, Flickr, Twitter, and others through the new updates view, and improved language support.

GIPS has provided the underlying voice technology for Yahoo Messenger for the last three years. Now GIPS is providing its VideoEngine to add the video element to the messenger.

"With the launch of Yahoo! Messenger 10, we’re allowing people to instantly communicate with friends and family around the world through new interactive and social features like video calls," says Dave Merriwether, senior director of Yahoo! Messenger. "The GIPS VideoEngine enables us to provide the Yahoo! Messenger community with the best video experience possible. Now people can enjoy full-screen, face-to-face chats with friends and family at no cost, in the familiar Yahoo! Messenger environment." 

"Yahoo! Messenger is the leading communication platform that provides people with the greatest choice to stay connected to one another through text IM, PC-based calling, mobile text messaging and now video calling," says Emerick Woods, GIPS’ CEO. “"We’re proud to work with Yahoo! to deliver a truly differentiated high quality video experience for the hundreds of millions of people on Yahoo! Messenger around the world."

On a semi-related note, Google just recently launched a new voice/video chat application for the iGoogle homepage. You can read more about that here.
 

Related Articles:

> Yahoo Will No Longer Support Old Versions of Messenger

> Yahoo Messenger iPhone App Introduced

> Yahoo Messenger Adds Social Features

Google Chrome might be compared to a racecar; both are fast, but lacking in amenities.  It looks like Google’s about to give Chrome users the option of adding air conditioning, stereo system, and cup holder equivalents, though, as extensions may become available in the very near future.

Last night, Lee Mathews discovered that an interesting little change had been made to the page Chrome displays when you open a new tab.  He wrote, "Up until now, the corner of the page featured a small graphic which linked to the Themes Gallery.  Today, that image was replaced with . . . links to https://chrome.google.com/extensions."

Unfortunately, at the time of Mathews’s find (and of this article’s publishing), the link just redirected to Google.com.  Loyal Chrome fans can’t yet spiffy up their browser, and developers and would-be users also remain out in the cold.

Still, Google doesn’t make a happy of sprinkling useless links all over the place, and since we’ve been expecting Chrome extensions for about six months, a full launch could occur at any time.

Chrome’s market share – and Google’s reaction to ad-blocking extensions – will bear close watching following that point.

Related Articles:

> Google Chrome For Mac May Hit Beta In December

> New Google Chrome Release Includes Bookmark Sync

> Google Releases Latest Version Of Chrome

Everyone, I beat Borderlands on the PC over the weekend. It’s a fantastic game and I highly recommend it although the end boss was a joke against my high-powered sniper rifle. But it looks like I’m not done yet. IGN got some playtime on the $10 DLC expansion and it looks fantastic. Zombies! The DLC Zombie Island of Dr. Ned is coming out on November 24 for the 360 and PS3 with the PC version dropping shortly afterwards. Check out the 2 minute video after the jump.

Windows 7 users would be well-advised to block outgoing ports 139 and 445. Microsoft has confirmed the existence of a vulnerability that affects SMB in Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 RC2. Worst case scenario: you connect to a malicious server then it crashes your PC.

The beauty here is that, in a perfect world, these ports would be blocked by default, making the exploit much less troubling. Let’s say you’re messing around on your computer, and all of a sudden Windows (or your firewall of choice) prompts you to open port 445 for a connection. So you say to yourself, “Hmm, I’m pretty sure my game of chess doesn’t need to access an SMB share to work properly, so I’m going to go ahead and deny that port-open request.”

But that’s now how the real world works.

It comes down to this: block those two ports when you’re not actively using them. No problems.

I could make some sort of snide remark about this being the first of many (maybe!) Windows 7 exploits, but let’s face it: when you’re dealing with so many lines of code, you’re bound to find a few bugs in there.

Oh, and Microsoft hasn’t said when it plans to patch the exploit. Presumably it will do so with its next big first Tuesday of the month patch day.

via Slashdot