Blog

  • Hefner’s Secretary Dies: Mary O’Connor Worked at the Playboy Mansion For Over 40 Years

    Mary O’Connor, the longtime secretary of Hugh Hefner, has died. Hefner is the publisher of the popular men’s magazine Playboy. O’Connor worked at the Playboy mansion for over 40 years.

    The specific cause of O’Connor’s death has not been released, but it appears that she had been sick in the days leading up to her passing. On January 26 Hefner tweeted that his wife, Crystal, was visiting O’Connor, who was “not doing very well.”

    Hefner then announced late last night that O’Connor passed away:

    It’s clear that O’Connor was well-loved by the many girls who passed through the doors of the Playboy mansion. Current and former playmates are tweeting their condolences and expressing their love for O’Connor:

    In addition to her work for Playboy, O’Connor made multiple appearances on the reality show The Girls Next Door:

  • Law Enforcement Officials Discuss Keeping Our Communities Safe

    Watch this video on YouTube

    Today, President Obama and Vice President Biden continued the conversation about reducing gun violence in a meeting with law enforcement officials.

    No group is more important in helping make our communities safer, President Obama said, because they recognize that it’s not only the high-profile mass shootings that need to be addressed, but also the everyday gun violence that happens in cities and towns across the country.

    That’s why part of the conversation that we're going to be having today relates not only to the issue of new laws or better enforcement of our gun laws, it also means what are we doing to make sure that we've got the strongest possible law enforcement teams on the ground?  What are we doing to hire more cops?  What are we doing to make sure that they're getting the training that they need?  What are we doing to make sure our sheriff's offices in rural counties have access to some of the resources that some of the big cities do in order to deal with some of these emergencies?  

    Two weeks ago, President Obama issued 23 executive actions to help reduce gun violence, and called on Congress to pass laws that will help keep guns out of the wrong hands, ban assault and high-capacity magazines, make our schools safer, and increase access to mental health services. Read more about the plan here.

    read more

  • Beachfront automates app building for Roku, Google TV, Samsung and LG

    Distributing video content to connected TV platforms just got a bit easier: Beachfront Media, the company behind the video discovery site Mefeedia, added an option to build apps to Roku, Google TV, Samsung and LG to its Beachfront Builder offering. Some of the first publishers mentioned by Beachfront for taking advantage of this are the lifestyle TV network Plum TV and YouTuber Tyler Oakley, but a bit of digging unveiled that College Humor seems to be on board as well.

    Beachfront Media launched its Beachfront Builder in private beta last summer, initially focusing on Android and iOS apps based on a number of preformatted templates. Building apps is completely free, but publishers that want to monetize their apps need to become premium customers, which involves revenue share as well as a startup fee. Premium customers can elect to run their own ads against their content, have Beachfront sell inventory for them, or take advantage of both.

    Monday’s announcement extends this model to connected TV platforms, which should help publishers who can’t afford to spend a ton of money to develop their own apps for a number of connected devices. But it looks like some bigger publishers are making use of Beachfront for their videos as well: A quick search on Google Play revealed that Beachfront Media also distributes College Humor’s Android apps.

    Beachfront Media started out with a SEO-focused video portal called Mefeedia, but has been focusing on video distribution and monetization in recent months. The company announced earlier this month that it distributed three billion videos on various platforms in 2012.

  • Inside PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Annual CEO Survey

    PricewaterhouseCoopers unveiled their annual CEO survey at this year’s meeting of the World Economic Forum at Davos. The survey offers a broad sentiment sample from over 1300 CEOs from 68 countries. The report is available online, as is a really rich interactive tool that allows you to slice the data and see how your company compares with some of the global sentiment. We caught up with PwC U.S. Chairman and Senior Partner Bob Moritz in Davos to find out what he found surprising about the report and understand how his company is using data differently itself. An edited version of the interview transcript appears below.

    What do you see as the mood at this year’s Davos?

    A bit of optimism but it’s definitely cautious optimism. We’re a heck of a lot better at this event than we were here over the last three or four years, and that’s probably because there’s no one catastrophic or imminent issue that’s on the table.

    That correlates with what your survey reports.

    Definitely. Of the CEOs surveyed, 50%-plus said things will stay the same for their companies. Last year, 50% said things would get worse. So on a year-over-year basis, that’s good. What’s really interesting is the CEO’s confidence in increasing revenue year over year is down. Why is that, when you have a more stable view? There are two reasons for this, based on our hypothesis and some of the feedback we’ve gotten here. One is we’ve got some hangover problems: European issues, the fiscal cliff issue that got kicked down the road. We haven’t really tackled some of the crosshair issues that need our attention. The second is that in a sustained low-growth environment, the pie isn’t getting any bigger, so everyone’s competing for a smaller slice of that pie. So you have to innovate, do things better, and customer service becomes more important. 82% of the CEOs in the survey said they were going to spend time changing their customer strategies in 2013.

    Some of that focus on customer strategy in the survey translates into increasing use of analytics and big data.

    When CEOs talk about customer strategy you have to figure out what they really mean. One thing is identifying the customer and what product offerings you want to make — there, the innovation piece is really important. Second, how do you interact with customers more effectively to get higher retention and a longer-term relationship with them? And third, how do you interact with customers both personally and enabled by technology?

    One example of a client using data to change the nature of their customer relationship comes from a large mortgage insurer. They had been using their agents just to sell insurance, and typically those agents would be contacted by customers after they already selected a house and needed to buy mortgage insurance. We worked with the insurer to supply the agents with more data so they could contact clients further upstream, say three months before the purchase. Then they could provide information on the insurance, obviously, but also on the demographics of the area, comparable homes with insurance info, data on schools — that kind of thing. The data turned what had been a transaction into a service and an experience.

    How are you using data in new ways at PwC?

    One interesting thing we are doing now because of increasing access to data is hiring different kinds of people. We’re hiring outsiders more than ever before. As I mentioned, CEOs today need help with customer service and we’re hiring for that. We’re also hiring more doctors. If you want to go after the health care system, you need to understand what information is needed at diagnosis, how does it then go through the supply chain, etc. That’s analytics, big data, predictive data and we’re making a lot of hires there.

    Let’s jump back to the survey for a second. What was most surprising to you about the report?

    The lack of M&A activity was surprising, especially when you look at the cash on the balance sheets. After dissecting the issue, we expect that people will be looking at deals in 2013 but they’ll be smaller. And any M&A activity that does happen will probably be towards the end of 2013 given the uncertainties. Another big surprise was the variability by country of the confidence levels. The last surprising thing for me was the extent to which people are still focused on cost management initiatives. It was 80-something percent last year. This year it’s still in the 70s.

    And what are the uncertainties — the crosshair issues you mentioned — that you don’t think people are dealing with?

    When you look at political agendas, there’s increased uncertainty in Europe with what Cameron said about putting the EU membership to a vote. When you look at how we are going to tackle the healthcare issue around the world, are we really focusing on it on a long-term basis with a long-term plan? No we’re not. The reality is you need all parties — politicians, local communities, and business — and you need more leadership. You can’t allow people to manage by the numbers and the demographics and social media to see what the next big ideas we should follow. It’s definitely important to engage and dissect that info, but it’s more important to take it, step back, and then say this is what we’re doing and explain it to those constituencies and move the ball forward.

  • Sprint’s LTE rollout goes urban with launches in Boston, Austin

    After spending the last six months boosting its small-town cred, Sprint is focusing more 4G attention on larger markets. On Monday it took its LTE network live in Boston and Austin, joining Chicago and Indianapolis, which Sprint turned on right before the Christmas holidays.

    When Sprint first launched LTE this summer, it started with six large cities, but it quickly shifted its focus to smaller cities, towns and suburbs, getting 4G markets online as soon its Network Vision upgrade was complete. Sprint’s LTE network is now live in 58 cities, but most of them are small markets.

    Sprint may be returning to the urban zones, but it isn’t abandoning the places in between. In addition to Boston and Austin, Sprint launched LTE in seven other areas: Bryan/College Station, Texas; Columbia, Tenn.; Emporia, Kan.; Farmington, Mass.; Fort Wayne, Ind.; Gettysburg, Pa.; and Western Puerto Rico (including Aguadilla, Isabela, Cabo Rojo, Mayagüez).

    In fact, Sprint plans to double its current number of LTE markets in the coming months, targeting both big and small areas. Los Angeles, New York City, Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., are all on the list, as are Kerrville, Texas, and Shelby, N.C.

  • Apple makes it easier to find Passbook apps in iOS 6.1 update

    While the promise of Passbook was intriguing, the first release of Apple’s mobile ticket, gift card, coupon and loyalty card repository in September was an underwhelming user experience. It wasn’t listed as a new addition in the release notes, but I was pleased to see in the iOS 6.1 update on Monday that Apple has addressed one of my biggest concerns: helping people understand what Passbook does, why they would want to use it, and where they can find apps that work with Passbook.

    Apple has thankfully restored the Welcome screen to Passbook that explains what it does as well as the vital link “Apps for Passbook” that takes users to a special page in the App Store listing apps that are Passbook compatible. There you’ll find apps from companies like Sephora, Fandango and United, that were available upon launch. But Apple has many more available for download now.

    The change is that Apple has kept this page and accompanying link around permanently: in the initial version of iOS 6, after you downloaded your first Passbook app, the link to the section of the App Store with Passbook-enabled apps disappeared. Simply searching the App Store from the iPhone itself for “Passbook apps” yielded nothing, however. The release lacked Apple’s typical attention to detail, which is why it stuck out as a particularly bad experience.  (For users who already understand the utility of Passbook and want to delete this Welcome pass, there’s also now a button to do that.)

    It’s a small thing, but if Apple truly wants to get its users used to paying for coffee or boarding planes or scanning a baseball game ticket with their iPhone, it’s important to guide them through it.

  • BlackBerry Game Developers: Win Tickets to Quo Vadis and Mentorship Package

    BlackBerry Developer Group Balkan has announced a worldwide BlackBerry game developer challenge. Submit your best game published in the last year on BlackBerry World and you could be one of three winners of business passes to Germany’s biggest game developer conference: Quo Vadis as well as mentorship from two industry veterans.

    To enter, email your submission before February 5th to [email protected] along with your game’s BlackBerry World link with the subject: “Challenge For all Great BlackBerry Game Developers”.

    Free passes to a game developer conference is amazing but the mentorship package featuring Michael Liebe and Dan Romescu is fantastic for any promising game developer.

    Winners will be announced on Dan Romescu’s blog: Augmented Citizen.

    Click here for some good developer community articles at the BlackBerry Developer Group Balkan page.

  • Hip Implants Trial Against Johnson & Johnson Begins

    The first of many lawsuits filed against Johnson & Johnson over the company’s 2010 recall of hip replacements has begun in Los Angeles.

    According to a Reuters report, 66-year-old Loren Kransky is alleging that Johnson & Johnson subsidiary DePuy knew their implants could release metal into patients’ bodies. DePuy contends that Kransky was a life-long smoker with diabetes and kidney cancer, and that the company’s tests did not find that their implants released enough metal to be a health problem.

    Last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a warning about all-metal hip implants. Those types of implants can release small bits of metal particles when patients walk or run while using them. The particles can cause damage to the soft tissue and bone around the implant and joint. The metal debris can also cause adverse reactions in some patients, causing the implant to fail and requiring surgery to replace it. The agency warned doctors against all-metal implants, suggesting instead that alternative hip implants, such as metal-on-polyethylene, ceramic-on-polyethylene, ceramic-on-ceramic, or ceramic-on-metal implants, be used instead.

    Opening arguments in the trial began on January 25. According to Reuters, more than 10,000 lawsuits have been filed since the hip implants were recalled. The recall was a voluntary one by DePuy, and the company also set up a patient reimbursement program to pay for patients’ medical bills and other costs related to the recall.

  • Apple Launches iOS 6.1, Increases LTE Support

    Apple announced today that it has updated iOS to version 6.1, adding LTE capabilities to 36 more iPhone carriers and 23 more iPad carriers around the world. Now, more iPhone 5, iPad Mini and iPad with Retina Display users can utilize faster wireless performance.

    “iOS 6 is the world’s most advanced mobile operating system, and with nearly 300 million iPhone, iPad and iPod touch devices on iOS 6 in just five months, it may be the most popular new version of an OS in history,” said Apple SVP Philip Schiller. “iOS 6.1 brings LTE support to more markets around the world, so even more users can enjoy ultrafast Safari browsing, FaceTime video calls, iCloud services, and iTunes and App Store downloads.”

    According to Apple, iOS users have uploaded over nine billion photos to Photo Stream, sent over 450 billion iMessages and received over four trillion notifications to date.

    iOS 6.1 is now available as a free software update, an dis compatible with the following devices: iPhone 5, iPhone 4S, iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS, iPad (third and fourth generation), iPad mini, iPad 2 and iPod touch (fourth and fifth generation). Still, some features are not available for all products.

    LTE, specifically, is available on iPhone 5, iPad mini and fourth generation iPad Wi-Fi + Cellular models through certain carriers.

  • Facebook Co-Founder Chris Hughes Isn’t Too Keen on Chris Christie

    Last week, we heard that Facebook co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg is set to hold his first-ever political fundraiser at his Palo Alto home. The lucky recipient of the funds? Republican New Jersey Governor Chris Christie.

    But not everyone credited with co-founding the biggest social network in the world is completely on board the Chris Christie endorsement.

    Chris Hughes think that Christie’s stance on gay marriage (current opposition) is cause to “raise serious concerns about supporting someone like him.”

    Here’s what Hughes told ABC News:

    “I, for one, have a lot of questions about Chris Christie, particularly because less than a year ago he vetoed a marriage equality bill in the New Jersey state legislature. Which for me personally, I got married to my husband last June, [it] was just really personally frustrating. I mean, there are tens of thousands of couples in New Jersey that can’t share their love and be recognized under the law because of that decision. I’m not a single issue voter, and I think most people aren’t either, but for me personally, it would raise serious concerns about supporting someone like him.”

    Hughes married his longtime boyfriend Sean Eldridge last July. His wedding was attended by Mark Zuckerberg, Sean Parker, and some other notables including House Minority leader Nancy Pelosi.

    Hughes, along with Zuckerberg, Dustin Moskovitz, and Eduardo Saverin launched Facebook from a Harvard dorm room nearly nine years ago. Hughes is currently the publisher and editor-in-chief of The New Republic.

    Until now, Mark Zuckerberg hasn’t really thrown his weight behind any particular politician. He’s attended dinners with President Obama, and has been linked to Newark, New Jersey’s Democratic mayor Cory Booker. Some Democrats are upset with Zuckerberg over his choice to host the Christie Fundraiser.

    Facebook, as an organization, spreads the money around pretty evenly across both parties when it comes to how they utilize their political action committee, Facebook Inc, PAC. They are also one of the most outspoken pro-LGBT companies around.

  • Talks to celebrate the 200th anniversary of Pride and Prejudice

    Jane-Austen

    Two hundred years ago today, Jane Austen published Pride and Prejudice, the classic tale of Elizabeth Bennett. Though the book has now sold more than 20 million copies worldwide, Austen (above) received £110 for the copyright from publisher T. Egerton, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

    While Pride and Prejudice was published in 1813, just four years before Austen’s death, she lives on in TED Talks. Here, five speakers who’ve mentioned Austen on stage:

  • Andrew Sullivan, Nate Silver and the shifting balance of power for media brands

    It’s still a week before Andrew Sullivan’s new independent site goes live with the subscription-based model he announced earlier this month, and the star political blogger says he has already raised close to $500,000 from readers. Sullivan’s move was like a shot across the bow of traditional media, one that is no doubt being watched closely by many high-profile writers and journalists — such as New York Times statistics blogger Nate Silver, whose contract with the newspaper is coming up for renewal soon. Where will the continents lie after this tectonic shift is over?

    The reality is that individual brands like Sullivan and Silver now arguably have as much or more power as the traditional brands they used to align themselves with. The big question is how outlets like the Times and others will handle that re-balancing of power, and whether they will ultimately win or lose — and with the ongoing decline of print revenue, the stakes for traditional outlets are higher than they have ever been. (Note: We’re going to be discussing this with Sullivan and several other star bloggers at our paidContent Live media conference on April 17 in New York).

    What does the NYT have to offer Nate Silver?

    After announcing his split from The Daily Beast on January 2, Sullivan raised more than $300,000 for his new site in a matter of days, and was widely hailed as the harbinger of a new movement towards reader-supported independent writing. The pace of subscriptions has fallen off sharply (not surprisingly), but he is still signing up readers for his $20-per-year plan, with the latest total being $489,000 according to a recent update:

    6a00d83451c45669e2017d40853839970c-800wi

    Silver hasn’t said much about his plans for the future since his emergence as a blogging superstar during the recent U.S. federal election, when his statistics-based blog — called Five Thirty Eight, after the number of members in the U.S. electoral college — got so much traffic that at one point it accounted for more than 20 percent of all the visits to the entire New York Times website. But he has hinted that he is considering whether to remain with the NYT or strike out on his own.

    And why wouldn’t he consider it? With a book just published to some acclaim, Silver arguably has the kind of personal brand that could be successful as a standalone property like the one Andrew Sullivan is trying to build. And despite the attention the New York Times got from his content during the election, there has been some tension between the newspaper and Silver — including a reprimand from the paper’s public editor over a humorous wager that the blogger wanted to offer to MSNBC host Joe Scarborough on the outcome of the election (a bet that the NYT said was unseemly for a journalist).

    Silver said this incident wasn’t a big deal, and that he appreciates being part of the New York Times. But how much does he really need the NYT, and how much does the NYT need him and others like him? That’s the question at the core of the Sullivan model: at what point does it become more of a hindrance than a benefit to be associated with a traditional media brand?

    If Sullivan can do it, who else might be able to?

    independence day

    There are a number of other bloggers and columnists who could arguably pull off a standalone, Sullivan-style model: New York Times foreign correspondent Nick Kristof, for example, has a huge following through social media like Twitter and Facebook and is a popular author — although whether he would get access to the people and places he needs to access if he were independent is a question mark. Other columnists at the NYT and similar mainstream outlets like Tom Friedman or Ezra Klein could probably make a go of it, as could some writers such as Felix Salmon at Reuters.

    New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson told a media panel on Friday that the newspaper wants to work closely with high-powered writers like Silver, and in the past has used DealBook blogger Andrew Ross Sorkin as a model for what the paper wants to do by building events and other value-added offerings around individuals with star power. But at some point, writers like Sorkin and others are going to ask whether they wouldn’t be better off running such businesses on their own.

    In a sense, this is just the latest evolution of a tension that has existed between traditional media and the web since blogging was invented — writers like our own Om Malik gain a profile in traditional media and then go off to start their own media entities, and some high-profile bloggers like Josh Marshall or Mike Masnick manage to turn their blogs into standalone businesses like Talking Points Memo and Techdirt. It’s a little like the music industry: labels try to nurture star talent, knowing full well that in some cases that talent will leave and go independent.

    And as the music industry has discovered, there is even less incentive for talent to stick around now than there ever has been, and the barriers to entry for those who decide to leave are lower. Sullivan may have been the first over the wall in this latest iteration, but he is unlikely to be the last.

    Post and thumbnail images courtesy of Shutterstock / ollyy and Shutterstock / Allies Interactive

  • OpenNebula open-sources service management layer with enterprise in mind

    OpenNebula, the European answer to the likes of Eucalyptus and OpenStack that counts CERN and China Mobile among its customers, is moving to differentiate itself from competitors by freely releasing OpenNebulaApps, a suite of cloud application management tools that sit on top of its traditional infrastructure management toolkit.

    The OpenNebulaApps tools were previously available only to OpenNebulaPro customers but, according to project director Ignacio Llorente, OpenNebula realized there was more value in opening them up:

    “Most customers are interested in our enterprise support – they want us to provide them with commercial support and a service-level agreement. These components weren’t so important for them, so we realized it was more important for us to release these components to the community, to compete [with OpenStack, Eucalyptus etc].

    “As we are an open-source community, it is much easier for us and our customers to be fully open-source and not to have special add-ons only available for customers. We have a quality assurance process for all open-source technology and also have the community as testers.”

    There are three tools in the OpenNebulaApps collection: AppStage allows automated software stack installation and configuration for virtual machines (VMs); AppFlow is for automatically executing and managing multi-tiered applications that consist of interconnected VMs; and AppMarket lets users build and deploy private marketplaces, so that users can share virtual appliances across multiple OpenNebula instances.

    The suite is being released under the Apache license and will become part of the main OpenNebula distribution. It’s not the first move OpenNebula has made recently to boost enterprise uptake by opening up functionality to more users: a couple of weeks ago, sponsor company C12G said the community would get access to every maintenance release and service pack.

    Llorente described the target users of this latest release as enterprises that see cloud computing as an extension of data center virtualization and that want to, for example, use the VMware hypervisor while avoiding the vCloud VMware component because OpenNebula is “more cost-effective” and supports other hypervisors as well. He suggested that this was a different type of customer from those who want to build an Amazon Web Services-like cloud on-premises.

    “While OpenStack and Eucalyptus can be seen as an open source incarnation of the Amazon cloud model, OpenNebula can be seen as an open source incarnation of the VMware vCloud cloud model,” he explained.

    The open-sourcing of OpenNebulaApps will have some casualties in OpenNebula’s own ecosystem – after all, there’s overlap with projects such as RIM’s Carina environment manager that were designed to run on top of OpenNebula.

    “Yes, this is going to be a problem,” Llorente said. “[Various users] are providing functionality on top of OpenNebula and we are now releasing components with similar functionality, but this is an open ecosystem. Users can decide which solution they want to use.”

  • While we waste four cores, scientists use a million at a time

    Chances are, the quad-core processor powering your desktop computer or high-end laptop is vastly underworked. But it’s not your fault: Writing code that executes in parallel is difficult, so most consumer applications (save for some compute-intensive video games that really need help, for example) continue to run on just one core at a time. Which makes it all the more impressive that a group of Stanford researchers recently ran a jet-engine-noise simulation across 1 million cores simultaneously.

    As anyone even casually familiar with parallel processing knows, running applications across more nodes means jobs execute faster because they’re able to share the computing workload. The more cores, the faster it runs. This what makes Hadoop, for example, so great at processing large chunks of data. The MapReduce framework on which it’s based divvies up the work across nodes and everything they find is stitched back together as the result of a job.

    But even Hadoop can only scale to tens of thousands of nodes and, because of its focus on “nodes,” actually isn’t really good at utilizing multi-core processors to their fullest (expect to hear more about the limitations of Hadoop at our Structure: Data conference March 20-21 in New York). The IBM-built Sequoia supercomputer (housed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) that the Stanford team used consists of 98,304 processors (or nodes), each containing 16 computing cores. That’s a grand total of 1,572,864 cores, and the researchers were able to use the majority of them, which they claim is a record of some sort.

    Sequoia, decomposed

    Sequoia, decomposed

    But record or not, that’s an incredibly complex undertaking. Programming the jet-engine simulation meant figuring out how to divvy the code into more than a million different tasks that could run across tens of thousands of nodes and 16 cores within each of those nodes. If even one of those processes is buggy, it could slow down or ruin the whole simulation.

    Even in the world of supercomputing, where systems now regularly contain hundreds of thousands of cores — some of them special-purpose GPU co-processors — there’s a shortage of programming talent to actually use them all to their fullest potential. As my colleague Stacey Higginbotham explained in some time ago, the world of high-performance computing is hurtling toward exascale computing but a bigger problem than energy-consumption might be finding applications that need that much computing power and the algorithms capable of operating at that scale.

    Still, the implications of advances in parallel programming are huge — like potentially life-altering huge. This is true not only because of the scientific questions we’ll soon be able to answer at speeds inconceivable even a decade ago, but also because of the computing power we’ll all soon be carrying around in our pockets and purses. If you think those multi-core smartphones and tablets are great now because they can run multiple applications at the same time, just wait until their processors are even bigger and badder and we have more applications — photo- and video-editing, computer-aided design, games and who knows what else — that can actually get the most out of them.

  • App.net to launch file storage API so you can host your own photos

    Needless to say, photo ownership is a sticky topic. Just ask all the people who left Instagram in December over Instagram’s terms of service and the question of photo ownership and rights.

    So not surprisingly, one of the biggest champions of personal data ownership and paid services when it comes to social networks is forging an experiment in file storage and ownership. Dalton Caldwell plans to announced Monday that App.net will be launching a file storage API, giving each of its existing users 10 GB of file storage space connected with their accounts, so they can personally host their own photos and files and then authorize App.net apps to access those files.

    App.net launched in the summer of 2012, and it’s still a little unclear exactly how Caldwell’s vision for the network is going to play out. He is currently committed to a paid network strategy where users have access to all the apps created on top of the App.net API, including everything from group texting apps to a network that looks pretty much like Twitter. Developers are paid from users subscription fees based on the popularity of the apps developers build.

    Central to Caldwell’s thesis is that a paid network creates more value for the developers and gives users more ownership over their data and information. For instance, if you have an Instagram or Flickr account, you upload photos to the services which are then hosted on those companies servers even if you retain copies of the photos yourself. With App.net’s storage API, you would host your own photos in the cloud, and give authorization to different apps to access your photos (just as you give an app access to photos on your iPhone’s camera roll, for instance.)

    “It’s like your personal Dropbox,” Caldwell said. “You want to maintain the originals and feel like they’re yours.” He noted that allowing for photo and file apps will be an important part of growing the App.net developer network, which is now fairly focused on text-based apps.

    Caldwell said he thinks moving into photo and file storage will provide App.net developers a good deal of flexibility in what they design with the service’s API, and moves App.net into a potentially more useful and lucrative area for both users and developers.

    “It’s an attempt to get away from some of the downsides of a siloed data storage,” he said.

  • Apple updates iOS 6 with new Siri, iTunes Match features and more LTE coverage

    Apple kicked off this week with its first big update to iOS 6 since it was released in September. iOS 6.1 includes several feature updates related to LTE coverage, Siri, iTunes in the cloud, and advertising.

    The updates:

    • More LTE carrier coverage. CEO Tim Cook announced this was coming on Apple’s earnings call last week.
    • Purchase movie tickets via Siri. You could previously search for movie times via Apple’s voice interface, and get showtime results via Fandango — now you can buy tickets in the same interaction.
    • iTunes Match subscribers can n download individual songs from iCloud.
    • A new button that allows users to reset the Identifier for Advertisers. In iOS 6, Apple tried to wean advertisers off of UDIDs with the new IFA. It also gave users more control over whether their in-app behavior was transmitted to app developers or advertisers.

    The update is available via iTunes or over the air update. iOS 6.1 is available for iPhone, iPad and iPod touch users.

  • German court says the internet is pretty much required for modern life

    The German high court has weighed in on the value of a web connection (as well as faxes and VoIP lines) and determined that the internet is pretty much essential to modern life (hat tip to TechDirt). This puts the German court closer to agencies such as the ITU and countries such as Finland where internet access is considered a right.

    Apparently back in Dec. 2008, a German citizen found himself disconnected from his DSL line because of some error and was stuck without a connection for two months. He sought compensation for his expenses (he spent more time using his mobile phone instead of his wireline VoIP service) as well as €50 ($67) per day he had no connection. He didn’t get that much because the courts felt he was overeaching in seeking compensation from his ISP beyond actual costs for his fax line and VoIP line, but it did send the case back to a lower court telling it to set the fine accordingly.

    The court’s rationale was that so much of modern life is conducted via the internet that going without was worthy of some compensation when it was cut off. A Google translation of the court’s press release notes:

    The internet replaces, because of the easy availability of information, more and more other media, such as encyclopedias, magazines or television. It also allows the global exchange between its users, for example via e-mail, forums, blogs and social networks. In addition, it is increasingly for the initiation and conclusion of contracts, used for making transactions and to fulfill public service obligations. The majority of people in Germany uses the Internet daily.

    The release goes on to say that because of these things it is not easily replaced and essential to modern life. Thus, it sent the case back so the man might get his compensation. In light of AT&T’s massive service failure last week that affected thousands of users, I’m curious how our own court system might view access to the web and what type of compensation — above and beyond a service credit — might be due those affected by multiday outages.

  • Mozilla Was Most Trusted Internet Company For Privacy In 2012

    January 28 is Data Privacy Day. It’s a topic that has become increasingly more important in recent years as more of our information moves to the Internet. Consumers are largely untrusting when it comes to Internet companies, but one has at least earned more trust than others.

    A study from the Ponemon Institute found that Mozilla was the most trusted Internet company for privacy in 2012. The non-profit ranked number one in the Internet & Social Media category and number 20 overall. The study doesn’t detail the competition, but we can assume that Mozilla beat out the likes of Google, Facebook and Twitter.

    In accepting the award, Mozilla says that it doesn’t strive to win awards when it comes to its users’ privacy:

    This is certainly quite a distinction and the product of a user-centric philosophy implemented by contributors to the Mozilla project over the past decade. Engineers, UX designers, security, engagement, IT and privacy folks have made thousands of small decisions over the years that have collectively created the user trust reflected by this survey. This recognition is not something we sought, as we don’t view privacy as an end unto itself, but it’s greatly appreciated given all the complexities and nuances associated with privacy and security today.

    That being said, Mozilla finds that the rankings only detail the inherent distrust consumers have for online services. It hopes that itself and others can fix that perception going forward:

    The rankings have another implication. It means we as an industry all have a lot more work to do. It’s unfortunate that users largely distrust the ecosystem of online service and application providers. What we really want is an environment where those of us developing Internet and social media services and applications deepen trust in a way that empowers and protects users and engenders confidence. We all have to continue our efforts — both big and small — to create a more trustworthy environment of online products that seamlessly integrate ease of use, transparency, and user choice.

    Speaking of other companies, Google and Facebook both detailed new privacy initiatives today to coincide with Data Privacy Day. Google says that it requires search warrants whenever law enforcement requests a user’s information. It also notifies users when their information is being requested. As for Facebook, the company’s Chief Privacy Officer, Erin Egan, will be accepting questions from users to keep the privacy dialog transparent and accessible to all.

  • Twitter Launches New Transparency Report Home, Releases Second Report

    Twitter announced today that it is launching a new Transparency Report home page at transparency.twitter.com. The announcement comes on Data Privacy Day, and the week following the latest release of Google’s Transparency Report.

    Twitter first released a Transparency Report of its own last July, publishing six months of data. We should be seeing these regularly from here on out, but you can go to the new destination anytime.

    Twitter Launches Transparency Report site

    “In addition to publishing the second report, we’re also introducing more granular details regarding information requests from the United States, expanding the scope of the removal requests and copyright notices sections, and adding Twitter site accessibility data from our partners at Herdict,” says Twitter Legal Policy Manager Jeremy Kessel.

    “We believe the open exchange of information can have a positive global impact,” he adds. “To that end, it is vital for us (and other Internet services) to be transparent about government requests for user information and government requests to withhold content from the Internet; these growing inquiries can have a serious chilling effect on free expression – and real privacy implications.”

    Google, in addition to putting out its latest data last week, also addressed data privacy today, highlighting three initiatives that it is focusing on. More on all of that here. Meanwhile, the company is facing new legal action in the UK related to its privacy conduct.

    Additionally, Facebook has launched its “Ask Our CPO” (Chief Privacy Officer) initiative.

  • Facebook’s privacy payout: how you’ll get $10, $5 — or nothing

    If you’re on Facebook, you likely received a mysterious email late on Friday that says you might get some money in a lawsuit. The email is the real deal — Facebook is indeed paying out and you could get up to $10 (maybe). So how do you collect? Here’s a plain English guide to what that email means:

    Why am I part of a Facebook class action in the first place?

    The social network got sued for using you as a product pitchmen for “Sponsored Stories” without your permission. For instance, if I “Liked” Justin Bieber’s page, my Facebook friends might have seen a big ad saying “Jeff likes Beeb’s new eyeliner.” Today, Facebook can still do that because it changed its privacy terms — it’s the earlier ads it’s on the hook for.Facebook like

    How do I collect?

    Go to the settlement page and fill out the claim form by May 2.

    So how much will I get?

    Facebook is paying $20 million all-in to make this go away. Under a revised deal (the judge rejected the first one), Facebook users are eligible for up to $10 each — so long as there’s enough money to go around.

    Oh, and that $20 million isn’t just for Facebook users. The lawyers are asking for nearly $8 million. Then there are people like the “escrow agent” and the “settlement administrator” who get a cut too. If the judge okays all this, it will be more like $10 to $12 million to go around.

    To look at it another way, if there is $12 million left after the lawyers, there is enough money left to pay 1.2 million Facebook users.

    Well, what if more than 1.2 million people make a claim?

    You have to share. If 2 million Facebook users sign up, everyone would get about $6. If 2.4 million sign-up, it’s $5. If more people than that sign up, everyone gets nothing.

    So what are my chances to get some money?

    There are about 165 million Facebook users in America. If even 2 percent decide to make a claim, you’re likely out of luck.

    Well, that doesn’t seem fair. Who gets the money then?

    The class action says it’s not very efficient to cut $4.99 checks to everyone. So, if too many people are eligible, they’re just going to give the money to your friends at Harvard, Stanford, Berkeley and the EFF instead. These groups will then use your money to advocate for privacy.

    Well, damn it. It was my privacy that was violated — don’t I even get to be involved?

    That’s a good question. This keeps happening again and again — Google, Facebook, etc. violate everyone’s privacy and the money from the resulting lawsuit goes to lawyers and a bit of it goes to “charity.”

    To be fair, this isn’t as crazy as it sounds. Many of the privacy advocates do good work and the class action lawyers, even if they’re in it for themselves, do keep the tech companies on their toes.

    The bigger problem here is that these legal deals don’t do a good job of involving the people who are affected. Nor do they produce solutions such as a “pay-for-privacy” option. Would you pay $5 a month for an ad-free, non-creepy version of Facebook? I might. But the class action settlement doesn’t allow us to raise these sort of options or to ask Facebook directly about what they’re doing.

    If I don’t get any money, does any good come out of this lawsuit?

    A bit. The settlement claims it will force Facebook to create a tool to see which products you’re endorsing and to remove your endorsements. But we’ll have to see if this tool will be easy to use in practice.