Blog

  • Is It Possible To Prevent A Volcanic Eruption?

    People have worked out some ways to stop volcanoes erupting.

    In 1919 Americans exploded dynamite in a Mexican volcano and released the pressure that was building in it. In 1943, American planes dropped two bombs in the crater of the volcano at Vesuvius in Italy and stopped it in its tracks.

    Most volcanoes are, however, unstoppable. An eruption can last from a few seconds to a year, even centuries. Stromboli in Italy has erupted every few minutes over the last 2,000 years.

    Some volcanoes erupt all the time. Most volcanoes erupt for three to four weeks and then rest. An eruption will stop naturally as soon as there is no more molten rock, when there is not enough gases in the magma, or when the chimney is plugged with cooled lava.

    Human intervention is costly and is usually only attempted when many human lives would be lost if nothing was done.

  • “Stupid Fight” Measures Which Star Has The Dumbest Fans

    One very clever gent named Tom Scott has created an application that can measure the average level of intelligence of a celebrity’s Twitter fans based on “stupid indicators” in their Tweets.

    “‘Stupid Fight’ is not an exact science, but amazingly it seems to get it right most of the time! A lot of people on Twitter are stupid,” Tom says. “Many of these people follow celebrities and try to send them messages. Stupid Fight can’t go out and administer an intelligence test to each person that’s sending messages to a celebrity. So instead, it estimates based on several stupid indicators,” he continues.

    “Are they using twenty exclamation marks in a row? Do they endlessly use the abbreviation ‘OMG’? Do they seem incapable of working out where their Shift key is? These indicators have a strong correlation with the message, and its sender, being stupid.”

    So, are Lady Gaga fans smarter than Justin Bieber’s? Take a trip to StupidFight.com and see for yourself…


  • Prius “Brand” Expanding to Include a Mini-Minivan

    New MPV to use Lithium-ion Battery Pack
    Canadian Auto Press

    There have been rumours for more than a year about a new Prius brand taking shape, a move by Toyota that would capitalize on the world’s best-known hybrid nameplate, an icon for the green movement.

    Toyota Hybrid X concept

    Toyota Hybrid X concept

    Now we’re starting to get information about the new model via Reuters news agency, which is quoting Japanese daily Nikkei. The new model, a mini-minivan, dubbed MPV in global markets, is an ideal configuration for a hybrid drivetrain. Its five- to seven-occupant layout via two- to three-row seating maximizes people and cargo carrying capability which, combined with dimensions that are smaller than Toyota’s Sienna or any of the North American-bound minivans makes for an environmental footprint with less impact than even the current Prius hatchback.

    The new Prius MPV will be the first in Toyota’s hybrid lineup to use a lithium-ion battery pack unless the plug-in Prius arrives on the market sooner, according to Nikkei; both will feature an “in-house” developed battery in as far as it will be developed by Toyota and strategic partner Panasonic Corp. Toyota will manufacture the new batteries at its Teiho factory in Aichi Prefecture, but later is expected to migrate battery manufacturing to their joint venture company, Panasonic EV Energy Co.

    The expectation is for the new model to join the Prius hatchback sometime next year as a 2012 model, but it’s still too early to nail down a delivery date or much else about the new model for that matter. All we know is that it will be a “competitively priced Prius hybrid minivan” according to the Reuters report.

    Competitively priced Prius models in mind, Reuters also speculated on a smaller lower priced entry-level Prius model based on the FT-CH concept that surfaced at the Geneva show in 2007. Nothing is known of this possibility outside of the Toyota executive and product planning inner circle, but normally such talk is not without reason. As soon as the second Prius model surfaces, we’ll know that an entire Prius lineup is on the way.












  • 12 piezoelectric systems for green environment

    piezoelectric sidewalks_r1bw5_69_lasuo_5638

    Electricity, as we all know, isn’t easy to generate and even the power that reaches our wall sockets isn’t always green. In an era where everybody seems to be getting interested about renewable energy, there is no dearth of systems that harvest seemingly unconventional forms of energy like kinetic energy, human energy and piezoelectricity. Piezoelectricity is based around the ability of some materials, notably crystals and certain ceramics, to generate electrical field in response to applied mechanical stress. Though piezoelectricity doesn’t seem practical enough for portable electronic devices, certain designers are working to make it feasible not only for portable gadgets but also on a much larger scale. Here is a list of 12 such systems that rely on next-gen piezoelectric technologies which might well be the future of clean energy:

    (more…)

  • How Did Johnny Cash Die?

    Johnny Cash was an infamous country rock singer from the USA. He became ill in 1997, when he was diagnosed with the degenerative disease Shy-Drager syndrome, (a rare, progressively degenerative disease of the autonomic nervous system.)

    This diagnosis however was later altered to autonomic neuropathy associated with diabetes (affecting mostly the internal organs such as the bladder muscles.) Cash’s illness forced him to give up his touring circuit.

    He was hospitalized in 1998 with severe pneumonia. He died on 12 September 2003 just three days after being discharged from Baptist Hospital in Nashville, Tennessee, following a bout of pancreatitis.

    Cash was inducted into the Country Music Hall of Fame in 1980 and the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1992. Two years before his death, in 2001, he received the National Medal of the Arts for artistic excellence.

  • Keys That Could’ve Saved the Titanic Sold For $137k [Titanic]

    Thanks to the volcanic ash grounding European planes, sea-travel might just become the new way to skip between countries, making this Saturday’s £90,000 auction of the keys to the binocular cabinet on the Titanic all the more poignant. More »







  • Diferente

    Diferentele intre femei si barbati ?
    S-au scris carti in legatura cu acest subiect insa una dintre cele mai mari diferente este aceasta : femeile i-au decizii in functie de ceea ce simt (partea “emotionala” a creierului) in timp ce barbatii se bazeaza pe logica (partea “logica” a creierului).

    Din acest motiv barbatii, de cele mai multe ori, nu inteleg femeile !
    Un caz concret : o femeie foarte frumoasa, inteligenta, care poate avea orice barbat vrea, are o relatie cu un “personaj” urat, fara bani, si care, din punct de vedere al barbatilor n-ar putea iesi in oras nici cu un cactus.

    Barbatul (partea logica) : “Ce proasta ! Uita-te cu cine iese ! Un “terminat” fara bani, fara loc de munca si pe langa toate mai arata si ca ce vomit eu cand beau prea mult …O terminata de masina are, dar o face pe saraca fata sa mearga pe jos … Bani nu are … O scoate in oras doar cand mai apare o eclipsa de luna sau de soare… Apropo de raschitura aia de masina! Macar atat! Merge dupa ea si stau in masina pana se plictisesc. Ce mai… Isi merita soarta!”

    Femeia (partea emotionala) : “Ies cu X de 2 luni. Stiu ca nu are bani, loc de munca sau ca nu arata prea bine. Dar imi place cum ma simt in preajma lui. De fiecare data cand sunt cu el parca uit de toate problemele. Are grija de mine. Nu e genul ala patetic care sa ma pupe in fund din 5 in 5 minute, care sa-mi faca cadouri scumpe, sa ma plimbe cu nu stiu ce masina scumpa prin nu stiu ce cluburi selecte …
    Se gandeste mereu la mine si cand ma astept mai putin imi spune ca ma iubeste. Stie cand gresesc si nu se teme sa ma pune la punct.Nu ii pasa de ce cred ce-i din jurul lui… Desi are o perioada mai proasta stiu ca are potential si poate sa faca lucruri marete, iar eu o sa stau langa sa-l ajut …”

    Concluziile le trageti singuri !

    P.S Inca un exemplu pentru ceea ce am spus. Clipul este din filmul «Sleepless in Seattle». Ea : Povesteste un film si spune ce a simtit cand l-a vazut .
    Ei : Povestesc un film si …fac misto de sentimente :)).
    Urmariti-l pana la capat !

    Trimite si prietenilor:





    Related posts:

    1. Barbati sub papuc
    2. Ziua Femeilor
    3. Gheo
  • Another Facebook Connect Competitor, Meebo’s XAuth

    The web is all about the social component these days. It’s not just the obvious services, Facebook, Twitter and the likes, every site out there is trying to tap into your social graph and extend its functionality based on that. One thing that always happens when a group of people come together is ‘sharing’ information. This is … (read more)

  • 2012 Volkswagen Golf 7 new renderings

    Volkswagen Golf 7 renderings

    These Volkswagen Golf 7 renderings show more links again to the Volkswagen Scirocco design, suggesting that the 2012 Golf generation will have a sporty style. We know that it will have a lower and wider body with a sloping windshield design. Despite this sports focus, the new Golf will be even more environmentally friendly that it already is, continuing the larger BlueMotion philosophy currently driving Volkswagen models.

    The new Golf 7 will have both hybrid and electric models, of which the former is expected to make up 20 percent of the annual one million units. The TwinDrive hybrid technology combines three electric motors with a 1.5-litre diesel unit for a range of 48 km when in electric mode only.

    Other new features include a new entry-level, 1.2-litre engine with 86 hp, and we should also see the seven-speed DSG gearbox appear. Sales are expected to start in 2013 after a 2012 launch. Thanks to Jezza for the tip.

    Volkswagen Golf 7 renderings

    Volkswagen Golf 7 renderings Volkswagen Golf 7 renderings

    Source | Steering News


  • Pearson’s Secret Startups: ‘We Can’t Be Right First Time’


    Genevieve Shore

    When we first showed a video of Penguin Books’ iPad concepts last month, observers got pretty excited about the possibilities. Now, we are told, the first “book” – if you can call it that – Penguin will release from the line-up will be a title about little puppy Spot.

    At a group briefing together with Penguin UK’s digital MD Anna Rafferty, parent Pearson’s digital strategy director Genevieve Shore explained that her commercial approach to tablets, like many digital forms, can be deliberately iterative

    “The interesting thing about pricing on iPad is,” Shore said, “I’m trying to get everybody over the idea that we’ll be right first time. With static content, we spend a lot of time thinking about the right price, and then have to stick with that price. The beauty of these platforms is, we can change it.

    “It allows us to think about extension services – it’s not about trying to jam a service in to a small device.”

    Speaking about mobile, Shore said: “It’s sort of a phony war. Once you dig down beneath wallpapers and ringtones, the myth of mobile content revenue has been exposed over the last couple of years. But I really think this is going to be the year we’ll see that change.”

    More broadly, she said: “We are very focused on M&A digitally. We’re definitely looking to make investments in external startups.” Pearson (NYSE: PSO) has previously partnered with the LiveMocha language learning startup and formed a Mobiledu JV with Nokia (NYSE: NOK) to deliver e-learning to Chinese mobile phones.

    Now Pearson has been forming “internal startups” recently, Shore said. “Traditionally, we’ve been allowed to develop things with longer lead times, over 24 months. We’ve got a number of startups in play which you’ll hear about over the next couple of years, where we take people out of their normal jobs and let them work in a more classic startup environment.”

    But Shore wouldn’t detail the “NewCos” further. Pearson recently became a founder sponsor of TechHub, the Silicon Roundabout, London, co-working environment for digital entrepreneurs.

    Pearson took £1.7 billion revenue from digital products in 2009 – that’s 31 percent of group income and growing 19 percent a year. It claims 35 million children playing its games daily, while Penguin is turning its Spinebreakers teen bookreaders’ community in to a “full social network”. “It’s about future-proofing our business because we don’t want to stop our readers from reading,” Rafferty said.

    We write frequently on how Pearson’s Financial Times is faring in these regards. “Too many people are talking about surviving and we think they should be talking about thriving,” FT.com managing director Rob Grimshaw said. “If you are a producer of text content and you have a new channel available, there ought to be an advantage to your business – there should be a very bright future. We can create a bigger, better more profitable FT than we’ve ever had before on the internet. The odd model with somthing to prove is actually the free model.”


  • Pano iPhone App Takes Panorama Shots For Even Less Money Than Before [IPhone Apps]

    Snap panoramic photos on your iPhone for extra-cheap over the next couple of days, with Pano reducing their usual $3 charge to $1. They’ve just released version 4.0 too; with an even better UI and faster shooting-time. More »







  • Free Audio Recorder 6.0.5

    Free Audio Recorder 6.0.5

    Free Audio Recorder is an absolutely FREE audio & sound recorder.

    Features:

    • Supports multiple sound input, audio/video files playback, CD player, line in, microphone, internet radio, even the obsolete tape/VHS cassette or anything else.
    • Record various sound input to WAV, MP3 and OGG.
    • CD quality audio recording.
    • Extremely resource friendly, CPU usage is below 1% on some new computers.
    • It uses latest Lame MP3 encoder which is generally believed as the the best MP3 encoder in the world.
    • On-the-fly recording, no temporary file generated.
    • Intuitive output file management.
    • Diagnose and print detailed sound device info.
    • Supports majority of modern sound cards: multi channel/professional/external USB sound cards.
    • Supports several sound cards at the same system.
    • All events are logged for future diagnosis.
    • Windows XP/Vista compatible and works with Windows 7 (32-bit and 64-bit).

    Homepage: http://www.freeaudiorecorder.net/
    Download: FreeAudioRecorderSetup.exe
    File Size: 1.26MB


    Related posts:


    Copyright © 2008
    Best Freeware Blog | Buy Laptop | Business Software Reviews | astaga.com lifestyle on the net

  • JRC Annual report 2009 now available

    JRC Annual report 2009

    The JRC Annual Report 2009, published today, provides an overview of the activities, accomplishments and resources related to the JRC’s work carried out in 2009.

    In 2009, the JRC took on the challenge of reinvigorating its organisation by the creation of a new vision and strategy for 2010-2020, which are expected to be approved by mid-2010.

    In this year’s Annual Report, various examples from the JRC’s policy support work are presented, including examples of crisis response as well as input to the various stages of the policy cycle, from anticipation and formulation to policy adoption, implementation and evaluation. The report also presents highlights of the JRC Institutes’ work in 2009.

  • The Global War on Tribes

    CounterPunch has an article on modern resource wars being conducted against tribal groups – The Global War on Tribes.

    The so-called “Global War on Terror” is quickly growing outside the borders of Iraq and Afghanistan, into new battlegrounds in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and beyond. The Pentagon is vastly increasing missile and gunship attacks, Special Forces raids, and proxy invasions–all in the name of combating “Islamist terrorism.” Yet within all five countries, the main targets of the wars are predominantly “tribal regions,” and the old frontier language of Indian-fighting is becoming the lexicon of 21st-century counterinsurgency. The “Global War on Terror” is fast morphing into a “Global War on Tribes.”

    Tribal regions are local areas where tribes are the dominant form of social organization, and tribal identities often trump state, ethnic, and even religious identities. Tribal peoples have a strongly localized orientation, tied to a particular place. Their traditional societies are based on a common culture, dialect, and kinship ties (through single or multiple clans). Although they are tribal peoples, they are not necessarily Indigenous peoples–who generally follow nature-centered spiritual and cultural systems. Nearly all tribal communities in the Middle East and Central Asia have been Islamicized or Christianized, but they still retain their ancient social bonds.

    Yet modern counterinsurgency doctrine only views tribal regions as festering cauldrons of lawlessness, and “breeding grounds” for terrorism, unless the tribes themselves are turned against the West’s enemies. The London Times (1/5/10), for example, crudely asserts that Yemen’s “mountainous terrain, poverty and lawless tribal society make it… a close match for Afghanistan as a new terrorist haven.” This threatening view of tribal regions is, of course, as old as European colonialism itself. …

    Whether in Mexico, India, Iraq, or the United States and Canada, the Global War on Tribes has some common characteristics. First, the war is most blatantly being waged to steal the natural resources under tribal lands. The rugged, inaccessible terrain that prevented colonial powers from eliminating tribal societies also made accessing minerals, oil, timber and other resources more difficult–so (acre for acre) more of the resources are now left on tribal lands than on more accessible lands.

    Resources are not always the underlying explanation for war, but they’re a pretty good start at an explanation. In the case of Indigenous tribal peoples, their historic attention to biodiversity has also enabled natural areas to be relatively protected until now, as corporations seek out the last remaining pockets of natural resources to extract. Look no further than the Alberta Tar Sands, for instance, to see the exploitation of Native lands by modern oil barons.

    Like in Avatar, Native peoples often resist the militarization brought by corporate invaders seeking to mine “unobtainium,” and they don’t need a white messiah riding a red dragon to guide them to victory. In his book Resource Rebels: Native Challenges to Mining and Oil Corporations, Al Gedicks notes, “Up until recently, the tendency in the mass media has been to stereotype native people as fighting a losing battle against the onslaught of industrial civilization. But after two decades of organizing local, national, regional and international alliances, assisted by…the Internet, native voices can no longer be ignored in powerful places” (p. 1).

    Second, the Global War on Tribes is a campaign against the very existence of tribal regions that are not under centralized state control. The tribal regions still retain forms of social organization that has not been solely determined by capitalism. In her anthology Paradigm Wars, Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, Chair of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, comments that “promoters of economic globalization, the neocolonizers, use the overwhelming pressure of homogenization to teach us that indigenous political, economic and cultural systems are obstacles to their ‘progress.’” (p. 14).

    The point is not that all tribal peoples pose an egalitarian alternative to neoliberal capitalism. Some (such as Indigenous peoples) certainly do have strong egalitarian principles, but many other tribal peoples –such as in the new conflict zones–certainly do not (particularly toward women). The salient point is not that all tribal cultures are paradise, but that they are not capitalist, and neoliberal capitalism cannot stand anything other than Total Control.

    Third, the collective form of organization enables tribal peoples to fight back against state control and corporate globalization. When I asked Arundhati Roy at a Seattle forum (3/29/10) why counterinsurgency wars seem to be focused on tribal regions, she answered that tribal peoples do not have a “bar-coded” view of the world. Tribes still have the social networks to defend their lands and ways of life—networks of trust anchored in deeply held values that citizens of urban industrial society generally lack.

    Speaking of Arundhati Roy, she’s in a little trouble over her recent article on the Naxalite rebellion in India – Author investigated over rebel ties.

    A Booker Prize-winning author is facing a police investigation over her links with Maoist insurgents behind the massacre of more than 70 soldiers.

    Police in Chhattisgarh, central India, confirmed they had ordered an investigation into Arundhati Roy’s comments in a magazine article in which she outlines her sympathy for the Maoist insurgency.

    Her comments brought an official complaint from a local activist under the Chhattisgarh Special Public Security Act 2005 who claims the article was intended to drum up support for the Maoists. She can be held for several years without bail and jailed for two years if found to have violated the act.

    Since her novel The God of Small Things won the Booker Prize in 1997, Roy has campaigned for the rights of India’s tribal people who have been ousted from their land to make way for mines, factories, roads and dams. …

    In a statement to an Indian newspaper, Roy denied her article had glorified the Maoists, and said the investigation was an attempt to ”cordon off the theatre of war and choke the flow of critical information coming out of the forests”.

    Roy was jailed in New Delhi in 2007 for contempt of court over a protest against a dam project in the Narmada Valley.


  • Human Chromosome Fusion





    An unusual theory regarding the emergence of modern humanity has been promoted for many years and is occasionally addressed by enthusiasts.  A major source of this theory is Sitchen who has drawn it from his learned interpretation of ancient scriptures.
    As the story goes an advanced alien society on planet X passes this way every few millennia.  They established a presence on Earth motivated by the need to acquire gold.  Their presence occurs in the earliest scriptures and is commented on.  In order to mine the gold, they chose to upgrade a species of humanoid into modern humanity.
    This first is an extraordinary claim.  After saying that, I observe one other issue.  It is a scriptural interpretation based on a Bronze Age assemblage of writings.  Care must be exercised before we accept anything beyond the basic ideas themselves because of the introduction of cultural inputs.
    It takes no effort to imagine a contact event been written up in the glorious language of a Bronze Age war chief.
    If anything, my own work has actually built additional meat on this skeleton.
    To start with I have posted on the orbit of the sun through the cluster related to Sirius over a 100,000 year or so cycle.  Such a path could easily put us in close contact with an alien civilization each trip.  It would also explain why such a planet X might even be possible.  So a completely far fetched proposition drawn from controversial scriptural interpretations becomes possible to consider.
    I have also additionally posted on the proposition that human ancestors developed a modern population that technically matured over 15,000 years ago during the Ice Age.  They decided to end the Ice Age by inducing a crustal shift and executed accordingly.  In the process they transitioned to space humanity who we recognize today in the form of ET.
    Much of this is supported in scriptural sources and the rest can be built up by inference and physical evidence.  It provides a framework that places modern humanity on Earth after been cloned into existence from our primate ancestors at some early point.  I find 400 K years as unnecessarily long and completely unsupported in the fossil record, yet it cannot be discounted at all Our fossil record is far too scant.
    However, the past twenty thousand years covering the end of the Ice Age works is completely plausible and fills an implied gap in the natural rise of modern humanity.  After all if we have done everything inside of 10,000 years, what were we doing for the previous 70 K at least?
    For all these reasons it becomes plausible that the conversion of our primate precursors to modern humanity may have been accelerated as early as three to five orbital cycles ago or as much as 500,000 years ago.  All evidence would be buried in the tropics and be very deep.  I prefer to accept that the rise of humanity was unaided and to some degree the fossil record supports that interpretation.  Yet the repopulation of the Earth after the crustal shift is recent and was surely done by humans themselves and with any number of local colonies sporting separate racial types.
    With this background of interpretation, you are equipped to read this item prepared by Michael Tellinger who is preparing a book on the subject.  It has taken myself years to assemble the sources and resolve underlying issues to put together an internally possible history that is not instantly in contravention of physical science and probabilities.  So while I am not thrilled to see time pushed back over half a million years when I can get it all done inside the 100,000 years that the fossil record presently gives us, I am also cognizant of the reality that earlier has always proven better.
    I underline what I find helpful.
    The idea that humanity was created as a slave to work comes out through the cultural lens of Sumerian Tablets.  A better interpretation is that we were engineered to complete the task of terraforming the Earth and that is the purpose we live for.  If in fact we caused the crust to shift, then we are well on the way to completing the task.  I am also not convinced that the gold aspect of the tale I anything more than a cultural artifact.
    Here is another edition of my weekly article series. We explore evidence of genetic manipulation of the earliest humans. I will keep the articles as fresh and up to date with the latest scientific discoveries as possible. I hope to point out to you where this new information is slipping through the cracks of mainstream scholars and academics, while it supports many of the so-called outlandish theories about our human origins. Enjoy the read and please register your friends that may also have similar interests at the end of the article.
    Chromosome Fusion
    Evidence of DNA manipulation in our distant past?
    The Human Genome Project has dished up some real surprises to scientists. The first surprise was the vast percentage of the human DNA that is inactive. It is estimated that at least 97% of our DNA is in actual fact a waste of space, as it does not contain any active genes that actually carry the code for any of our physical makeup. Then within the genes there are Introns – parts that do not carry any code; and Exons – sections that carry some sort of genetic code.  The full length of our DNA is made up of some 20 000 genes that have now been identified. These genes carry the blueprint for the structure of our entire body. What is very puzzling is the fact that Homo sapiens, as the supposed pinnacle if civilized evolution on this planet, should have such large parts of unused DNA. We seem to have the longest DNA molecule among all other species, but we use the smallest part of it in proportion to the other species. In other words, all the other creatures use much more of their DNA than humans do. Some species use as much as 98% of their DNA.
    This flies directly in the face of the principles of evolution. Humans should have the most complex and evolved DNA of all creatures, to have reached levels of civilization seemingly much higher than any other species on Earth over millions of years of evolution. What is even more curious is the predicted number of genes in species. The numbers seem to increase steadily from basic organisms to the most advanced. We would expect that humans should end up having most genes, but strangely this is not the case. Here are some examples of the predictions for total number of genes in species. Fruit Fly 21 000; Zebrafish 50 000; Chicken 76 000; Mouse 81 000; Chimp 130 000; Human 68 000.
    Can you see the problem here? The Chimp is supposed to be our closest known genetic relative and yet it has almost twice as many genes as humans. New research has revealed that Dolphin DNA is very closely related to humans. This will not be surprising to those who have studied the work of Drumvalo Malchiezedek.

    But then we get to the anomaly of the chromosomes. Our DNA is broken up into 23 pairs of chromosomes. By comparison, all apes have 24 pairs. One would expect that Homo erectus, our immediate evolutionary precursor would then also have had 24 chromosome pairs.

    In April 2005, researchers from the National Human Genome Research Institute announced that “A detailed analysis of chromosomes 2 and 4 has detected the largest “gene deserts” known in the human genome and uncovered more evidence that human chromosome 2 arose from the fusion of two ancestral ape chromosomes” as reported in Nature. It is also the second largest chromosome we possess and it seems to make no sense why 2 primordial chromosomes should have merged to make us human, if this new chromosome gives us no apparent advantage for survival.
    So when we read in the Sumerian tablets that humans were cloned as a sub-species between Homo erectus and a more advanced human-like species that arrived on Earth some 445 000 years ago, it suddenly makes a little bit more sense. The tablets describe how our maker removed certain parts of the “Tree of life” to trim the ability of the new “creature” and how they struggled to make the perfect “primitive worker” so that it could understand commands but not be too smart to question their existence. Similar suggestions of genetic cloning are made in The Koran and Hindu Laws of Manu. 
    The Koran:
    •         Ya Sin: “Is man not aware that We created him from a little germ?”
    •         The Believers – God says almost verbatim what the Sumerian tablets tell us. “We first created man from an essence of clay; then placed him a living germ in a secure enclosure. The germ we made a clot of blood, and the clot a lump of flesh. This we fashioned into bones, then clothed the bones with flesh…”
    Laws of Manu:
    •         19. But from minute body (-framing) particles of these seven very powerful Purushas springs this (world), the perishable from the imperishable.
    •         20. Among them each succeeding (element) acquires the quality of the preceding one, and whatever place (in the sequence) each of them occupies, even so many qualities it is declared to possess.
    Notice the reference to “We” by the creator. The cloning of humans as a more primitive worker or “lulu amelu” suddenly does not seem so far fetched and the strange genetic anomalies seem to support some genetic manipulation in our distant past. The modern-day researchers go further to say that this “fusion” of our chromosome 2, is what makes us human.
    Are we getting closer to proving that humans were created by his MAKER as slaves to work in the early gold mines on Earth? It certainly seems like it.
    Please click here to share my articles with your friends who you know will appreciate them.
    Keep Exploring
    Michael Tellinger.
  • Massachusetts is the Unsung Hotbed for Video Games, MIT Conference Panelists Say

    MITBIG
    Erin Kutz wrote:

    When it comes to the video game industry in Massachusetts, “we have a major brand problem,” says Jason Schupbach, the creative economy industry director of the Massachusetts Department of Business Development.

    “We have an amazing technology community here, but we don’t have a huge history of consumer-facing brands being based here,” he said at a panel discussion on Friday at the MIT Sloan Business in Gaming conference.

    The result? The state’s $2 billion video game industry isn’t growing at the rate it could be. Massachusetts’ many colleges produce a slew of talented gaming professionals with skills in both the development and design facets of the industry, but many graduates flee to states more better known for creating hit video games, like California, panelists said.

    Many of the Massachusetts technology companies focus on the infrastructure side of video games, and don’t have the flash of the consumer-focused companies that make big names like World of Warcraft or the Halo franchise. Massachusetts companies, by comparison are “really unsexy. A lot of the great talent wants to work for sexy businesses,” said Brian Balfour, co-founder and VP of product marketing at Viximo, a company that provides virtual goods products for social networking, online dating, and casual gaming sites.

    “It’s almost like ‘I want to graduate and move to the big leagues,’” said panelist and former Red Sox pitcher Curt Schilling, who founded a gaming and entertainment company, 38 Studios, in Maynard, MA in 2006. (This was one of many baseball references he used during the roundtable. Schilling also likened state tax assistance for the video game industry to “steroids” for the economy, in the way that a similar film tax credit has brought movie makers to the state and boosted local businesses.)

    Schilling, who had the ability to self-fund his company to the tune of $30 million, said the lack of financial support at the government level for gaming could deter young startups in the space. “If this state doesn’t find a way to bring tax credits to this industry, the best possible scenario is that this industry will stagnate,” he said. But tax credits are only a piece of the puzzle, he continued. Tax incentives in the form of payroll breaks wouldn’t affect small, young startups, which could better benefit from subsidized office space and grants, he said.

    Schupbach, who Wade interviewed in October (and who will be leaving his position in May for a post in Washington, D.C.), said the state’s financial woes would most likely prevent it from offering a tax break to the industry in the next few years. Still, he says startup programs such as business plan competition MassChallenge, as well as startup workspaces and incubators, could spur more video game companies to get started in the state.

    Panelists also noted that non-compete agreements at startups, which prevent employees from seeking jobs at competing companies for a fixed amount of time, have stalled the industry. The hiring clauses are not enforceable in California, making it easier for people to switch jobs, which helps the state recruit and retain video game developers. “Why would they come here [to Massachusetts] to have handcuffs slapped on them?” asked Bob Ferrari, vice president of global publishing and business development at Sanrio Digital, a company focused on social gaming and the publishing of interactive entertainment for the Hello Kitty brand. He’s also VP of business development at the company’s joint venture partner, Typhoon Games.

    But, this is a problem that the industry doesn’t need lawmakers to fix, and can tackle at a grassroots level, Ferarri and others said. Even though it is legal in Massachusetts to use those clauses, startups and their investors should stop requiring employees to sign non-compete agreements, the panelists said.

    UNDERWRITERS AND PARTNERS



























  • Silent stopwatch

    This is just a quick tip for psychologists who want a silent or beepless stopwatch, as they are very easy to make.

    Stopwatches are often used when psychologists do neuropsychological assessments as they involve the timing of participant responses. Beeps can sometimes be distracting, especially to people who may have brain injury or might be emotionally disturbed, so many assessments recommend stop watches that don’t beep every time you press a button.

    Surprisingly, few actually have this option and I keep seeing online discussions about where to get a silent stopwatch. It’s no coincidence that one of the few that allows you to switch off the beep is most commonly sold with books about psychological assessment.

    However, you can make virtually any stopwatch silent very easily. If you unscrew the back – you may need a smaller ‘watchermakers’ or ‘jeweller’s screwdriver’ like this one – on the back plate you can see the the piezoelectric speaker (the circular metal disc – on the left in the image). Just cover it with tape and voila! you have a silent stopwatch.

    Cheaper than commercially available devices with silent options and works with every stopwatch I’ve found so far.

  • Governor General Michaelle Jean Attacks Contemporary Slavery





    Up to about a year or so ago, I also thought that slavery had been largely outlawed and stamped out worldwide.  After all that is what we have all been taught for decades.
    Notwithstanding that the system of mandatory service without reward for starvation wages as operated by communism was indistinguishable from outright slavery with only the need for private sale eliminated.
    Slavery is an apparent outcome in societies still lacking proper monetization and largely relying on subsistence agriculture.  Often the only source of wealth, meager as it may be, is another’s labor.  So that it lingers in places is really not surprising.
    Then we have criminal slavery in which young women are bought or seized to be placed into the sex trade.  A vulnerable young girl deliberately hooked on drugs in our own culture for the sex trade has been enslaved. Elsewhere it is simply cheaper but the same thing.
    Yet we can at least start with the stamping out of mere economic slavery.  No nation can afford to have any part of its labor force illiterate and largely dependent through simple ignorance.  Yet we have just that is many parts of Africa, parts of India and South east Asia.  This is where slavery still thrives.
    Even developing nations have occasional outbreaks. 
    Anyway, Michelle Jean has brought unwelcome attention to the problem in Senegal which really deserves the attention.
    Plenty of societies and governments continue to ignore the problem and pay lip service to solutions.  The UN needs to be goaded into addressing this particular issue rather than fantasies of global governance.
    GG draws attention for declaring slavery an ongoing practice in Africa
    Fri Apr 16, 5:59 PM
    By Alexander Panetta, The Canadian Press
    GOREE ISLAND, Senegal – First she drew attention in Africa for bluntly declaring that slavery remained widespread, and then Gov. Gen. Michaelle Jean visited a dungeon with a dark past to illustrate her point Friday.
    Jean’s statement about the plight of children in Senegal was widely reported by media in that country, where an in-depth survey has concluded that at least 50,000 boys are being exploited and frequently beaten at their religious schools.
    Her sentiments are supported by a new report from Human Rights Watch, an organization that also describes as “slavery” a common Senegalese custom: Islamic schools that send children out to beg for money all day, then often beat them when they don’t return with enough cash.
    The country’s so-called talibes, boys as young as four, can be seen wandering through traffic in tattered clothes and pleading for money. Because charity is considered a religious duty, people hand over enough donations to make the schoolmasters wealthy by local standards.
    Jean’s visit made the front page of several newspapers Friday.
    “Exploitation of Children In Senegal: Michaelle Jean Calls It Slavery,” was one headline in Le Quotidien newspaper, the day after Jean surprised some journalists at the presidential palace by making that assessment at a joint press conference with the country’s president.
    Human-rights groups estimate that as many as 27 million people live in modern-day slavery – and that there are more slaves in the world now than at any point in human history.
    They include unpaid labourers who work for room and board, women forced into the sex trade, underage soldiers, and child workers who are paid a pittance.
    The UN’s High Commission on Human Rights has suggested a variety of means to fight the problem, including product boycotts and mandatory labelling of goods in industries – like carpet-weaving – where child exploitation has been a problem.
    This week’s report on Senegal by Human Rights Watch urged the Senegalese government to better regulate religious schools, which are popular because they offer the promise of a free education.
    As she visited a former slave-trading centre Friday, Jean used the occasion to illustrate her point for the second day in a row.
    She was received jubilantly by dancing and singing locals on Goree Island. Now a pastel-coloured tourist destination and UN World Heritage Site, the French used this island to imprison slaves traded for guns and alcohol.
    Jean toured the former prison where slaves were once chained to walls by their necks; where children were crammed, in the words of her tour guide, “like fish in a sardine can,” with 150 kids crowded into a separate dungeon half the size of a bowling alley; where men were sold for the price of a barrel of rum, while women fetched the same price if they had attractive physical attributes.
    “These captives were not considered human beings,” said Jean’s guide, Eloi Coly.
    “They were considered merchandise.”
    People had their names taken away, and were assigned a number. They were marched down a stone hallway through the infamous “Door of No Return,” then loaded onto ships that carried them on a three-month – often fatal – journey to the new world.
    A teary-eyed Jean, after the tour, said descendents of former slaves and former slave-owners can work together today on a common cause: ending modern-day slavery.
    “This place is not about the history of black peoples. It’s about us all,” Jean told Canadian and Senegalese journalists.
    “Whether we are of European descent, and probably related to those who committed that crime of slavery and slave trade, or whether we are of African descent, we all belong to that history.”
    She delivered a similarly contemporary message four years ago during a visit to Ghana. During a visit to a similar prison there, she knelt on the ground and broke into sobs, then waved off a question about what special meaning the place carried for someone like her, the descendant of African slaves.
    Jean repeated Friday that it would be a mistake to view slavery uniquely through the prism of African history.
    “It’s about us all. And it’s about how life can triumph over barbarism. And we must stand together today, to really fight every situation that denies rights, dignity and humanity to people in the world today. Slavery is still a fact today, in so many different ways,” she said.
    “Human-trafficking, injustices, are still a reality today. But we are together – and we can say no to it. It’s a responsibility.”
    On Friday, Jean also addressed a school where Canadian aid money has helped train young Senegalese journalists over the years and, on the second full day of her 10-day trip to Africa, she met with a women’s group after touring Goree’s House of Slaves.
    Just outside that old prison, young Amadou Guisse spends the whole day working. He started three years ago, when he was only 10. Guisse follows tourists onto a ferry and, to earn a few dollars on the ride back and forth from the capital, Dakar, he goes around the boat urging tourists to let him shine their shoes.
    Guisse shook his head when asked whether he keeps any of the money he earns.
    “It’s for my family,” he said. “Everything.”
  • Toyota Prius Minivan Coming in Early 2011

    According to the Nikkei report, Toyota will finally release a minivan based upon its popular Prius platform come 2011. Rumor of the vehicle has been circling the web for over a year now. If it’s true–which I kind of think it is–this new vehicle will be the first to don the Prius family nameplate.

    Earlier this year, at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Toyota made it known that a Prius family was in the works during the unveiling of its FT-CH concept. The FT-CH is Yaris-sized Prius which means a hybrid minivan would easily balance out the line up. (more…)

  • Gods and Monsters





    In case you wondered what is wrong with airborne assault this should make it pretty clear.  The actual decision is not been make by the officer in charge on the ground with his eyeballs fully engaged on the target.
    Instead he is dependent on a subordinate totally.
    Mistakes are always made in war.  This merely makes those mistakes many times more probable.  All the events described were completely avoidable by having boots on the ground.
    Let us be more specific.  The body language of a combatant is obvious if you are close enough.  The body language of a person at a wedding is completely different.  That it cannot be determined from the air is surely well proven.
    Air power is not in the business of been light infantry but are supposed to be in the business of providing close support under the direction of such.  Training protocols should have that spelled out.
    Instead we get a video of a couple of sky jockeys with obviously itchy trigger fingers opening up on a mob of folks.  No military doctrine that I am aware of would have a gaggle of enemy combatants clump together unless it was at a whore house.  They would immediately space themselves out.  In fact that would be a strong indication of enemies.
    We have the plentiful air power.  Is close support with ground units as SOP really too difficult?  Or are these guys so bored that wishful thinking takes over?
    Gods and Monsters 
    Fighting American Wars From On High 
    The Greeks had it right.  When you live on Mount Olympus, your view of humanity is qualitatively different.  The Greek gods, after all, lied to, stole from, lusted for, and punished humanity without mercy, while taking the planet for a spin in a manner that we mortals would consider amoral, if not immoral.  And it didn’t bother them a bit.  They felt — so Greek mythology tells us — remarkably free to intervene from the heights in the affairs of whichever mortals caught their attention and, in the process, to do whatever took their fancy without thinking much about the nature of human lives.  If they sometimes felt sympathy for the mortals whose lives they repeatedly threw into havoc, they were incapable of real empathy.  Such is the nature of the world when your view is the Olympian one and what you see from the heights are so many barely distinguishable mammals scurrying below.  The details of their petty lives naturally blur and seem less than important.
    In the last week, we’ve seen — literally viewed — a modern example of what it means in our day to act from the heights, and we’ve read about another striking example of the same.  The website WikiLeaks released a decrypted July 2007 video of two U.S. Apache helicopters attacking Iraqis on a street in Baghdad.  At least 12 Iraqis, including two employees of the news agency Reuters, a photographer and his driver, were killed in the incident, and two children in the vehicle of a good Samaritan who stopped to pick up casualties and died in the process, were also wounded.
    Without a doubt, that video is a remarkable 17-minute demo of how to efficiently slaughter tiny beings milling about below.  There is no way American helicopter crews could know just who was walking down there — Sunni or Shiite, insurgent or shopper, Baghdadis with intent to harm Americans or Baghdadis paying little attention to two of the helicopters then so regularly buzzing the city.  Were they killers, guards, bank clerks, unemployed idlers, Baathist Party members, religious fanatics, café owners?  Who could tell from such a height?  But the details mattered little.
    The Reuters cameraman crouches behind a building looking, camera first, around a corner, and you hear an American in an Apache yell, “He’s got an RPG!” — mistaking his camera with its long-range lens for a rocket-propelled grenade launcher.  The pilot, of course, doesn’t know that it’s a Reuters photographer down there.  Only we do.  (And when his death did become known, the military carefully buried the video.)
    Along with that video comes a soundtrack in which you hear the Americans check out the rules of engagement (ROE), request permission to fire, and banter about the results.  (“Hahaha. I hit ’em”; “Oh yeah, look at those dead bastards…”; and of the two wounded children, “Well, it’s their fault bringing their kids into a battle.”)  Such callous chit-chat is explained away in media articles here by the need for “psychological distance” of those whose job it is to kill, but in truth that’s undoubtedly the way you talk when you, and only you, have god-like access to the skies and can hover over the rest of humanity, making preparations to wipe out lesser beings.
    Similarly, in pre-dawn darkness on February 12th in Paktia Province, eastern Afghanistan, a U.S. Special Operations team dropped from the skies into a village near Gardez.  There, in a world that couldn’t be more distant from their lives, possibly using an informant’s bad tip, American snipers on rooftops killed an Afghan police officer (“head of intelligence in one of Paktia’s most volatile districts”), his brother, and three women — a pregnant mother of 10, a pregnant mother of six, and a teenager.  They then evidently dug the bullets out of the women’s bodies, bound and gagged their bodies, and filed a report claiming that the dead men were Taliban militants who had murdered the women — “honor killings” — before they arrived. (This was how the American press, generally reliant on military handouts, initially reported the story.)
    Recently, in the face of some good on-the-spot journalism by an unembedded British reporter, this cover-up story ingloriously disintegrated, while U.S. military spokespeople retreated step by step in a series of partial admissions of error, leading to an in-person apology, including the sacrifice of a sheep and $30,000 in compensation payments.
    Ceremonial Evisceration
    Both incidents elicited shock and anger from critics of American war policies.  And both incidentsare shocking.  Probably the most shocking aspect of them, however, is just how humdrum they actually are, even if the public release of video of such events isn’t.  Start with one detail in those Afghan murders, reported in most accounts but little emphasized: what the Americans descended on was a traditional family ceremony.  More than 25 guests had gathered for the naming of a newborn child. 
    In fact, over these last nine-plus years, Afghan (and Iraqi) ceremonies of all sorts have regularly been blasted away.  Keeping a partial tally of wedding parties eradicated by American air power at TomDispatch.com, I had counted five such “incidents” between December 2001 and July 2008.  (A sixth in July 2002 in which possibly 40 Afghan wedding celebrants died and many more were wounded has since come to my attention, as has a seventh in August 2008.)  Nor have other kinds of rites where significant numbers of Afghans gather been immune from attack, including funerals, and now, naming ceremonies.  And keep in mind that these are only the reported incidents in a rural land where much undoubtedly goes unreported.
    Similarly, General Stanley McChrystal, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, recently expressed surprise at a tally since last summer of at least 30 Afghans killed and 80 wounded at checkpoints when U.S. soldiers opened fire on cars.  He said: “We have shot an amazing number of people, but to my knowledge, none has ever proven to be a threat.”  Or consider 36-year-old Mohammed Yonus, a popular imam of a mosque on the outskirts of Kabul, who was killed in his car this January by fire from a passing NATO convoy, which considered his vehicle “threatening.”  His seven-year-old son was in the back seat.
    Or while on the subject of Reuters employees, recall reporter Mazen Tomeizi, a Palestinian producer for the al-Arabiya satellite network of Dubai, who was killed on Haifa Street in central Baghdad in September 2004 by a U.S. helicopter attack.  He was on camera at the time and his blood spattered the lens.  Seif Fouad, a Reuters cameraman, was wounded in the same incident, while a number of bystanders, including a girl, were killed.  Or remember the 17 Iraqi civilians infamously murderedwhen Blackwater employees in a convoy began firing in Nissour Square in Baghdad on September 16, 2007.  Or the missiles regularly shot from U.S. helicopters and unmanned aerial drones into the heavily populated Shiite slum of Sadr City back in 2007-08.  Or the Iraqis regularly killed at checkpoints in the years since the invasion of 2003.  Or, for that matter, the first moments of that invasion on March 20, 2003, when, according toHuman Rights Watch, “dozens” of ordinary Iraqi civilians were killed by the 50 aerial “decapitation strikes” the Bush administration launched against Saddam Hussein and the rest of the Iraqi leadership, missing every one of them.
    This is the indiscriminate nature of killing, no matter how “precise” and “surgical” the weaponry, when war is made by those who command the heavens and descend, as if from Mars, into alien worlds, convinced that they have the power to sort out the good from the bad, even if they can’t tellvillagers from insurgents.  Under these circumstances, death comes in a multitude of disguises — from a great distance via cruise missiles or Predator drones and close in at checkpoints where up-armored American troops, fingers on triggers, have no way of telling a suicide car bomber from a confused or panicked local with a couple of kids in the backseat.  It comes repetitively when U.S. Special Operations forces helicopter into villages after dark looking for terror suspects based on tips from unreliable informants who may be settling local scores of which the Americans are dismally ignorant. It comes repeatedly to Afghan police or Army troops mistaken for the enemy.
    It came not just to a police officer and his brother and family in Paktia Province, but to a “wealthy businessman with construction and security contracts with the nearby American base at Shindand airport” who, along with up to 76 members of his extended family, was slaughtered in such a raid on the village of Azizabad in Herat Province in August 2008.  It came to the family of Awal Khan, an Afghan army artillery commander (away in another province) whose “schoolteacher wife, a 17-year-old daughter named Nadia, a 15-year-old son, Aimal, and his brother, employed by a government department” were killed in April 2009 in a U.S.-led raid in Khost Province in Eastern Afghanistan.  (Another daughter was wounded and the pregnant wife of Khan’s cousin was shot five times in the abdomen.)  It came to 12 Afghans by a roadside near the city of Jalalabad in April 2007 when Marine Special Operations forces, attacked by a suicide bomber, let loose along a ten-mile stretch of road.  Victims included a four-year-old girl, a one-year-old boy, and three elderly villagers.  According to a report by Carlotta Gall of the New York Times, a “16-year-old newly married girl was cut down while she was carrying a bundle of grass to her family’s farmhouse… A 75-year-old man walking to his shop was hit by so many bullets that his son did not recognize the body when he came to the scene.”
    It came in November 2009 to two relatives of Majidullah Qarar, the spokesman for the Minister of Agriculture, who were shot down in cold blood in Ghazni City in another Special Operations night raid.  It came in Uruzgan Province in February 2010 when U.S. Special Forces troops in helicopters struck a convoy of mini-buses, killing up to 27 civilians, including women and children.
    And it came this April 5th in an airstrike in Helmand province in southern Afghanistan in which a residence was hit and four civilians — two women, an elderly man, and a child — were killed along with four men, immediately identified in a NATO press release as “suspected insurgents.” (“Insurgents were using the compound as a firing position when combined forces, unaware of the possible presence of civilians, directed air assets against it.”) The usual joint investigation with Afghans has been launched and if those four men later morph into “civilians,” the usual apologies will ensue.  (Of course, “suspected insurgents,” too, can have wives, children, and elderly parents or relatives, or simply take over compounds with such inhabitants.)  And it came this Monday morningon the outskirts of Kandahar City, when U.S. troops opened fire on a bus, killing five civilians (including a woman), wounding more, and sparking angry protests.
    Planetary Predators 
    Whether in the skies or patrolling on the ground, Americans know next to nothing of the worlds they are passing above or through.  This is, of course, even more true of the “pilots” who fly our latest wonder weapons, the Predators, Reapers, and other unmanned drones over American battle zones, while sitting at consoles somewhere in the United States.  They are clearly engaged in the most literal of video-game wars, while living the most prosaic of god-like lives.  A sign at Creech Air Force Base in Nevada warns such a drone pilot to “drive carefully” on leaving the base after a work shift “in” Afghanistan or Iraq.  This, it says, is “the most dangerous part of your day.”
    One instructor of drone pilots has described this form of warfare vividly: “Flying a Predator is like a chess game… Because you have a God’s-eye perspective, you need to think a few moves ahead.”  However much you may “think ahead,” though, the tiny, barely distinguishable creatures you’re deciding whether to eradicate certainly don’t inhabit the same universe as you, with your looming needs, troubles, and concerns.
    Here’s the fact of the matter: in the cities, towns, and villages of the distant lands where Americans tend to make war, civilians die regularly and repeatedly at our hands.  Each death may contain its own uniquely nightmarish details, but the overall story remains remarkably repetitious.  Such “incidents” are completely predictable. Even General McChrystal, determined to “protect the population” in Afghanistan as part of his counterinsurgency war, has proven remarkably incapable of changing the nature of our style of warfare.  Curtail air strikes, rein in Special Operations night attacks — none of it will, in the long run, matter.  Put in a nutshell: If you arrive from the heavens, they will die.
    Having watched the video of the death of the 22-year-old Reuters photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen in that July 2007 video, his father said: “At last the truth has been revealed, and I’m satisfied God revealed the truth… If such an incident took place in America, even if an animal were killed like this, what would they do?”
    Putting aside the controversy during the 2008 presidential campaign over the hunting of wolves from helicopters in Alaska, Noor-Eldeen may not have gone far enough.  For that helicopter crew, his son was indeed the wartime equivalent of a hunted animal.  An article on the front page of the New York Times recently captured this perspective, however inadvertently, when, speaking of the CIA’s aerial war over Pakistan’s tribal borderlands, it described the Agency’s unmanned drones as “observing and tracking targets, then unleashing missiles on their quarry.”
    “Quarry” has quite a straightforward definition: “a hunted animal; prey.”  Indeed, the al-Qaeda leaders, Taliban militants, and local civilians in the region are all “prey” which, of course, makes usthe predators. That the majority of drones cruising those skies 24/7 and repeatedly launching their Hellfire missiles are named “Predators” should, then, come as no surprise.
    Americans are unused to being the prey in war and so essentially incapable of imagining what that actually means, day in, day out, year after year.  We prefer to think of their deaths as so many accidents or mistakes — “collateral damage” — when they are the norm, not the exception, not what’s collateral in such wars.  We prefer to imagine ourselves bringing the best (of values and intentions) to a backward, ignorant world and so invariably make ourselves sound far kindlier than we are.  Like the gods of Olympus, we have a tendency to flatter ourselves, even as we continually remake the “rules of engagement,” those ROEs, to suit our changing tastes and needs, while creating a language of war that suits our tender sensibilities about ourselves.
    In this way, for instance, assassination-by-drone has become an ever more central part of the Obama administration’s foreign and war policy, and yet the word “assassination” — with all its negative implications, legal and otherwise — has been displaced by the far more anodyne, more bureaucratic “targeted killing.” In a sense, in fact, what “enhanced interrogation techniques” (aka torture) were to the Bush administration, “targeted killing” is to the Obama administration.
    For the gods, anything is possible.  In the language of Olympian war, for instance, even sitting at a console thousands of miles from the not-quite-humans you are preparing to obliterate can become an act worthy of Homeric praise.  As Greg Jaffe of the Washington Post reported, Colonel Eric Mathewson, the Air Force officer with the most experience with unmanned aircraft, has a new notion of “valor,” a word “which is a part of almost every combat award citation.”  “Valor to me is not risking your life,” he says. “Valor is doing what is right. Valor is about your motivations and the ends that you seek. It is doing what is right for the right reasons.” What the gods do is, by definition, glorious.
    Descending From On High
    And it’s not only the American way of war, but the American way of statecraft that arrives as if from the heavens, ready to impose its own definitions of the good and necessary on the world.  American officials, civilian and military, constantly fly into the embattled (and let’s be blunt: Muslim) regions of the planet to make demands, order, chide, plead, wheedle, cajole, intimidate, threaten, twist arms, and bluster to get our “allies” to do what we most want.
    Our special plenipotentiaries like Richard Holbrooke do this regularly; our secretary of state follows.  Our Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Centcom commander, and Secretary of Defensedescend from the clouds on Islamabad, Kabul, or Baghdad frequently.  Our Vice President careensIraq-wards to help mediate disputes, and even our President, the “heaviest political artillery” (as one analyst called him), recently dropped in for a six-hour visit to “Afghanistan” (actually the hanger of a large American air base and the presidential palace in Kabul).  While there — as Americans papers reported quite proudly — he chided and “pressed” Afghan President Hamid Karzai, offered “pointed criticism” on corruption, and delivered “a tough message.” He then returned to the U.S., only to find, to the surprise and frustration of his top officials, that Karzai — almost immediately accused of being unstable, possibly on drugs, and prone to child-like tantrums — responded bylashing out at his American minders.
    We are, of course, the rational ones, the grown-ups, the good governance team, the incorruptiblecrew who bring enlightenment and democracy to the world, even if, as practical gods, in support of our Afghan war we’re perfectly willing to shore up a corrupt autocrat elsewhere who is willing to lend us an air base (for $60 million a year in rent) to haul in troops and supplies — until he falls.
    All of this is par for the course for the Olympians from North America.  It all seems normal, even benign, except in the rare moments when videos of slaughter begin to circulate.  Looked at from the ground up, however, we undoubtedly seem as petulant as the gods or demiurges of some malign religion, or as the aliens and predators of some horrific sci-fi film — heartless and cold, unfeeling and murderous.  As Safa Chmagh, the brother of one of the Reuters employees who died in the 2007 Apache attack, reportedly said: “The pilot is not human, he’s a monster. What did my brother do? What did his children do? Does the pilot accept his kids to be orphans?”
    As with tales humans tell of the gods, there’s a moral here: If you want it to be otherwise, don’t descend on strange lands armed to the teeth, prepared to occupy, and ready to kill. 
    Tom Engelhardt, co-founder of the American Empire Project, runs the Nation Institute’s TomDispatch.com. He is the author of The End of Victory Culture, a history of the Cold War and beyond, as well as of a novel, The Last Days of Publishing. His latest book, The American Way of War (Haymarket Books), will be published in May.
    [A small bow of thanks and appreciation to TomDispatch regular William Astore, who helped inspire this piece.]
    Copyright 2010 Tom Engelhardt