Author: Pan-African News Wire

  • Nigerian Women in Abuja Protest Mass Killings in Jos

    Nigeria women protest at killings

    Hundreds of women have taken to the streets of Nigeria’s capital, Abuja, and the central city of Jos in rallies against Sunday’s massacre near Jos.

    The women, mostly dressed in black, demanded that the government protect women and children better.

    At least 109 people were killed in the ethnic clashes near Jos. Many were said to be women and children.

    Survivors have told the BBC how they saw relatives and friends hacked down with machetes and their bodies burnt.

    Witnesses and officials say the perpetrators came from the mainly Muslim Fulani group. Most of the victims were Christians from the Berom group.

    The attacks appear to be retaliation for violence in the villages around Jos in January, when most of the victims were said to be Muslim.

    The women in Jos carried placards proclaiming: “Stop killing our future; Bloodshed in the Plateau [State] must stop.”

    They marched carrying Bibles, wooden crosses or branches of mango trees, chanting: “No more soldiers.”

    Mass grave

    Christian pastor Esther Ebanga told the crowds of women: “Enough is enough.”

    “All we are asking is that our children and women should not be killed any more. We demand justice,” the AFP news agency quoted her as saying.
    —————————————————————————————–
    JOS, PLATEAU STATE
    Deadly riots in 2001, 2008 and 2010
    City divided into Christian and Muslim areas
    Divisions accentuated by system of classifying people as indigenes and settlers
    Hausa-speaking Muslims living in Jos for decades are still classified as settlers
    Settlers find it difficult to stand for election
    Communities divided along party lines: Christians mostly back the ruling PDP; Muslims generally supporting the opposition ANPP
    —————————————————————————————-
    Meanwhile in Abuja, women staged a similar rally, carrying pictures of the dead.

    Risika Razak, one of the leaders of the protest, said she wanted to show the government that “things are not going right”.

    “They should beef up security in troubled areas so that we would be able to know that people that go to bed will wake up the next day and life will continue,” she said.

    Officials and religious leaders have accused the military of not acting quickly enough to prevent the massacre.

    But on Thursday, the commander of the regional task force, Major General Salih Maina, rebuffed the criticism.

    He said the army was told of the violence only after it had happened.

    Earlier, the BBC’s Komla Dumor visited a mass grave in the village of Dogo-Nahawa where more than 100 bodies from one village had been buried.

    One community leader in the village told the BBC how his five-year-old granddaughter had been hacked to death with a machete.

    Like earlier eyewitness accounts, he said the violence started with gunfire.

    “People were running helter-skelter because of this…. They had never heard something like this before.

    “People that were running and run into them, and they were macheted.”

    The authorities have arrested about 200 people and charged 49 with murder.

    Although the clashes take place between Muslims and Christians, observers say the underlying causes are economic and political.

    Story from BBC NEWS:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/8562961.stm
    Published: 2010/03/11 18:53:47 GMT

  • Equal Rights, Equal Opportunities: Progress For All in South Africa

    Report back | by Noluthando Mayende-Sibiya

    Equal rights, equal opportunities: Progress for all

    Courtesy of ANC Today

    Report back by Noluthando Mayende-SibiyaOn Monday March 08, South Africa joins the rest of the world in observing International Women’s Day under the theme: Equal rights, equal opportunities: Progress for all.

    In addition to the activities organized to mark this day in South Africa, our country has sent a high-level delegation of women Ministers, Deputy Ministers, Members of the Executive Councils, Members of Parliament and Chapter 09 institutions to 54th Session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (UNCSW) taking place in New York from 01-12 March.

    We sent this delegation with full support of Cabinet because the year 2010 is a major milestone in the global struggle for gender equality and improving the status of women. This year marks the 30th anniversary of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), 15 years since the historical adoption of the Beijing Declaration and its Platform for Action and 10 years since the adoption of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

    At UNCSW, South Africa is participating in the review of the implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action which provides an opportunity for countries to share experiences and best practices in improving the political and socio-economic status of women. The meeting is also discussing the measures for shaping a gender perspective towards the full realisation of the MDGs and its linkage with Beijing Platform for Action.

    We are engaging on issues of women economic empowerment in the context of the global economic and financial crises and the challenges of violence affecting women worldwide. Of particular concern is the omission of the challenge of human trafficking, as it was not perceived as a major problem during the adoption of the Beijing Declaration in 1995. Globalisation and other factors have brought this challenge to the fore and there is a need for a comprehensive global response.

    Our delegation to UNCSW is sharing South Africa’s best practices and learning from the innovations of other member-states. Our stories of progress include significant legislative reforms that facilitate gender equality and improved representation of women in political decision-making position, with our country having the third highest number of women in the legislature (45%) worldwide. We are also candid about the challenges of poverty particularly in rural areas, gender based violence, HIV/AIDS and other social challenges affecting women of our country. This rich collection of experiences will enable us to bring home new strategies that will enrich the implementation South Africa’s own programme of action.

    Following the President announcement of the establishment of the Ministry for Women, Children and Persons with Disabilities in May 2009, we focused on building systems and processes that will enable this entity to successfully actualise the vision embodied in the announcement and the relevant Polokwane resolution. Our role is to drive, accelerate and oversee the government’s equity, equality and empowerment agenda for women, children and persons with disabilities.

    We have largely completed this process and are ready to ensure that 2010 does indeed become the Year of Action for marginalised women, children and persons with disabilities. As indicated in the State of the Nation Address, this year the department will, as part of its oversight function, undertake a rigorous process of integrating equity measures into Government’s Programme of Action.

    This action will ensure that government’s delivery process integrates gender, disability and children’s rights consideration thereby ascertaining that women, children and persons with disabilities can access developmental opportunities. This step further sharpens government’s result orientated approach focusing on the five priorities.

    Our interventions will ensure that government’s effort to measure and monitor service delivery includes clear indicators relating to the three marginalized groups of our society. In addition to our oversight role, the Department has identified key flagship programmes for this term of government. Some of these projects are: Rural Development for the economic empowerment for women and persons with disabilities, establishment of the Women’s Empowerment Fund, and action to guarantee that government attains 50/50 gender parity.

    In line with government focus on combating crime, we will also intensify Campaigns on 365 and 16 Days of Activism on No Violence against Women and Children. The Secretariat responsible for the implementation of these campaigns is already being transferred from the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs to the Department for Women, Children and Persons with Disabilities.

    It is within this area that we are engaging with issues such as ritual killings as one of priority contact crimes (i.e. assault, rape and murder) affecting women and children. Furthermore with regard to children, our department is focusing on comprehensive protection of the rights of children living in the streets as well a programme for South Africans to support a child from the less privileged communities particularly those in rural areas. Concurrently, we will work to strengthen a culture of age appropriate responsibilities amongst our children.

    For the disability sector, we are developing a Plan of Action for the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The department is also developing a strategy that should move the country towards achieving 2% employment of persons with disabilities. This strategy will include the development of tools that will assist government to increase recruitment of persons with disabilities. We will also be encouraging the private sector to match government’s effort in the attainment of 2% employment target for persons with disabilities and 50/50 gender parity. We will be elaborating on the programme of the department during our Budget Vote debate in parliament scheduled for April 16.

    The implementation of our programme requires mobilisation of adequate human and other resources. Our organogram with the staff complement of 194 has been approved by the Department of Public Service and Administration. We are finalising the selection for the position of the Director General this month.

    In the meantime, I have directed the department to advertise most of the post that we are scheduled to fill in the 2010/11 financial year. These include among others Deputy Directors General responsible for each of three branches – Women, Children and Persons with Disabilities. This will enable the new Director General to urgently select staff needed carry out our task.

    As we observe the International Women’s Day, we reassure the women of South Africa that 2010 is indeed a Year of Action in their struggle for Equal rights, equal opportunities: Progress for all.

    Noluthando Mayende-Sibiya is an ANC NEC member and Minister for Women, Children and Persons with Disabilities

  • Zimbabwe News Update: Government Hails Farmers’ Unions; No Observer Force For Elections

    Goverment hails farmers’ unions

    Bindura Bureau
    Zimbabwe Herald

    Vice President Joice Mujuru says the Government is cognisant of the role of farmers’ unions as advisors on policy issues and vehicles of effective implementation of policies and programmes.

    In a speech read on her behalf at a field day on conservation agriculture in Guruve on Wednesday, VP Mujuru said, “Farmers’ unions are important in that they lobby on behalf of their members and provide solutions to issues affecting their members in an organised way.”

    The Government, she said, acknowledged challenges which farmers were facing.

    “Central to these challenges is lack of funding, inadequate supply of production inputs and limited farming infrastructure. Despite all these challenges, Government will always endeavour to support farmers through such schemes as mechanisation and input support schemes,” she said.

    VP Mujuru said Government was committed to implementing Sadc’s Maputo Declaration and set aside 10 percent of the annual budget to agriculture.

    “Government recognises the principle of agriculture-led growth as a main strategy to achieve the Millennium Development Goal of poverty reduction, pursuit of a six percent average annual agricultural sector growth rate at the national level, and exploitation of regional complementarities and co-operation to boost growth.

    “As Government, we will do all that we can to support union-initiated projects that enhance food production and therefore, work towards achieving the breadbasket status.”

    She said agriculture contributed over 40 percent of national exports, 60 percent of raw materials for manufacturing and provided livelihoods to over 70 percent of the population.

    Zanu-PF members urged to participate in constitution outreach programmes

    Herald Reporter

    Zanu-PF members should participate in the forthcoming constitutional outreach programmes to ensure the party’s views and aspirations are captured in the proposed law.

    This was said by the party’s secretary for finance, Cde David Karimanzira, at a Harare inter-district meeting at Zanu-PF Headquarters yesterday.

    “The constitution is for us all and is about safeguarding the country’s wealth and heritage.

    “We should all participate so that our views are captured. Don’t it leave to others to talk on your behalf,” he said.

    He urged mobilisation of support ahead of probable elections next year.

    “We should start mobilising supporters now because elections could be held next year as announced by the President.

    “We don’t want a repeat of what happened in 2008,” he said.

    Zanu-PF chairman for Harare Province Cde Amos Midzi called for unity in the party. “There is only one Zanu-PF and so we should all be united. We should be united and respect party structures. No one should claim to own the party; it is for us all,” said Cde Midzi.

    He said divisions seen during provincial elections last year had been resolved following meetings convened by political commissar Cde Webster Shamu.

    Cdes Midzi and Hubert Nyanhongo were involved in a highly contentious poll.

    “We had a meeting with the political commissar, his deputy, myself and Cde Nyanhongo and we agreed that we are one party. We agreed that Cde Nyanhongo will work as a Central Committee member while I will do my work as the provincial chairman,” said Cde Midzi.

    Meanwhile, the party has embarked on a programme to computerise its membership database.

    Zanu-PF deputy secretary for science and technology Cde Patrick Zhuwao is leading the process.

    PM wrong on elections: US

    By Hebert Zharare
    Zimbabwe Herald

    NO peacekeeping forces will be deployed in Zimbabwe to monitor elections and MDC-T leader Mr Morgan Tsvangirai was wrong in suggesting such action as the Africa Union and Sadc will not sanction such a move, an American military expert has said.

    Addressing journalists at the United States Embassy’s Public Affairs premises in Harare yesterday, the expert — a colonel in the American army — said a peacekeeping force had never been deployed to monitor elections in Southern Africa and Zimbabwe would not break that trend.

    Mr Tsvangirai, who is Prime Minister in the inclusive Government, at the weekend told his supporters in Chitungwiza that a Sadc and/or African Union peacekeeping force should regulate Zimbabwe’s next elections.

    “The Prime Minister was wrong in suggesting the deployment of a peacekeeping force in Zimbabwe to monitor elections. I think he used wrong terminology,” said the official who cannot be named for diplomatic reasons.

    “Sadc will not agree on the deployment of such forces here. There has to be consensus . . . there are rules of engagement.

    “Inasfar as I understand Sadc, there will be no such agreement. The presidents in Sadc would not like this precedence to happen in the region,” he said.

    The colonel added that in suggesting the deployment of peacekeeping forces, Mr Tsvangirai had not put into perspective the complexity of such operations.

    Such forces, he explained, were deployed in countries at war after the warring parties have peace talks that culminate in cessation of major hostilities.

    He said: “The peacekeepers are then deployed in between them (the warring forces) to act as a buffer zone. They do not give instructions, they just report on what is happening.”

    He gave examples of armed conflicts between Ethiopia and Eritrea, and in Sudan’s Darfur region among other hotspots where deployment of the peacekeeping forces was necessary.

    He said it would be difficult to deploy such peacekeeping forces in Zimbabwe.

    “If you try to deploy the peacekeeping force, it will not be successful. The rules of engagement do not allow them to fight the two forces.

    “They are not there to shoot, they are there to report. So the practicality will be difficult for elections,” he said.

    Commenting on Zimbabwe’s military, the expert said the Zimbabwe Defence Forces continued to grow professionally.

    In the past, MDC-T’s allies have called for military intervention in Zimbabwe.

    PM defends indigenisation laws

    By Tendai Mugabe

    Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai has defended the indigenisation laws and regulations saying they promote Zimbabwean interests and must not scare away foreign investors.

    At a symposium on public-private partnerships yesterday, PM Tsvangirai said the policies would result in greater Zimbabwean participation in the economy.

    “I want to assure you that there is no intention on the part of the Government to undermine investment, but to promote broad-based indigenisation and empowerment.

    “Sometimes investors get alarmed when a policy is announced without clarification, but I want to assure you that the policy is in the best interests of the people of Zimbabwe.

    “The policy intends to enhance local participation and, of course, not the enrichment of a few people,” he said.

    Key statutory regulations of the Indigenisation and Economic Empowerment Act were gazetted last month and became operational on March 1.

    From this date up until May companies worth over US$500 000 should furnish Government with detailed plans on how they will conform with the legal requirement that Zimbabweans own 51 percent of the shareholding.

    After that they have five years within which to implement those plans.

    There have been attempts in some quarters to demonise the empowerment agenda and several MDC-T figures have come out castigating the law that seeks to ensure Zimbabweans control their own economy.

    PM Tsvangirai, however, said Government was discussing how best to implement the law.

    “We are negotiating, discussing and not with the intention of getting rid of the Indigenisation Act, but how we can create an environment that allows local participation.”

    He said the idea was not to criminalise foreign investment.

    PM Tsvangirai decried the recent civil servants’ strike saying they must understand that Government had no money.

    “We can’t squeeze blood out of a stone and at this stage of the inclusive Government we have started on polarisation and this is not healthy,” he said.

    PM Tsvangirai said Zimbabwe should invest more in higher education to boost the economy adding private sector participation was crucial.

    “Government is not abandoning its mandate of supporting the higher education sector by seeking partnership with the private sector but we are just sharing the responsibility.

    “Zimbabwe must continue to invest in human capital. It is that human capital that helps much to develop our economy but the world over it proved that governments could not achieve this alone,” he said.

    The PM bemoaned the deterioration in standards at State universities. He said Government was supportive of the implementation of public-private partnerships that were properly instituted.

    Tertiary and Higher Education Minister Stan Mudenge said the private sector was the largest consumer of university graduates and it should assist in nurturing students.

    He said Government would host an Intellectual Expo where they would ask institutions of higher learning to showcase what they are doing.

    Minister Mudenge said this would also help the public understand how State institutions were using their money.

    Typhoid cases rise to 45

    Herald Reporters

    Confirmed typhoid cases in Mabvuku have risen to 45 amid unconfirmed reports of another death from the disease in the same suburb.

    Last week Harare City Council officials said five people died while 35 others had been treated for typhoid.

    However, yesterday city health services director Dr Stanley Mungofa dismissed reports of the deaths.

    Regardless, Mabvuku residents said a man from Mhonda Street died after displaying typhoid symptoms yesterday morning.

    Dr Mungofa said they were offering free treatment. “Nobody will be denied treatment at the council clinics.

    “The number of confirmed cases has risen to 45 and we suspect there could be more as many are still being reported in the community.

    “We have started campaigns to raise awareness of the disease among residents in the suburb,” he said.

    Dr Mungofa said council, Government, the World Health Organisation and Unicef were monitoring the situation.

    He appealed to the public to exercise strict hygiene practices and avoid drinking water from unsafe sources.

    Nyamaturi Street residents in Mabvuku yesterday said many people had been treated for the disease while others in the area said the outbreak could be linked to an unprotected well there.

    Mrs Loice Chimbwanda said: “We only got water two weeks ago after the first cases were reported but we had gone for close to six months without water.

    “There was also no refuse collection during that period. We are disheartened that council acts only when there are disease outbreaks before attending to service delivery.”

    Typhoid fever is transmitted by ingestion of food or water contaminated with an infected person’s waste.

    Symptoms usually develop one to three weeks after exposure.

    It is characterised by slowly progressing fever reaching about 40 degrees Celsius, profuse sweating and non-bloody diarrhoea.

    Untreated typhoid fever manifests itself through headaches, coughing, nose bleeds and abdominal pains.

  • Greece Hit By Nationwide Strike

    Thursday, March 11, 2010
    20:01 Mecca time, 17:01 GMT

    Greece hit by nationwide strike

    Street clashes took place on the sidelines of the mainly peaceful demonstration

    More than 30,000 people have demonstrated in Athens during a nationwide strike in Greece against the cash-strapped government’s austerity measures.

    Thursday’s walkout by public and private sector workers, the second nationwide action to have taken place in the past two weeks, grounded flights, shut schools and halted public transport.

    Street clashes took place on the sidelines of the mainly peaceful demonstration, with hundreds of masked and hooded youths punching and kicking motorcycle police.

    Riot police used volleys of tear gas and stun grenades to disperse the youths.

    Earlier, rioters used sledge hammers to smash the glass fronts of more than a dozen shops, banks and a cinema in the capital.

    Police said at least nine suspected rioters were detained, while two officers were injured.

    ‘No more sacrifices’

    Thursday’s strike shut down all public services and schools, leaving ferries tied up at port and suspending all news broadcasts for the day.

    State hospitals were left with emergency staff as workers walked off the job for 24 hours to protest against spending cuts and tax hikes planned by George Papandreou, the Greek prime minister.

    The GSEE and Adedy, its public-sector sister union, have said that the measures will hurt the poor and worsen the economy.

    About half of the nation’s five million workers are represented by the unions for the 24-hour strike.

    Strikers and protesters banged drums and chanted slogans such as “no sacrifice for plutocracy,” and “real jobs, higher pay”.

    People draped banners from apartment buildings reading: “No more sacrifices, war against war.”

    Some private bank branches were open despite calls from the bank employees’ union to participate in the strike.

    Barnaby Phillips, Al Jazeera’s correspondent in Athens, said: He [Papandreou] is in a very tight spot, but there is perhaps a feeling … that support for him is beginning to ebb, perhaps inevitably, as people begin to understand the details of this austerity programme and how it’s going to hit them in their pockets.

    “The latest opinion polls show most people are against many of the measures he is proposing and the main opposition party, New Democracy, has broken ranks with the centre-left party that is in power and is speaking against many of the policies.

    “When you go out on the streets into the demonstrations people will tell you it’s simply not fair that they are being targeted, they are going to have to pay for a mess which they did not create.”

    Police protest

    While their colleagues clashed with groups of protesters, some police joined the demonstration.

    About 200 uniformed police, coast guard and fire brigade officers, who cannot go on strike but can hold protests, gathered at a square in the centre of Athens shortly before the marches got under way.

    “The police and other security forces have been particularly hard hit by the new measures because our salaries are very low,” said Yiannis Fanariotis, general secretary of one police association.

    He said the average police officer made about $1,360 to $1,635 a month if weekend and night shifts were included.

    Fanariotis said joining the protest “doesn’t feel strange, because we are working people like everybody else and we are all shouting out for our rights”.

    Shopkeepers along the demonstration route scrambled to roll down their shutters for fear of violence, while a few blocks away, people sat at outdoor restaurants, nonchalantly continuing their meals.

    Minor clashes also broke out in the northern city of Thessaloniki, where about 14,000 people marched through the centre.

    Euro pressured

    The government says the tough cuts are the only way to dig Greece out of a crisis that has hammered the common European currency and inflated the loan-dependent country’s borrowing costs.

    But unions say ordinary Greeks are being called to pay a disproportionate price for past fiscal mismanagement.

    “They are trying to make workers pay the price for this crisis,” said Yiannis Panagopoulos, the leader of the GSEE, Greece’s largest union.

    “These measures will not be effective and will throw the economy into deep freeze.”

    Fears of a Greek default have undermined the euro for all 16 countries that share the currency, putting the Greek government under intense European Union pressure to quickly show fiscal improvement.

    It has announced an additional $6.5bn in savings through public sector salary cuts, pension freezes and consumer tax hikes to deal with its ballooning deficit.

    The latest cutbacks, added to a previous $15.24bn of austerity measures, seek to reduce the country’s budget deficit from 12.7 per cent of annual output to 8.7 per cent this year.

    The long-term target is to bring overspending below the EU ceiling of 3 per cent of GDP in 2012.

    Source: Agencies

  • Claudia Jones: A Legacy Deferred–Excerpts From a Talk Delivered by Andrea Egypt

    Claudia Jones — a legacy deferred

    Published Mar 10, 2010 5:58 PM

    Excerpts from a speech by Andrea Egypt at a Workers World Party Black History Month forum in Detroit

    Sometimes a legacy can be buried within the rubble of politics for a long time, waiting to be unearthed and refined like a diamond in the rough.

    Such is the legacy of Claudia Jones. She was persecuted by the McCarthyite anti-communist witch hunt and by the McCarran-Walter and Smith Acts against immigrants.

    Claudia Jones was a triple threat: She was Black, a woman and a communist, at a time when this country was undergoing social and political upheaval.

    She was powerful in both theory and practice, with a radical, revolutionary approach that challenged national and women’s oppression. She launched transnational challenges to U.S. foreign policy from the perspective of Marxist and Leninist theory.

    She had the ability to address a wide range of issues and was widely known as the Communist Party’s principal theorist on the “woman question.” She wrote reviews, theses and essays on Pan Africanism, Black nationalism, Afro-Asian Caribbeanism and immigration rights as well as the West Indian diaspora of struggle, using her journalistic skills to integrate issues of race, class and gender on local and international levels.

    She was noted for the party’s theory of the “triple oppression” of Black women. She wrote that “if the party wanted to be a place of equality, then it means above all fighting for the economic equality of women, because her economic dependence on men in our society, and her exclusion from production makes for a double exploitation of women and triply so for Negro women in present-day society.”

    Jones was born in 1916 in Port-au-Spain, Trinidad, then a British colony. Her family lived well until the cocoa industry crashed and her father lost his job. The family was forced to emigrate. She was 8 years old when they moved to Harlem, where they lived in squalid, impoverished conditions.

    Shortly after they assimilated, her mother died due to spinal meningitis and overwork in the garment factories. Her father could find only custodial work to support the family. They were so poor that Claudia missed receiving an important Citizenship Award at her high school because she had no clothes to wear for the ceremony.

    Due to poor conditions, at the age of 17 she contracted tuberculosis and was committed to a sanitarium for a year. She suffered severe lung damage that affected her health throughout her life.

    Her health, her living environment, the death of her mother, her father’s employment situation, her inability to find work except in laundries and factories, as well as her sisters being confined to housekeeping jobs — these encounters with racism, sexism, poverty and working class exploitation would later inspire her, as a journalist, to call for equal pay and equal rights for all women of the world, starting with Black women, in order to win real change.

    Black journalism was on the rise. Between 1935 and 1936 she wrote a weekly column for the Negro Nationalist newspaper. She attended marches and rallies on matters like the Scottsboro 9 case. She was impressed by how the Communist Party’s legal defense raised the case to a national level, exposing the racist injustice of the criminal court system.

    She decided to join the Young Communist League and by 1937 was elected to its National Council. In the 1940s she became associate editor of the Weekly Review. Her weekly column, “The Quiz,” answered questions on religion, the Soviet Union and other political inquiries.

    She was editor in chief of the Political Score, which responded to political and social events and racial concerns surrounding the African-American struggle. She wrote “Half the World,” where she noted that the Communist Party needed to refine its position on gender and asserted that “white women need to be clear that the Negro question is prior to, and not equal to the women question.” She met with some criticism but stood firm in her belief that as the position of Black women advances, so will the entire social structure.

    Her assessment was that “women bore the brunt of the culture’s economic and social exploitation and since women made up half the world population, no attempt to move society forward is possible if half the population remains unaccounted for and under-represented.” Between 1945 and 1946 she was Editor of Negro Affairs in the Daily Worker and was elected a full member of the National Committee of the Communist Party.

    FBI agents had begun infiltrating her rallies and meetings to build a case against her for expulsion from the U.S. As she became more influential within the Communist Party in relation to her anti-imperialist views, the FBI seized upon the fact that no birth records identified her as a U.S. citizen.

    Jones was arrested for deportation on Jan. 19, 1948, but released on $1,000 bond a day later. FBI records show a firestorm of protests and petitions against her deportation.

    The FBI continued to plant agents at every rally and event she participated in. Jones was arrested again in 1951 with many other party members, including Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, under the Smith Act. Because of a speech she had given on International Women’s Day that challenged the overall male patriarchal establishment, she was charged with plotting the overthrow of the government. Her bail was raised higher this time.

    Jones was sentenced to one year in prison but remained free on appeal. In 1955 the Supreme Court refused to hear her case and she was sent to federal prison, where she suffered a heart attack. She never recovered and her health began to interfere with her journalism.

    Finally she was released but was forced into exile in Britain. She found refuge in the Caribbean community of Notting Hill, where she eventually became the Mother of Carnival.

    There she also founded the West Indian Gazette an Afro-Asian Caribbean newspaper in 1958. She brought both awareness and self-identity to a nation subjected to the same racist and fascist imperial oppression, with a British twist. But her health and the newspaper began to suffer as she went in and out of hospitals to battle cardiovascular disease.

    In 1964, Claudia Jones died of a heart attack. She was buried to the left of Karl Marx’s grave at London’s Highgate Cemetery. May we never forget to give her a rightful place for historical advancement and achievement in Black history and culture.
    ——————————————————————————–
    Articles copyright 1995-2010 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

    Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
    Email: [email protected]
    Page printed from:
    http://www.workers.org/2010/us/claudia_jones_0318/

  • Greece Hit by Strikes, Rebellions Over Austerity Plan

    Greece hit by strikes, riots over austerity plan

    By ELENA BECATOROS, Associated Press Writer

    ATHENS, Greece – Serious street clashes erupted between rioting youths and police in central Athens Thursday as some 30,000 people demonstrated during a nationwide strike against the cash-strapped government’s austerity measures.

    Hundreds of masked and hooded youths punched and kicked motorcycle police, knocking several off their bikes, as riot police responded with volleys of tear gas and stun grenades.

    The violence spread after the end of the march to a nearby square, where police faced off with stone-throwing anarchists and suffocating clouds of tear gas sent patrons scurrying from open-air cafes.

    Police say 12 suspected rioters were detained and two officers were injured.

    Rioters used sledge hammers to smash the glass fronts of more than a dozen shops, banks, jewelers and a cinema. Youths also set fire to rubbish bins and a car, smashed bus stops, and chopped blocks off marble balustrades and building facades to use as projectiles.

    Thursday’s strike — the second in a week — brought the country to a virtual standstill, grounding all flights and bringing public transport to a halt. State hospitals were left with emergency staff only and all news broadcasts were suspended as workers walked off the job for 24 hours to protest spending cuts and tax hikes designed to tackle the country’s debt crisis.

    Riot police made heavy use of tear gas during the start-and-stop clashes throughout the demonstration, including outside Parliament. Strikers and protesters banged drums and chanted slogans such as “no sacrifice for plutocracy,” and “real jobs, higher pay.” People draped banners from apartment buildings reading: “No more sacrifices, war against war.”

    The demonstrators included hundreds of black-clad anarchists in crash helmets and ski masks, who repeatedly taunted and attacked riot police with stones and petrol bombs, at one point spraying officers with brown paint. Shopkeepers along the demonstration route hastily rolled down their shutters, while a few blocks away, people sat at outdoor restaurants, nonchalantly continuing their meals.

    Tear gas wafted through the city center’s streets, sending businessmen in suits scurrying for cover, their eyes streaming.

    Minor clashes also broke out in the northern city of Thessaloniki, where about 14,000 people marched through the center.

    Fears of a Greek default have undermined the euro for all 16 countries that share it, putting the Greek government under intense European Union pressure to quickly show fiscal improvement.

    It has announced an additional euro4,8 billion ($65.33 billion) in savings through public sector salary cuts, hiring and pension freezes and consumer tax hikes to deal with its ballooning deficit, but the measures have led to a new wave of labor discontent.

    The cutbacks, added to a previous euro11.2 billion ($15.24 billion) austerity plan, seek to reduce the country’s budget deficit from 12.7 percent of annual output to 8.7 percent this year. The long-term target is to bring overspending below the EU ceiling of 3 percent of GDP in 2012.

    The new plan sparked a wave of strikes and protests from labor unions whose reaction to the initial austerity measures had been muted. Thursday’s strike shut down all public services and schools, leaving ferries tied up at port and suspending all news broadcasts for the day. However, some private bank branches were open despite calls from the bank employees’ union to participate in the strike.

    While their colleagues clashed with groups of protesters, some police joined the demonstration.

    About 200 uniformed police, coast guard and fire brigade officers, who cannot go on strike but can hold protests, gathered at a square in the center of the city shortly before the marches got under way.

    “The police and other security forces have been particularly hard hit by the new measures because our salaries are very low,” said Yiannis Fanariotis, general secretary of one police association. He said the average policeman made about euro1,000-euro1,200 ($1,360-$1,635) a month if weekend and night shifts were included.

    Joining the protest “doesn’t feel strange, because we are working people like everybody else and we are all shouting out for our rights,” he said.

    The government says the tough cuts are its only way to dig Greece out of a crisis that has hammered the common European currency and alarmed international markets — inflating the loan-dependent country’s borrowing costs.

    But unions say ordinary Greeks are being called to pay a disproportionate price for past fiscal mismanagement.

    “They are trying to make workers pay the price for this crisis,” said Yiannis Panagopoulos, leader of Greece’s largest union, the GSEE.

    “These measures will not be effective and will throw the economy into deep freeze.”

    A general strike last Friday was marred by violence during a large protest march. Riot police used tear gas and baton charges against rock-throwing protesters, who smashed banks and storefronts, while left-wing protesters roughed up Panagopoulos as he was addressing a rally.

    The labor unrest could spark fears that the government will have trouble in implementing its new measures.

    Greece insists it doesn’t need a bailout, and its European partners are reluctant to fund one. But it has called for European and international support for its program, saying that unless it receives that support and the cost for it to borrow on the market falls, it might have to appeal to the International Monetary Fund for help.

    On Wednesday night, Deputy Prime Minister Theodore Pangalos said Greece could bypass the costly process of borrowing from edgy markets by urging international institutions to buy its bonds at a set interest rate.

    “We want, if there is an unjustified speculative attack against Greek bonds, to know that one of these institutions that have the substantial means to absorb such market products will come and say ‘look here, I am buying Greek bonds at this price, with this interest rate,’” Pangalos told private Mega TV.

    He did not say which institutions he was referring to, or elaborate on the interest rate.

    Markets think some kind of rescue would be organized if default looms. Speculation has focused on possible guarantees for Greek bonds or help from state-owned banks in other eurozone countries.

  • Detroit Demonstration Against War & Injustice: Money For Our City, Not War & Bank Bailouts!, Fri., March 19

    For Immediate Release

    Media Advisory

    DETROIT DEMONSTRATION AGAINST WAR & INJUSTICE

    “MONEY FOR OUR CITY, NOT WAR & BANK BAILOUTS!!!

    Friday, March 19
    4:00pm: Gather at the “Spirit of Detroit”, Woodward at Jefferson, Downtown
    4:30: Rally and Speak Out Against War and For Jobs, Income, Housing, Healthcare and Education
    5:00: March thru Downtown to Central United Methodist Church
    6:00: Discussion on “How to End War and Win Economic Justice”

    This year marks the 7th anniversary of the U.S. military invasion and occupation of Iraq. During the course of the war 4,400 troops have been killed and over 42,000 wounded. Hundreds of thousands more have suffered lifelong injuries and disabilities.

    In Afghanistan, since 2001, over 1,000 U.S. troops have been killed and thousands wounded. The Obama administration has announced the deployment of tens of thousands more troops to kill and maim the civilian population.

    More tragically, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, Afghans and Pakistanis have died as a result of the U.S. and NATO occupations. Millions more have been injured and displaced.

    At the same time in the U.S., over 15 million have lost their jobs, homes, healthcare and access to quality education. The government has bailed out the banks, insurance companies and automotive firms to the tune of trillions of dollars. Just think how many jobs could have been created with these funds. How many homes could have been saved? The 50 million people living without health insurance could have access to quality care. Hundreds of schools could have remained opened in Detroit and throughout the state of Michigan.

    Join us in our efforts to build a powerful movement to end all imperialist wars and provide housing, jobs, income, healthcare and quality education to everyone in the U.S.

    Sponsors: Michigan Emergency Committee Against War & Injustice (MECAWI; Moratorium NOW! Coalition to Stop Foreclosures, Evictions & Utility Shut-offs; Fight Imperialism Stand Together (FIST)
    Endorsed by: The Michigan Coalition for Human Rights Youth Board; The Detroit Coalition Against Police Brutality; Coalition to Restore Hope to DPS

    For More Info: 313.671.3715, 887.6466
    E-mail: [email protected]
    URL: http://www.mecawi.org

  • Detroit Town Hall Meeting on the Unemployment Crisis: Fight For a Public Jobs Program NOW!, Sat. March 27

    For Immediate

    Media Advisory

    Event: Town Hall Meeting on the Unemployment Crisis, Sat., March 27, 1:00-3:00pm
    Location: Central United Methodist Church, 23 E. Adams, at Woodward, Downtown
    Contact: 313.680.5508
    E-mail: [email protected]
    URL: http://www.moratorium-mi.org or http://www.mecawi.org

    Detroit Town Hall to Speak Out for Jobs Now!: Celebrate the 75th Anniversary of the WPA

    At the height of the Great Depression of the 1930s, President Roosevelt created the Works Progress Administration (WPA) on April 8, 1935. The WPA put over 8 million unemployed people to work directly.

    Today, 2010, with tens of million of workers–especially youth–unemployed, we need a real, public jobs program, NOW! We can’t wait for some imaginary future jobs from the banks and corporations who have already been bailed out with trillions of our tax dollars.

    The government can and must open hiring halls in every neighborhood and get people back to work. In the 1930s, the Detroit WPA built Western High School and City Airport and upgraded the Detroit Zoo among many other projects. There is plenty that needs doing immediately in Detroit–repairing roads and bridges, cleaning parks, insulating and fixing up thousands of vacant homes so no one is homeless or without heat.

    The Full Employment Act makes it the government’s duty to put everyone to work–it’s the law! Let’s organize and tell the politicians–A REAL, PUBLIC JOBS PROGRAM NOW!

  • The Angola Three: 37 Years of Solitary Confinement

    37 Years of Solitary Confinement: The Angola Three

    Thursday, March 11 2010 @ 02:51 AM UT

    Angola prison, the state penitentiary of Louisiana, is the biggest prison in America. Built on the site of a former slave plantation, the 1,800-acre penal complex is home to more than 5,000 prisoners, the majority of whom will never walk the streets again as free men.

    Also known as the Farm, Angola took its name from the homeland of the slaves who used to work its fields, and in many ways still resembles a slave plantation today. Eighty per cent of the prisoners are African-Americans and, under the watchful eye of armed guards on horseback, they still work fields of sugar cane, cotton and corn, for up to 16 hours a day.

    “You’ve got to keep the inmates working all day so they’re tired at night,” says Warden Burl Cain, a committed evangelist who believes that the rehabilitation of convicts is only possible through Christian redemption.

    37 Years of Solitary Confinement: The Angola Three

    By Erwin James, The Guardian
    March 10, 2009

    Angola prison, the state penitentiary of Louisiana, is the biggest prison in America. Built on the site of a former slave plantation, the 1,800-acre penal complex is home to more than 5,000 prisoners, the majority of whom will never walk the streets again as free men.

    Also known as the Farm, Angola took its name from the homeland of the slaves who used to work its fields, and in many ways still resembles a slave plantation today. Eighty per cent of the prisoners are African-Americans and, under the watchful eye of armed guards on horseback, they still work fields of sugar cane, cotton and corn, for up to 16 hours a day. “You’ve got to keep the inmates working all day so they’re tired at night,” says Warden Burl Cain, a committed evangelist who believes that the rehabilitation of convicts is only possible through Christian redemption.

    Undoubtedly there is less violence and abuse among the prisoners under his wardenship than there was under his predecessors. But Angola is still a long way from being a “positive environment that promotes responsibility, goodness, and humanity”, as he proclaims in the prison’s mission statement. In fact at the heart of Cain’s prison regime is an inhumanity that would make Jesus weep.

    For more than 37 years, two prisoners, Herman Wallace and Albert Woodfox, have been locked down in Angola’s maximum security Closed Cell Restricted (CCR) block – the longest period of solitary confinement in American prison history.

    Having experienced the isolation of “23-hour bang-up” during my own 20 years of imprisonment, for offences of which I was guilty, I can attest to the mental impact that such conditions inflict. My first year was spent on a high-security landing where the cell doors were opened only briefly for meals and emptying of toilet buckets.

    If decent-minded prison officers were on duty we were allowed to walk the yard for 30 minutes a day. The rest of the time we were alone. The cells were 10ft x 5ft, with a chair, a table and a bed. You could walk up and down, run on the spot, stand still, or do push-ups and sit-ups – but sooner or later you had to just stop, and think.

    As the days, weeks and months blur into one, without realising it you start to live completely inside your head. You dream about the past, in vivid detail – and fantasise about the future, for fantasies are all you have. You panic but it’s no good “getting on the bell” – unless you’re dying – and, even then, don’t hope for a speedy response. I had a lot to think about. When the man in the cell above mine hanged himself I thought about that, a lot. I still do. You look at the bars on the high window and think how easy it would be to be free of all the thinking.

    Such thoughts must have crossed the minds of Wallace and Woodfox more than once during their isolation. They are fed through the barred gates of their 9ft x 6ft cells and allowed only one hour of exercise every other day alone in a small caged yard. Their capacity for psychological endurance alone is noteworthy.

    Wallace and Woodfox were confined to solitary after being convicted of murdering Angola prison guard Brent Miller in 1972. But the circumstances of their trial was so suspect that there are no doubts among their supporters that these men are innocent. Even Brent Miller’s widow, Teenie Verret, has her reservations. “If they did not do this,” she says, “and I believe that they didn’t, they have been living a nightmare.”

    One man who understands the nightmare that Wallace and Woodfox are living more than anyone else is Robert King. King was also convicted of a murder in Angola in 1973, and was held in solitary alongside Wallace and Woodfox for 29 years, until his conviction was overturned in 2001 and he was freed. Together, King, Wallace and Woodfox have become known as the “Angola three”.

    The case of the Angola three first came to international attention following the campaigning efforts of the Body Shop founder and humanitarian Anita Roddick. Roddick heard about their plight from a young lawyer named Scott Fleming. Fleming was working as a prisoner advocate in the 1990s when he received a letter from Wallace asking for help.

    The human tragedy Fleming uncovered had the most profound effect on him. When he qualified as a lawyer, their case became his first. “I was born in 1973,” he says. “I often think that for my entire life they have been in solitary.”

    Through Fleming, Roddick met King and then Woodfox in Angola. Their story, she said later, “made my blood run cold in my veins”. Until her death in 2007 Roddick was a committed and passionate supporter of their cause. At her memorial service King played two taped messages from Wallace and Woodfox.

    In the congregation was film-maker Vadim Jean who had become good friends with Roddick and her husband Gordon during an earlier film project. “Anita’s big thing was, ‘Just do something,’” says Jean. “No matter how small an act of kindness. Listening to Herman and Albert’s voices at her memorial was like having Anita’s finger pointing at me and saying, ‘Just do something’.” And so he decided to make In the Land of the Free, a searing documentary, released later this month.

    The story Jean’s film tells is one that has resonance on many levels. All three men were from poor black neighbourhoods In New Orleans. They grew up fearing the police, who would regularly “clear the books” of crimes in the area, according to King, by pinning then on disaffected young black men. “If I saw the police, I used to run,” King says.

    He admits to being involved in petty crime in his early years, but “nothing vicious”. Eventually King was arrested for an armed robbery he says he did not commit and was sentenced to 35 years, which he began in New Orleans parish prison – and there he met Albert Woodfox.

    Woodfox had also been sentenced for armed robbery – and given 50 years. On the day he was sentenced he escaped from the courthouse. He made his way to Harlem in New York, where he encountered the Black Panthers, the revolutionary African-American political movement.

    He witnessed the Panthers engaging with the community in a positive, constructive way, educating and informing people of their rights. He says it was the first time in his life that he had seen African-Americans exhibiting real pride, pride that emanated from the young activists, he says, “like a shimmering heatwave”.

    Two days later Woodfox was caught and taken to New York’s Tombs prison where he saw first-hand the militant tactics of imprisoned Panthers who resisted their guards with organised protests. In Tombs, Woodfox was labelled “militant” and sent back to New Orleans where he joined King on the parish prison block, known – due to the high concentration of Panther activists – as “the Panther tier”. There Woodfox became a member of the Black Panther party.

    Outside, confrontations between the Panthers – described by FBI director J Edgar Hoover as “the greatest threat to the internal security of the country” – and the police were escalating. In an attempt to undermine the influence of the Panthers in New Orleans parish prison, officials tried to shoehorn men they termed “Black Gangsters” on to the tier – men like Wallace, also serving decades for armed robbery.

    One day Wallace was suffering from the pain of ill-fitting shoes. One of the Panthers, on his way to a court appearance, took his shoes off and handed them to Wallace. “Right then I knew that that was what I needed to be a part of,” he says. In the summer of 1971 Wallace and Woodfox were shipped to Angola.

    The civil rights bill had been signed in 1964, but seven years later Angola was still operating a segregated regime. Prisoner guards carried guns and were also responsible, according to well-documented sources, for organising systematic sexual abuse of vulnerable prisoners, which flourished in the prison’s mostly dormitory accommodation. And violence between prisoners had reached such levels that Angola was known as “the bloodiest prison in America”.

    Woodfox and Wallace quickly extended the New Orleans chapter of the Black Panthers into Angola, establishing classes in political ideology and exposing injustices. They organised work stoppages, demonstrating to fellow prisoners the liberating power of acting with a “unity of purpose” and worked to eradicate the prevalent sexual abuses. But their political activities made them targets for the administrators. By the spring of 1972, tensions in the prison were dangerously high.

    These were the conditions in which Brent Miller met his untimely death. That April, a prisoner work strike drew the attention of the guards who were called from normal duties to deal with the disturbance. Miller, a strong, athletic young man of 23, stayed behind alone. He entered a dormitory holding 90 prisoners and sat on an elderly prisoner’s bed, drinking coffee and chatting. Moments later he was attacked and stabbed 32 times.

    Two days later, four men identified as “black militants”, including Wallace and Woodfox, were accused of the murder. It was quickly ascertained that one of the four had been inserted into the case by the prison administration. Charges against him were dropped. Another, Chester Jackson, admitted to holding Miller while the guard was stabbed to death.

    Jackson turned state’s evidence in return for a plea to manslaughter. The case was tried in a town called St Francisville, the closest courthouse to Angola. The jury had been picked from the local populace, many of whom earned their living from the prison or had families and friends that worked there; all were white. Wallace and Woodfox were found guilty of Miller’s murder, sentenced to life imprisonment without parole and taken from the court straight to Angola’s CCR block to begin their life in isolation.

    Robert King was brought to Angola from the parish prison two weeks after Miller’s killing, as part of a roundup of black radicals. King had never met Miller and was in a prison 150 miles away when the murder took place. Yet he was investigated for the crime and identified as a “conspirator” before being transferred to lockdown on CCR alongside Wallace and Woodcock.

    The following year a prisoner named August Kelly was murdered on King’s CCR tier. A man named Grady Brewer admitted that he alone was responsible for the killing, which he said he carried out in self-defence. But King was also charged. The two men faced trial together in the same St Francisville courthouse where Wallace and Woodfox had been convicted the year before. The sole evidence against King came from flawed prisoner testimony. He and Brewer had not been allowed to speak to their attorneys for any length of time before their trial.

    When they protested, the judge ordered their hands to be shackled behind their backs and their mouths gagged with duct tape for the duration of their trial. The men were convicted and sentenced to life without parole. King later won an appeal; the federal court ruled that he had not been sufficiently unruly in the dock to warrant the shackling and gagging. He went back to trial in 1975, was re-convicted and immediately sent back to CCR.

    When, after Scott Fleming’s intervention in the case of Wallace and Woodfox in the 1990s, new lawyers reviewed the original trial of both men, discovering “obfuscation after obfuscation”. The state had used a number of jailhouse informants against them, many of whom gave contradictory accounts of what they saw. One was registered blind. The key witness in the case was a man called Hezikiah Brown who testified he witnessed the murder.

    In his initial statement to investigators however, Brown said he had not seen anything. Three days later, when he was taken from his bunk at midnight by prison officials and promised his freedom if he testified, he agreed to say that he saw Wallace and Woodfox kill Miller. At the time Brown was serving life without parole for multiple rapes. Immediately after he agreed to testify he was given his own minimum security private house in the prison grounds and a weekly cigarette ration.

    Wallace and Woodfox did not give up. They fought their convictions from their cells and in 1993 Woodfox was granted an appeal, forcing a new trial. The case was sent back to the same courthouse to be tried in front of a new grand jury. A local author, Anne Butler, who had published a book in which she detailed the case and was convinced that the right people had been convicted, acted as jury chairperson.

    No witnesses were called. Instead Butler was called upon to explain the case. Once again, the jury was composed of people who worked in Angola or were related to people who worked there. Butler’s husband and co-author was Murray Henderson, who had been the warden of Angola when Brent Miller was murdered.

    It is worth noting that Henderson was a key member of the original investigation team and that, during that investigation, a bloody fingerprint was found close to Brent Miller’s body. It was determined that it did not belong to Woodfox nor to Wallace, but despite the prison holding all the fingerprints of all the prisoners, no attempt was made to find out whose it was. The bloody print was also ignored at Woodfox’s retrial. He was reconvicted and sent back to isolation in Angola’s CCR.

    It was 26 years before King won the right to another appeal. In 2001 the Federal court found that the jury in King’s original trial had systematically excluded African-Americans and women and agreed that the case should be reheard. This time around the prisoner witnesses recanted and the federal court sent the case back to the district court for review. The state negotiated a deal with King. Reluctantly, and with his left hand raised instead of his right, he pleaded guilty to conspiracy; an hour and a half later he was freed.

    In September 2008, Woodfox’s conviction was overturned; the federal court ruled that his core constitutional rights had been violated at his original trial. Louisiana attorney general Buddy Caldwell could have set Woodfox free immediately. Instead he decided to contest the federal decision and Woodfox, now 64, was returned to Angola’s CCR, where he remains. Herman Wallace, now 68, was moved to another Louisiana prison last year, where he too continues to be held in solitary confinement.

    Today King, now 67, is still campaigning for justice for his friends. Albert Woodfox: “Our primary objective is that front gate. That is what we are struggling for and we are actually fighting for our freedom. We are fighting for people to understand that we were framed for a murder that we are totally, completely and actually innocent of.” Robert King says he is free of Angola, but until his friends are free, “Angola will never be free of me.”

    Jean hopes his film will make a difference. “These men need help,” he says. “Louisiana needs to be shamed into doing the right thing.”

    Further information: angola3.org . If you wish to help highlight the plight of the Angola 3, you can write to the Governor of Louisiana at the Office of the Governor, PO Box 94004, Baton Rouge, LA 70804, US.

    In the Land of the Free is released on 26 March.

  • Financially Pinched, Young Adults Lose Faith in American Economic System

    March 9, 2010

    Poll: Financially Pinched, Young Adults Lose Faith

    By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Filed at 5:15 p.m. ET

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Young adults are financially anxious, worried that they can’t meet their educational, housing and health care needs, according to a new poll that exposes a growing pessimism about achieving the American Dream.

    The poll by Harvard’s Institute of Politics found that six out of 10 of those surveyed worry they may not meet their current bills and obligations. Nearly half of those attending college wonder whether they will be able to afford to stay in school. And more than eight out of 10 said they expect difficulty finding a job after graduation.

    Fewer than half said they believe they will be better off than their parents when they reach their parents’ age.

    With the country in the midst of a slow economic recovery with nearly 10 percent unemployment, the data finds a deep sense of gloom among 18-29 year olds. The grim mood could have immediate political consequences, and it could also shape that generation’s long-term faith in government and in its ability to improve their daily lives.

    ”We have a generation that is committed to their community, but unless they can restore their levels of trust in some of the big American institutions, we will have lost a great opportunity to engage some of the best and brightest,” Institute of Politics polling director John Della Volpe said.

    Four out of 10 respondents described themselves as politically independent, 36 percent affiliated themselves with Democrats and 23 percent said they considered themselves Republican. But young Republicans displayed more enthusiasm for the 2010 midterm elections, with those who said they disapproved of President Barack Obama’s job performance saying they were more likely to vote than those who said they approved of his performance.

    Still, Obama enjoys a 56 percent approval rating among young adults, even though majorities of 51 to 56 percent disapprove of how he has handled high-profile issues during his first year in office, including health care, the economy, the federal deficit, Iran and Afghanistan.

    The distinction that these voters make between the president and the issues worries Democratic politicians who fear they will not benefit from Obama’s appeal.

    Nearly four out of 10 of those surveyed said the country was on the wrong track. About as many said they were unsure about the country’s direction. Only 23 percent said the country was headed in the right direction.

    The economy dwarfed health care and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as the issue that concerned young adults the most. Forty-five percent cited the economy as their top worry, while only 17 percent mentioned health care and 6 percent cited the wars.

    Despite their immediate financial concerns, 51 percent of these young adults said the president and Congress should seek to keep the budget deficit down, ”even though it may mean it will take longer for the economy to recover.”

    The poll surveyed 3,117 U.S. citizens between the ages of 18 and 29. It was conducted between Jan. 29 and Feb. 22, and it has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 2.3 percentage points.

    The survey was conducted by Knowledge Networks, which initially contacted people using traditional telephone and mail polling methods and followed up with online interviews. Those chosen who had no Internet access were given it for free.
    ——
    On the Net:

    Harvard Institute of Politics: http://www.iop.harvard.edu/

  • U.S./NATO Offensive Unravels in Afghanistan

    U.S./NATO offensive unravels in Afghanistan

    By Sara Flounders
    Published Mar 7, 2010 11:07 PM

    The Pentagon offensive against the Afghan city of Marjah was public-relations media hype from the very first day. The sole purpose of the offensive in Marjah was to convince the U.S. population and increasingly tepid NATO allies that this imperialist war is winnable.

    U.S. involvement in Afghanistan is now the longest foreign war in U.S. history, on both the air and the ground. The Pentagon described the Marjah offensive as the biggest military operation in more than eight years of occupation, but now calls it a prelude to a larger assault on the city of Kandahar.

    In U.S. counterinsurgency warfare, such an offensive means dropping heavily armed troops in an area seeking to draw enemy fire. The troops then call in air support, long-range artillery fire, machine-gun fire, rockets, white phosphorous bombs and anti-personnel bombs. The latter cover the ground with bomblets that emit thousands of razor-sharp fragments.

    Tens of thousands of civilians were driven from the villages of Helmand Province, and the town of Marjah was partially evacuated. But thousands of Afghans were unwilling to leave their homes and animals in the cold of winter for the hunger, instability and flimsy shelter of refugee camps. Many are too poor to leave. They ended up as targets of Pentagon weapons.

    The Marjah offensive’s stated goal was to introduce a ready-made, U.S.-created local regime, staffed by an Afghan puppet administration totally dependent on U.S. power. With cynical and racist arrogance, NATO commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal said, “We got a government in a box ready to roll in.” (New York Times, Feb. 12)

    Afghan casualties unrecorded

    Throughout this war, the Pentagon and corporate media have never counted and scarcely mentioned Afghan civilian deaths, injuries and trauma from bombings, fires and destruction. Tens of thousands more die of starvation, cold and infections in crowded refugees camps, swollen cities and isolated villages.

    During the U.S. offensive in Marjah, U.S. deaths in Afghanistan reached the milestone of 1,000. This total confirms that youth are paying the price of the lack of education and job opportunities in the U.S. In addition, suicides among returning soldiers now exceed combat deaths and injuries are about four times the deaths.

    Gen. Barry McCaffrey at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point warned of sharp increases in U.S. troop casualties in the months ahead. “What I want to do is signal that this thing is going to be $5 billion to $10 billion a month and 300 to 500 killed and wounded a month by next summer. That’s what we probably should expect.” (Army Times, Jan. 7)

    As the two-week offensive officially ended in Marjah, bombs exploded in one of the most secure areas of Kabul. Some reporters described it as a sophisticated and well-coordinated operation in the heavily guarded capital. A car bomb targeted housing of employees from countries connected to the occupation, apparently with the aim of undermining international support for the Afghan war.

    During the offensive came the announcement on Feb. 21 that the Netherlands coalition government had fallen apart, due to heated opposition of a coalition party to keeping Dutch troops in Afghanistan. This sealed the planned withdrawal of 2,000 Dutch troops from NATO forces in Afghanistan, as of next August.

    The Netherlands was the first NATO member to announce that it is quitting. The announcement was a big setback for the U.S. and NATO, and has prompted wide media speculation of other possible NATO withdrawals from the deeply unpopular war.

    A Los Angeles Times editorial on Feb. 24 stated that the Dutch “withdrawal is likely to raise concerns about a fracturing of the international commitment to Afghanistan, and about the Afghan government’s ability to provide security in the long term . … The Dutch decision should serve as a warning to the Obama administration.”

    The majority of the people in almost all the NATO countries opposes the war and wants their troops out. This has become a major issue in domestic politics and elections in many countries. Canada has announced the withdrawal of its forces by the summer of 2011.

    Anti-war mood undermines NATO militarism

    Following the Dutch announcement, U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates in a speech at the National Defense University told NATO officers and officials that public and political opposition to the military had grown so great in Europe that it was directly affecting operations in Afghanistan and impeding the alliance’s broader goals. “The demilitarization of Europe — where large swaths of the general public and political class are averse to military force and the risks that go with it — has gone from a blessing in the 20th century to an impediment. … Right now the alliance faces very serious, long-term, systemic problems.” (New York Times, Feb. 24)

    Gates also reminded NATO officials that, not counting U.S. forces, NATO troops in Afghanistan were scheduled to increase to 50,000 this year — from 30,000 last year.

    The total 43-country International Security Assistance Force, including U.S. soldiers, is presently at 140,000 troops in Afghanistan.

    As journalist Rick Rozoff summed up a year ago: “The Afghan war is also the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s first armed conflict outside of Europe and its first ground war in the 60 years of its existence. It has been waged with the participation of armed units from all 26 NATO member states and 12 other European and Caucasus nations linked to NATO. …

    “The 12 European NATO partners who have sent troops in varying numbers to assist Washington and the Alliance include the continent’s five former neutral nations: Austria, Finland, Ireland, Sweden and Switzerland. The European NATO and partnership deployments count among their number troops from six former Soviet Republics — with Azerbaijan, Georgia and Ukraine tapped for recent reinforcements and the three Baltic states … including airbases and troop and naval deployments in Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Pakistan and the Indian Ocean (where the Japanese navy has been assisting).” (rickrozoff.wordpress.com, March 25, 2009)

    Military units from Australia, New Zealand, Jordan, Colombia and South Korea are also stationed in Afghanistan.

    Afghans have right to resist

    Despite all these occupation forces, Afghanistan has become an imperialist quagmire with no stability, no security and no end in sight.

    The resistance in Afghanistan has gained ground and broad support as it becomes clear to the whole population that U.S./NATO forces have brought only racist arrogance, corruption, repression and greater poverty. While occupation forces label all resistance as terrorism and Taliban-inspired, increasingly Afghans see resistance as a right and a patriotic or religious duty. It is essential in the period ahead that the anti-war movement supports the right of the Afghan people to resist this criminal occupation and increases the effort to bring all troops home now.

    Articles copyright 1995-2010 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

    Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
    Email: [email protected]
    Page printed from:
    http://www.workers.org/2010/world/afghanistan_0311/

  • Zimbabwe Celebrates International Women’s Day

    Zimbabwe celebrates Women’s Day

    By Richmore Tera
    Zimbabwe Herald

    THE National Art Gallery of Zimbabwe in collaboration with the embassies of Canada and Spain, recently held a series of arts events as part of commemorations to mark International Women’s Day.

    International Women’s Day is observed on March 8 every year to celebrate the achievements that women the world over have made in the areas of politics, economy and the arts, among others.

    Various women artistes from all walks of the Zimbabwean life took turns to showcase their art works while at the same time speaking on issues affecting them as women.

    A film screening held under the theme “It’s Time African Women Join Hands to Fight Domestic Violence,” exposed the ugly sides of domestic violence. The late female sculptor Colleen Madamombe was remembered through a posthumous sculpture exhibition dubbed “A Brief Life,” featuring some of her works. She was one of the few local female visual artists who put Zimbabwe on the world map before her untimely death.

    That women are also as good as their male counterparts when it comes to playing musical instruments like the mbira and saxophone was evident when various artistes took to the stage to thrill the audience.

    Gifted mbira player Hope Masike was in fine form, while Praise Nyandimu and Jazz Kisses Band from Mutare, also impressed.

    Born Free, Misfit, Sister Xapa, Oasis, Aura and Cynthia vented women’s concerns through their poetry, hip hop and dance performances.

    As what has become a norm, renowned filmmaker and author Tsitsi Dangarembga and fellow writer Virginia Phiri stimulated interesting debate on the theme of the day with their incisive presentations.

    Fashion, that is an integral part of women, also came under the spotlight with various designers including those from Zimbabwe Fashion Week taking turns to showcase their various designer-wares.

    “The Portrayal of Women in the Mainstream Media” was another thought-provoking discussion in the way that the speakers probed the various facets through which women are often projected in a stereotypical way in the media.

    Canadian Ambassador to Zimbabwe Barbara Richardson gave the opening remarks while her Spanish counterpart delivered the closing speech.

  • U.S. Imperialism and the War Against Zimbabwe

    US declares war against Zim

    By Tichaona Zindoga
    Zimbabwe Herald

    It is a war. Last week United States president Barack Obama announced he was extending US sanctions on Zimbabwe for another year as his country continued with the “national emergency” against Zimbabwe that, he repeated, posed a “continuing and extraordinary threat to US foreign policy.’’

    “I am continuing for one year the national emergency with respect to the actions and policies of certain members of the Government of Zimbabwe and other persons to undermine Zimbabwe’s democratic processes or institutions,” Obama said in a statement.

    “The crisis constituted by the actions and policies of certain members of the Government of Zimbabwe and other persons to undermine Zimbabwe’s democratic processes or institutions has not been resolved,” he added in an apparent reference to President Mugabe, his party and perceived sympathisers and supporters.

    He declared: “These actions and policies continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States.

    “For these reasons, I have determined that it is necessary to continue this national emergency and to maintain in force the sanctions to respond to this threat.”

    US sanctions, enabled by the sanctions law, the so-called Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act passed by George W Bush in 2002, bars US public and private citizens from doing business with Zimbabwe.

    It instructs top US officers at multilateral lending institutions like IMF and World Bank to deny Zimbabwe access to funds or cancellation of indebtedness.

    Sanctions also bar certain Zimbabweans from entering the US or having investments there.

    This also applies to some journalists who have been questioning US’ unfair treatment of Zimbabwe.

    On the other hand, US sponsors what it terms “pro-democracy” organisations and individuals, who loosely defined are overthrow activists and reactionaries against veteran President Mugabe and his nationalist liberation movement, Zanu-PF.

    Obama’s latest move is his second in a space of a year, having renewed the sanctions last March.

    It also follows hard on the heels of the 27-member EU bloc’s recent resolution to extend sanctions on Zimbabwe by a further year, nominally easing the restrictions by removing nine companies and certain persons — who passed on — from the list comprising of around 200 individuals and companies.

    While there could be little surprise regarding the latest round of sanctions on Zimbabwe, there are a number of interesting points of Western involvement in Zimbabwe.

    One of these is the contempt for, or perhaps impatience with, the inclusive Government of Zimbabwe, predicated on the Global Political Agreement.

    The agreement, signed by Zanu-PF and the two MDC formations in September 2008, set the tone for political, economic and social reform in the country.

    The country’s main political parties, Zanu-PF and the two MDC formations, have been implementing the reforms, albeit painstakingly, and still continue to do so.

    Ironically, the West, which has been publicly proclaiming support for Zimbabwe in this reform agenda, has been subverting the same.

    Sanctions, which the GPA says should go in all their forms, are not only undermining the economic recovery efforts but have also been a divisive element in the Government which has been trying and, largely successfully so, to eliminate polarisation in both society and the body politic.

    The circumstances under which the US has renewed sanctions lately have an edge of keenness.

    US’ recent extension of sanctions came at a time when Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai appeared to have finally found the voice to join President Mugabe and Deputy Prime Minister Professor Arthur Mutambara in calling for the immediate and unconditional lifting of sanctions on Zimbabwe.

    Last week, Tsvangirai told visiting Danish Development Co-operation Minister Soren Pind that sanctions were affecting the full implementation of the GPA and should thus go.

    Parliament has since unanimously agreed on an anti-sanctions motion.

    It will be recalled that July 2008, after the parties had just signed the Memorandum of Understanding, which begot the GPA, the Bush regime in Washington extended the embargo on Zimbabwe.

    When Obama extended the sanctions on March 4 last year, the inclusive Government was just a couple of weeks old, with the euphoria of that momentous achievement having barely died down among people of all walks of life.

    Sadc, the African Union and many countries across the world support the inclusive Government.

    But perhaps the most critical point in US relations with Zimbabwe lies in the statement peddled since March 6, 2003’s Executive Order 13288, repeated by Obama on Monday that it was “necessary to continue this national emergency and to maintain in force the sanctions to respond” to Zimbabwe’s “unusual and extraordinary threat” to the foreign policy of the United States.

    The extension is pursuant to its International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 USC 1701-17-06).

    The 1977 Act allows freezing of assets, limiting of trade, and confiscation of property during a declared emergency.

    The US is thus virtually in a war situation with Zimbabwe.

    Authorities define a “state of emergency” as a governmental declaration that to suspend certain normal functions of government, alert citizens to alter their normal behaviour, or order government agencies to implement emergency preparedness plans.

    Such declarations, renewable by the Executive, are usually common during times of natural disasters, civil disorder, or following a declaration of war.

    The US has issued emergency declarations with respect to issues in the Middle East, Iran, September 11, among others.

    Violators of emergency declarations face punishment, and in the case of Zimbabwe, American individuals and companies stand to pay thousands of dollars in fines if they engage Zimbabwe.

    Apart from the overarching imperialist goal and the country’s characteristic importation of Britain’s bilateral wars, US policy towards Zimbabwe seems to border on something between lies, deception, hypocrisy and intrigue.

    One of the basic questions is how little Zimbabwe can pose a continuous and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of America.

    If the US — just like the EU — predicate their re-engagement with Zimbabwe on the fulfilment of the GPA, it is to be wondered how Zimbabwe’s domestic situation, which the GPA largely is, stand to pose or not pose a threat to US foreign policy.

    It is also to be wondered how the alleged “actions and policies of certain members of the Government of Zimbabwe and other persons to undermine Zimbabwe’s democratic processes or institutions” can amount to a threat to the foreign policy of America.

    The wording and tone of Obama’s latest contribution to America’s blitz on Zimbabwe shows that part of America’s foreign policy has not changed, just as been seen elsewhere, from the regressive, aggressive and senseless Bush era.

    This also shows Obama’s hypocritical side.

    When the Obama administration got into office, it promised a new era of relations with those aggrieved by George W Bush’s style of government, but it has been largely Zimbabwe — whose doors have always been open to negotiations — that Obama has continuously shunned.

    Despite the fact that the US has manifested itself to be a continuous and extraordinary threat to Zimbabwe through economic and political strangulation of the country, Washington has managed to lie to its people and the world that actions of certain Zimbabweans are a threat to America.

    (This is of course besides the point that the actions of Zimbabwe in empowering its people that have suffered colonial injustice set the tone for empowerment initiatives by oppressed peoples of the globe.)

    Propaganda is also very much a component of US war on Zimbabwe.

    Apart from the American administrations’ misleading and oft hysterical language in justifying the war, they have created, funded and hosted individuals and organisations that while systematically sanitising US aggression towards Zimbabwe, they also say and do things that necessitate American self-serving interests.

    The so-called independent media, analysts and pro-democracy groups have been part of the intricate propaganda machinery.

    And in the cover of the big lie about wanting to see democratic institutions and processes, the US with the help of the aforementioned acolytes has maintained its stranglehold on Zimbabwe.

    Yet if truth be told, the US has subverted and bastardised Zimbabwe’s institutions and processes for the whole existence of sanctions.

    This is because sanctions, which by the US’ own admission were designed to “make the economy scream”, are by their very nature anti-people yet somehow the US and its partners have transferred their culpability to the “certain individuals” in Zanu-PF.

    By funding political and media activities in and outside Zimbabwe, the US has also manipulated and suffocated Zimbabwe’s political space, institutions and processes.

    The US just does not have the moral ground to play god or disciple in matters of democracy and democratic institutions.

    Washington’s actions in Zimbabwe and elsewhere confirms such, and its economic war on Zimbabwe, which is known to stem from the desire to reverse indigenous ownership of natural resources, is as evident as it is evil, unjustifiable, and undesirable in any democratic and peace-loving society.

  • ANCYL Leader Malema Responds to Charges of Excessive Wealth

    Malema Responds to Charges of Excessive Wealth

    African National Congress Youth League (ANCYL) president Julius Malema says if anyone can prove any wrongdoing against him, they should arrest him.

    “I’m not above the law. If there is any crime I have committed, I’m asking to be arrested,” he told students at the University of Johannesburg on Tuesday.

    Malema reiterated previous statements that he has never stolen from the poor, and said he would give the R140-million reportedly in his bank account to the less fortunate.

    “If I have got R140-million, take that money and nationalise it,” he said, in an echo of his calls to nationalise the country’s mines.

    “I’m giving you the permission to take everything else you find in that account and give it to the poor.”

    Malema said the perceived “onslaught” against the youth league was not “an ordinary attack”. He said he would “never be ambushed” and never be “looted by anybody”.

    Malema also said lifestyle audits were not a concept thought up by Congress of South African Trade Unions general secretary Zwelinzima Vavi. It was a practice carried out by the Scorpions and currently by the South African Revenue Service.

    “Why should we be subjected to a factional lifestyle audit?”

    Malema again charged he was the victim of forces out to get rid of the youth league. “It you want to kill a snake … hit it hard on the head, that’s what they want to do to me.”

    ‘Nobody will remove Zuma’

    Meanwhile, Malema on Tuesday expressed support for President Jacob Zuma leading the ANC for a second term.

    “Nobody will remove Zuma. If you want to serve in the ANC, support Zuma,” said.

    “That [Zuma] is the only man guaranteed in 2012 for a second term.”

    Malema also alluded to the youth league not wanting ANC secretary general Gwede Mantashe to be part of the party’s leadership in 2012, wanting him to replaced by Fikile Mbalula.

    “But in that top six there is one man who will not be coming back … who has isolated himself from the ANC,” Malema said.

    He, however, dismissed reports of plans to oust Mantashe at the ANC’s September national general council, saying all current leaders would complete their five-year term.

    Malema claimed that whatever the youth league pronounced on would be the outcome of the 2012 leadership race.

    He condemned accusations against some ANC leaders made by Cosatu, as well as criticism by the union federation of Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan and Zuma.

    Malema expressed concern over the “apartheid regime of the Western Cape” under the premiership of Democratic Alliance leader Helen Zille.

    He accused her of demolishing churches in Khayelitsha and dragging the elderly out of their places of worship.

    “Helen Zille, who is suffering from Satanism, has gone all out to demolish the churches in the Western Cape. She is exposing herself … people there will know they voted for a monster.” — Sapa

  • Guinea Sets Presidential Poll Date

    Sunday, March 07, 2010
    23:21 Mecca time, 20:21 GMT

    Guinea sets presidential poll date

    Camara is recovering in Burkina Faso after an attempt on his life by a
    close aide

    Guinea’s rulers have said they country will hold a presidential
    election on June 27, the first since a military coup in December last
    year.

    The main electoral commission proposed the date last month and the decree was signed by General Sekouba Konate, the country’s interim leader on Sunday.

    “The transition president, [the] interim president of the republic,
    sets the date of the first round of the presidential election for June
    27,” the decree said.

    The commission said a second round should be held on July 18 if no candidate got an absolute majority.

    It also proposed that campaigning run from May 17 to June 26.

    Military coup

    The interim government was established with the help of international mediators in the wake of an assassination attempt on Captain Moussa Dadis Camara, the then-leader of the country’s military government.

    Camara, who was shot in the head by an aide, is recuperating in
    neighbouring Burkina Faso.

    Ahead of the assassination attempt Guinea had been thrown into
    political turmoil when a security force crackdown on September 28 saw the massacre of 156 protesters.

    A United Nations report released in December blamed Camara for the massacre.

    The killings occurred as opposition supporters staged a rally amid
    concerns that Camara – who seized power in 2008 after the death of
    Lansana Conte, Guinea’s long-time ruler – was planning to renege on a pledge to hold civilian elections.

    Besides scores who died after soldiers opened fire in the city’s main
    sports stadium, more than 100 women were reportedly raped during the incident.

    Source: Agencies

  • Workers World Interview With Youth Leader: Country-wide Struggle Unites Students, Workers, Community

    WW interview with youth leader: Country-wide struggle unites students, workers, community

    Published Mar 7, 2010 11:12 PM

    Hundreds of thousands of students, teachers and other education
    workers demonstrated, rallied, sat in and marched across the United
    States on March 4. Protesting cuts in education budgets and layoffs,
    they raised the powerful demand that education is a right of the
    working class. A national leader of this action is Larry Hales of the
    youth organization Fight Imperialism, Stand Together. Hales had
    mobilized for the national action and co-chaired a rally of 2,000
    people outside New York Gov. David Paterson’s office in midtown New York City. Hales spoke with Workers World managing editor John Catalinotto and explained the issues propelling this new movement, how the mobilization grew and what’s next.

    Workers World: What were the issues driving this massive student-led demonstration?

    Larry Hales: The movement to defend education comes at a critical
    time. Youth unemployment, at depression levels for a long time among young people of color, has again spiked drastically. In inner city areas the buildings are dilapidated. Functioning schools are being closed and privatized. Young people know they need education to get jobs. The education crisis combines with the economic crisis to compel this struggle.

    People in the streets are questioning the system. They raise
    “education is a right” and they see they are being denied that right.
    Unemployed youth believe going to school will help them get a job. In
    New York’s City University [CUNY], enrollment has actually grown as
    much as 40 percent. Now that right to education is being attacked.
    This is the main motivation.

    How much of the country was involved in the movement?

    We have reports of 126 actions in 33 states. There might be more we
    haven’t heard from yet. There were hundreds of thousands in California alone. In New York 2,000 people rallied outside Gov. Paterson’s office, including a good contingent from the Professional Staff Congress, representing the city university workers and teachers. Most marched to the Fashion Institute of Technology to join an action the Transport Workers Union had organized. Thousands took part.

    What was behind the dramatic action of Baltimore high-school students who besieged the detention center?

    The Baltimore Algebra Project called this action. The group is a
    peer-to-peer tutoring organization with a political component. It
    promotes the interest of students and young people, like fighting
    school closings and for funding for student and youth jobs.

    I had attended a meeting where BAP planned to demand the government take the funds they use to lock people up and use it for jobs. We gave out flyers for March 4. They invited me to meet with them and I did, along with a Workers World Party comrade from Baltimore, Stephen Ceci.

    They were pushing a national student bill of rights. A week after we
    met, they told me they would organize a meeting in front of the
    Juvenile Detention Center, demanding $100 million to create jobs for
    young people.

    A thousand mainly high-school youths marched on the center; 13 pushed inside and occupied the building. There were no arrests. The youths made their point in this courageous and militant way for jobs, not jails.

    This struggle had opened up in California last fall after Gov. Arnold
    Schwarzenegger announced drastic cuts. How did it become a
    country-wide action?

    It piqued interest when people saw large numbers of California
    students willing to fight. When education workers joined this struggle
    it provided the push needed to call out people from other parts of the
    country to defend their rights to education. It couldn’t have happened
    without the young people in California, where this struggle is most
    advanced.

    We first raised the idea of a national demonstration at a Workers
    World Party conference in November, at a FIST workshop with 75
    students and youths. We had to win people over to the idea, but by the end of the workshop activists there from other organizations picked up the idea with enthusiasm.

    We talked to students from CUNY, from Students for Educational Rights at CCNY, the CUNY Campaign to Defend Education; to national leaders of Students for a Democratic Society; to Students Taking Action to Reclaim Education at the University of Maryland and Connecticut Students Against the War.

    From then it grew toward a national conference call with 42 people in
    December. We had found out before that California had planned to call a March 4 statewide action and we successfully motivated that same date for a national action, which was in solidarity with the
    California action and complementary to it. It was clear that the
    action had potential.

    What role did FIST play in building the demonstration?

    FIST mobilized actively behind the March 4 national action, playing an
    especially strong role in New York City, North Carolina, Detroit,
    Cleveland and Boston. Connecticut SAW took on building a Web site, and we used the Internet to spread the world. But you can’t build an action like this with the Internet alone.

    We issued a national call when the California organizations issued
    their statewide call, making both calls public around the same time.

    I personally traveled and spoke to college and high-school students
    and other youths in Boston, Michigan, North Carolina, Baltimore and
    around New York. Everywhere I went, the high-school and college
    students and their parents were all for it. There was a mood to
    struggle and a need to do it based on the cuts they all were facing.

    What was the role of teachers, other workers and the community?

    The Professional Staff Congress at CUNY, K-12 organizations like
    Teachers for a Just Contract and Grassroots Education Movement in New York; and other organizations of community leaders and educators, like Coalition for Public Education, also were enthusiastic and did a lot of organizing. The powerful Transport Workers Union here had demands that complemented those of the high-school students.

    Many students and youth, who may not now be working, come from
    working-class families and know their future is as workers — if there
    are jobs. Most youths value their teachers. They don’t want their
    teachers to lose their jobs or get pay cuts. There was a lot of mutual
    solidarity.

    FIST encouraged this solidarity in our literature and organizing, but
    the economic crisis was the objective basis for solidarity. Teachers
    saw the rebellious students as allies. There is even more reason for
    there to be mutual solidarity as the attacks continue and the movement grows.

    In New York, for example, the move to eliminate student passes on
    subways and buses creates a basis for solidarity between the youths
    and the workers in the Transport Workers Union, who are threatened
    with layoffs.

    Police tried to pen in the marching youth as they approached the TWU rally at Fashion Institute of Technology. What happened then?

    Even as we marched along Lexington Avenue, police tried to confine the marchers to the sidewalk. There wasn’t enough room. We stopped and said we would stay there if we didn’t get the streets. The marchers started shouting, “Whose streets? Our streets.” The police negotiator decided to cede the streets to the marchers.

    Near FIT, the youths chanted, “We want unity” with the TWU. The police tried to surround the marchers. Some TWU workers began arguing with the police, saying they wanted the students with the workers. Finally we suggested the students go around the barricades and across the streets to the rally at FIT. Some, who the police blocked with mopeds, managed to cross Seventh Avenue and then cross back to rejoin the rally. They refused to be penned in.

    What’s next?

    Since March 4 we’ve gotten lots of email messages saying we need to keep the momentum up and call for another day of national action.
    That’s under discussion.

    The May 1 Coalition had participated in our last three meetings in
    NYC. Many students look to that action, not only to support the
    initiative of the workers and especially the many immigrant workers in the coalition, but also to include demands from the student movement in the May 1 protest at Union Square.

    The students see the need to join with the workers. The May 1
    Coalition workers saw the strength of the student movement. We are
    hoping that the upsurge of the student movement will give a further
    push to May 1 in 2010, along with the immigrant and other workers.

    There may be lots of local actions too. In some states there were lots
    of arrests — in University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, in California,
    some in New York, in Texas — and there will be actions in solidarity
    with the arrested students.

    Our next conference call will decide the exact next step. What we saw
    on March 4 is the desire of young people to revitalize a movement of
    young students and workers. We plan to go forward in the militant
    spirit of the March 4 actions to the next steps in the struggle for
    education and jobs — for youths and for all workers.
    ——————————————————————————–
    Articles copyright 1995-2010 Workers World. Verbatim copying and
    distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without
    royalty provided this notice is preserved.

    Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
    Email: [email protected]
    Page printed from:
    http://www.workers.org/2010/us/hales_0318/

  • AFL-CIO Passes Resolution Against Obama’s Endorsement of Mass Firing of Rhode Island Teachers

    Unions Plan Political Work Despite Strained Relations With Obama

    By David Moberg
    In These Times
    March 2010

    After Obama earlier this week supported the
    mass firing of 93 teachers and other staff at the
    troubled Central Falls High School in Rhode Island, the
    AFL-CIO executive council, already meeting in Orlando,
    fired off an unusually harsh resolution.

    Labor leaders said they were “appalled” by the
    “unacceptable” and “disappointing” presidential
    statements, especially since the local superintendent
    fired the teachers rather than negotiate over how to
    continue the recent academic improvement at the working-
    class community’s school.

    It was a mini-PATCO moment-echoing faintly President
    Reagan’s decision to fire striking air traffic
    controllers-in the increasingly frayed relations between
    organized labor and a president who has at times seemed
    distant from the labor movement, yet at other times
    seemed more pro-union than any president in many
    decades.

    AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka said Obama’s comment
    was “a bad call” based on “wrong facts,” but that it
    happened at all caused him “concern, deep concern.”

    Union reaction to the administration is increasingly
    ambivalent. Partly it reflects frustration-mainly in not
    getting adequate legislation passed to deal with the
    multiple crises of working Americans (jobs, incomes,
    health care, worker rights and more).

    But that unease is tempered by satisfaction-mainly in
    administrative actions.

    This complex relationship was on display with two
    speeches to the executive council-both somewhat
    defensive, if not apologetic. Vice-president Joe Biden
    was received lukewarmly with pointed questions about
    broad administration policy afterwards. Labor Secretary

    Hilda Solis received a much more enthusiastic reception,
    partly as a result of her efforts to enforce existing
    laws better and to develop more pro-worker regulations
    (such as on occupational safety and health).

    Labor leaders know their frustration primarily stems
    from Republican obstruction, right-wing demagoguery, and
    the anti-democratic rules of the Senate. (Asked if the
    theoretically bipartisan labor movement would endorse
    any Republicans this year, Trumka said, “We’re hoping.
    None come to mind at this point.”)

    But the unreliability of a significant bloc of
    conservative Democrats slowed or stopped progress even
    when the Democrats could claim the magic number-60-in
    the Senate. In a plan first hatched by a group of big
    unions from the AFL-CIO and Change to Win several weeks
    ago, organized labor-from the state federation to the
    AFL-CIO threw its support behind Arkansas Lt. Gov. Bill
    Halter in a primary challenge against Sen. Blanche
    Lincoln, a Democratic nemesis of unions. Communications
    Workers, Service Employees (SEIU), AFSCME (public
    workers), and the Steelworkers each pledged $1 million
    for his campaign.

    Lincoln, known as the Senator from Wal-Mart, rejected
    labor law reform, opposed the public option in health
    care reform, and refused to vote for cloture on the
    appointment of labor lawyer Craig Becker to the National
    Labor Relations Board. Halter is no labor tribune: he
    says he doesn’t support the original labor law reform
    involving majority sign-up, but leans to a compromise
    that would hold NLRB representation elections more
    quickly.

    But “maybe something like this will send a message” to
    other Democrats, says AFSCME president Gerald McEntee.
    “I think it does represent a new strategy. We’re going
    to take into consideration records on issues facing the
    people. There’s always the danger [of losing a
    Democratic seat]-we do want to support Democrats-but
    when people are as recalcitrant as this, you have to do
    something or you’re not a labor movement.”

    There are other ways to deliver the same message.
    McEntee says the AFL-CIO coordinated political program
    will be even bigger this year than in the 2008
    presidential election (partly because it will be
    necessary to spend heavily in some normally blue states
    like California and Illinois to erect a firewall
    protecting vulnerable Democratic seats). But AFL-CIO
    political director Karen Ackerman says that despite that
    effort many Democrats may not get a labor endorsement or
    get an endorsement with no money. “Those who’ve not
    proven themselves will not get our support,” she says.

    Union leaders-and likely many members and other workers-
    are upset with a variety of Obama policy choices, such
    as dropping the public option and imposing an excise tax
    on high-cost health insurance policies (and were
    disappointed even with the improvements Trumka and other
    negotiated) or going easy on the big banks. (As blogger
    Michael Whitney noted, there were no mass firings of
    bankers.)

    But people’s biggest frustration, especially among the
    broader base of Obama voters, is that so little is
    getting accomplished and that-even if Republicans and
    blue dogs and filibusters are largely at fault-that
    Obama doesn’t seem to be fighting hard enough. “People
    get demoralized when they don’t have a vehicle to fight
    back,” Ackerman says. Or when their representatives
    don’t fight, adds UNITE HERE (hotel and restaurant
    workers) president John Wilhelm . “There’s no fight
    visible to the average worker,” he says.

    Demoralization will make it harder to mobilize the Obama
    voters this fall, even though the union political
    operation is much more effective than in 1994, when
    union member and working class disillusionment with Bill
    Clinton’s NAFTA deal and his health insurance reform
    failure helped Republicans take control of the House.

    Yet Wilhelm says, “It will be extremely tough. Our folks
    are seriously disappointed not to see significant
    changes since the Democrats took control. That was the
    promise. Especially the response to the job problem has
    been so anemic….Our members may not vote for
    reactionaries, but they may not vote.”

    “I think Rich Trumka is right,” Wilhelm continues. “The
    conversation has to be about jobs.” And the plan this
    year, far more than ever, McEntee says, is to lead into
    the election battle with an issues fight over job
    creation, including taxing the financial services
    industry both to pay for reconstructing the jobs and
    economy its executives destroyed and to discourage
    speculation over investment in the future.

    Winning that fight means pushing the president and many
    Democratic lawmakers and officials beyond where they
    want to go as well as defeating Republicans. At a time
    when even many union members are disillusioned, and
    right-wing scare tactics are powerful, the political
    challenge for organized labor this year is extraordinary.

  • Zimbabwe Thirty Years After National Independence

    Zimbabwe Thirty Years After National Independence

    Indigenization and Gender Equality on Agenda

    By Abayomi Azikiwe
    Editor, Pan-African News Wire
    News Analysis

    Against all odds the Southern African nation of Zimbabwe is celebrating its 30th year of independence from British settler colonialism. In February and early March of 1980, nationwide elections were held inside the former Rhodesia, named after racist colonialist Cecil Rhodes, in which the two leading national liberation movements, the Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF) and the Zimbabwe African People’s Union-Patriotic Front (ZAPU-PF), won the overwhelming majority of votes leading to the recognition by the international community of an independent state on April 18 of that same year.

    The elections grew out of a 14-year armed struggle waged by the African majority against the Rhodesian state headed by Prime Minister Ian Smith. After tremendous gains were made in the national liberation war during the late 1970s, the imperialist states of the U.S. and Britain pressured the Smith regime to negotiate an end to the war.

    These talks held in December 1979 resulted in what became known as the Lancaster House Agreements. A ceasefire was declared and 16,500 guerrillas from the Zimbabwe African National Liberation Army (ZANLA), which was the armed wing of ZANU-PF and 5,500 fighters from the Zimbabwe African People’s Revolutionary Army (ZIPRA), the military section of ZAPU-PF, returned to the country.

    The survival of Zimbabwe as an independent country committed to the empowerment of the African majority as well as an anti-imperialist foreign policy, is a testament to the unity and fortitude of the ZANU-PF party which merged with ZAPU-PF in late 1987. Over the last decade, since the imposition of the Third Chimurenga, a radical land reform policy that seized control of half of the farm land previously controlled by white settlers even after national independence, the western imperialist states have enacted sanctions against the country and its leadership.

    Over the last twelve years, since the land redistribution process became national policy in 1998, the governments of Britain, United States and the European Union (EU) have taken hostile measures against Zimbabwe. During 2000, after much political discussion and debate, revolutionary war veterans took control of hundreds of farms operated by British settlers who held both Zimbabwean and U.K. citizenship.

    After 2000, the imperialist interference in the internal affairs of Zimbabwe became apparent. In that year, an election held in June witnessed the wholesale financing and political support by western interests and local capitalists of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC). Although ZANU-PF maintained its majority in the national government, the opposition utilized its electoral gains to further push for the regime-change policies of the U.K. and U.S. administrations.

    Zimbabwe’s leaders were banned from traveling to various European countries and the United States during this period. The U.S. under George W. Bush, unsuccessfully attempted to pressure the African National Congress-led government in South Africa to cut off electrical supplies to Zimbabwe and to refuse to allow goods to enter the country.

    In 2002, when ZANU-PF won an overwhelming victory in the national elections, the sanctions imposed by the imperialists intensified. By 2008, the national currency was in a free fall and the country was under fire by the western states who sought to add more sanctions against the Zimbabwe government.

    Nonetheless, the ZANU-PF government maintained its unity and forced the opposition MDC, which had by then split into two factions, to enter into negotiations for the creation of a Global Political Agreement and a national coalition government. The MDC-Tsvangirai boycotted the presidential elections in June 2008 after it had won a narrow majority in the parliamentary poll earlier that year.

    The realization of the GPA was a major victory for the government of President Mugabe. Since the western imperialist states were saying that ZANU-PF should be removed from power, the appointment of opposition leaders Morgan Tsvangirai and Arthur Mutambara as Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister of the coalition government created the conditions for the Zimbabwe state to demand the immediate lifting of sanctions against the country.

    However, the sanctions and political attacks on President Mugabe and ZANU-PF have continued. The United States under the Obama administration and Britain led by Gordon Brown have maintained the sanctions against the government.

    South African President Jacob Zuma traveled to Britain in early March and demanded that sanctions be lifted. The Brown government in the U.K. refused to consider this request and called for the Zimbabwe government to make greater concessions to western imperialist interests before this economic war would be ended.

    Zimbabwe Domestic and Foreign Policy in the Current Period

    During the process of attempted isolation and regime change in Zimbabwe, the country has intensified its relations with neighboring states including the Republic of South Africa, and other members of the regional Southern African Development Community (SADC). In 2008, in contravention to the pressures exerted by the U.S. and Britain, the African Union meeting in Egypt reaffirmed its support for the government’s efforts to reach a political settlement with the opposition MDC-T in which the Republic of South Africa was the principal mediator.

    In addition, Zimbabwe enhanced its economic and political cooperation with the People’s Republic of China, whose socialist government extended credits and trade agreements that bolstered the national economy of the country. China was also instrumental in blocking several attempts to pass resolutions against Zimbabwe before the United Nations Security Council.

    In January a new series of agreements between Zimbabwe and the PRC were signed involving projects in the national steel, pharmaceutical and fertilizer industries. Government officials from both countries reached a Memorandum of Understanding for financing these projects.

    According to the Zimbabwe Herald, Ziscosteel is one of the companies on the West’s illegal sanctions list, a development that has constrained its operations. Officials from the Ministry of Finance, representatives from China’s Eximbank and Sinosure, a Chinese State enterprise, signed the deals in Harare on January 27.” (Zimbabwe Herald, January 28, 2010)

    This agreement was further explained by pointing out that “The first phase of the program will see Eximbank financing fertilizer supply, medicines and water chemicals for the City of Harare. The team paid a courtesy call on Vice-President Joice Mujuru after the deals were sealed. “

    Mujuru stated at the occasion that “Your visit is most welcome because of the results brought about by this meeting. Zimbabwe is happy with the readiness by your Government to appreciate the difficulties we have been encountering, particularly in the past 10 years. “

    The Vice-President of Zimbabwe continued by acknowledging the critical role China is playing in combating the economic crisis facing the Southern African nation. “I am glad that you have agreed to reschedule the debt. This will enable us to solve some of the problems that we have been facing regarding the loan repayment.” (Zimbabwe Herald, January 28)

    In regard to domestic economic policy, the government has emphasized “indigenization” of local industries. The Minister of Youth, Indigenization and Empowerment Saviour Kasukuwere said that the aim is to achieve sustainable development of the national economy and to fight poverty among the majority African population.

    An article in the Zimbabwe Herald recently pointed out that “The indigenization regulations require companies to—within the next three months—explain how they intend to fulfill the requirements of the law on empowerment and to have 51 percent ownership by blacks in the next five years.” (Zimbabwe Herald, March 8)

    Minister Kasukuwere continued by stating that the Government had made progress in the areas of social issues, including health and education since independence in 1980 but had achieved little in the area of participation and ownership in the mainstream economy. The official noted that the western initiated sanctions were still negatively impacting the country because the economy was foreign-run and dominated.

    “We are under sanctions and these sanctions work because the economy is in the hands of foreigners, Kasukuwere said. He also illustrated the role of the western media by saying that “Journalists are being asked to write hate stories about their country and surprisingly they write as many stories as they can falsifying some facts in a bid to find negative stories about their country.” (Zimbabwe Herald, March 8)

    Efforts to Achieve Gender Equality Through the Revised Constitution

    The nation of Zimbabwe is also undergoing a process of formulating a new constitution resulting from the Global Political Agreement between ZANU-PF and the two MDC parties. In a recent article by Biata Beatrice Nyamupinga, who is the chairperson of the Zimbabwean Women Parliamentary Caucus and a ZANU-PF Member of Parliament, she cites that “with 52 percent of its population being women, it is paramount and legitimate that women participate in this process as respected and equal citizens.” (Zimbabwe Herald, March 8)

    Nyamupinga indicated that the country must work toward 50 percent representation for women within governmental structures. This policy is in line with the regional SADC Protocol on Gender and Development, which was adopted by the Zimbabwe Parliament on October 23, 2009.

    “However, as women have already argued, it is quite evident that they are underrepresented in the management structures of the constitution-making process,” Nyamupinga said. The level of women’s participation in the process stands at 16 percent.

    The ZANU-PF Member of Parliament continues by pointing out that the “Women’s Caucus expresses gratitude to Vice President Joice Mujuru and Deputy Prime Minister Thokozani Khupe for coming out forcefully to seeing to it that women representation is effected within the constitution-making process management structures.” (Zimbabwe Herald, March 8)

    At a January meeting held of the ZANU-PF Women’s League, the national secretary of the organization, Oppah Muchinguri, also noted that the country is obligated to reach the 50-50 representation in decision-making as mandated by the SADC protocols. Muchinguri announced that a two week induction course would prepare women party activists to ensure the achievement of these goals.

    “We will also walk them through various achievements the League has made since independence and the effects of sanctions on ordinary persons. It is also in this context that we are urging the MDC-T to tell the West to remove sanctions,” she said.

    The ZANU-PF Women’s League secretary for information Monica Mutsvangwa also said that they were demanding that the sanctions be lifted. She pointed out that “David Miliband, the British Foreign Secretary has finally owned up to the imposition of illegal sanctions on Zimbabwe.” ( Zimbabwe Herald, January 31)

    Mutsvangwa also emphasized that “The ZANU-PF Women’s League appeals to Britain, the European Union and the United States to remove the sanctions. We call for a new chapter in Africa-Europe relations.”

    The ZANU-PF Women’s League secretary for information also said that “For the first 15 years of independence, we went through the bliss of hard won freedom. We saw our country make great progress in all human indices of progress as we filled our granaries. Alas our respite from pain and suffering was short-lived. Soon after we embarked on the land reform program the West imposed sanctions.”

    Dr. Olivia Muchena, the Zimbabwe Minister of Women’s Affairs, Gender and Community Development stated in a recent lecture inside the country that “with adequate support, women could contribute significantly to the turnaround of the country’s economic fortunes. (Ziana News Agency, February 2)

  • U.S. Says It Will Assist With Offensive Against Resistance Forces in Somalia

    U.S. Says It Will Assist in Offensive Against Resistance Forces in Somalia

    Imperialists pledge aerial bombardments in attempt to crush opposition forces

    By Abayomi Azikiwe
    Editor, Pan-African News Wire
    News Analysis

    A recent statement issued by the Obama administration indicates that it is planning to carry out aerial bombardments in the Horn of Africa nation of Somalia. The announcement comes amid intense fighting in the capital of Mogadishu between the two Islamic resistance movements, Al Shabaab and Hizbul Islam and the U.S.-backed Transitional Federal Government that is ruling the country.

    It is broadly acknowledged that the TFG only controls a small section of the capital having conceded other areas in Mogadishu and throughout the south and central regions of the country to both resistance organizations. The U.S. in financing the presence of a African Union peacekeeping force known as AMISOM which consists of approximately 5,000 troops from the pro-western regimes of Uganda and Burundi.

    Complicating matters further, there has been growing hostility between Hizbul Islam and Al Shabab, resulting in clashes over the control of the southern port city of Kismayo. Hizbul Islam has stated its willingness to engage in dialogue with Al Shabaab but has refused to hold negotiations with the TFG headed by Sheikh Shariff Sheikh Ahmed.

    Sheikh Ibrahim Bare Mohammed, the Deputy Commander in the Bandir region for Hizbul Islam, pledged to retain control of the areas occupied by his organization . “We are controlling many parts of Mogadishu and we will defend these areas because we are already here.”

    The Hizbul Islam official continued by saying that ‘”We cannot accept our enemy controlling this region and we are not afraid of the American government. We will defeat any attack from the Somali government.” (Garowe Online, March 8)

    U.S. officials have said that “What you are likely to see is air strikes and Special Ops moving in, hitting and getting out.”(Garowe Online, March 8) The Obama administration has continued the same policy carried out against Somalia by the previous regime of George W. Bush.

    Gen. Mohamed Gelle Kahiya, the recently appointed commander of the TFG military, confirmed that the U.S. would be involved in the offensive. The Obama administration, just like its predecessors, views the nation of Somalia as strategic to imperialist interests.

    According to the New York Times in an article on March 5, “The United States is increasingly concerned about the link between Somalia and Yemen, a growing extremist hot spot, with fighters going back and forth across the Red Sea in what one Somali watcher described as an ‘Al Qaeda exchange program.” (NYT, March 5)

    In order to minimize casualties and exact maximum damage to the Somali people, the U.S. Special Forces are training and coordinating the TFG to stage ground operations while they are involved in bombings from the air and offshore. “This is not an American offensive,” says U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Johnnie Carson. “The U.S. military is not on the ground in Somalia. Full stop.”

    However, the New York Times reports in the March 5 article that “The Americans have provided covert training to Somali intelligence officers, logistical support to the peacekeepers, fuel for the maneuvers, surveillance information about insurgent positions and money for the bullets and guns.”

    This same articles continues saying that “Washington is also using its heft as the biggest supplier of humanitarian aid to Somalia to encourage private aid agencies to move quickly into ‘new liberated areas’ and deliver services like food and medicine to the beleaguered Somali people in an effort to make the government more popular.”

    The Obama administration has increased U.S. military assistance to Somalia over the last several months. The New York Times admits that during 2009, when the TFG was on the verge of collapse, the U.S. sent in millions of dollars in weapons.

    In addition to the Obama administration’s commitment to launch military strikes against Somalia, the activity of various European imperialist states and Canada, are designed to increase pressure on the resistance forces in the country.

    On March 5, European Union Naval spokesperson Commander John Harbour revealed that his forces have anticipated a spike in so-called piracy attacks off the coast of Somalia in the Gulf of Aden.

    “We know they’re coming,” said Harbour. “We’re taking the fight to the pirates.” (Associated Press, March 5)

    On the same day the French frigate Nivose reported seizing 35 “pirates” in three days off the coast of Somalia. In four operations between March 1-5, eleven people were reported taken into French custody with the assistance of a Spanish maritime airplane that was engaged in the European Union military mission in the region.

    The EU initiated what it calls the “Atalanta Anti-Piracy Mission” in December 2008 in a concerted plan with the U.S., NATO and other countries to guarantee safe passage for vessels traveling through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean, which is noted as the busiest shipping lane in the world.

    However, despite this massive build-up over the last 15 months, it has not eliminated attacks on ships by Somalis seeking compensation from firms for use of the waterways. In April of 2009, the U.S. Navy shot dead three Somali teenagers who had held a U.S. boat in the Gulf of Aden. One 16-year-old was taken into custody and is awaiting trial in New York City charged with crimes under U.S. law.

    Somalia and the “War on Terrorism”

    In preparation for the upcoming offensive against Al Shabaab and Hizbul Islam in Somalia, the Canadian, British and U.S. governments have taken measures against expatriates living in these imperialist states. Canada has agreed to list Al Shabaab as a “terrorist group” purportedly to prevent the organization from raising funds inside the country.

    In a March 8 statement, Vic Toews, Canada’s Minister of Public Safety stated that “This government is determined that terrorist groups do not receive support from Canadian sources.” (WIC, March 8) The Canadian authorities have announced that anyone convicted of aiding the Somali resistance organization will be guilty of a criminal offense.

    The government of the U.K. is taking similar action against Al Shabaab, claiming that the Somali group is connected to Al Qaeda. “I have today laid an order which, subject to parliamentary approval, will proscribe Al Shabaab. Proscription is a tough but necessary power to tackle terrorism and is not a course of action we take lightly,” according to Home Secretary Alan Johnson. (Reuters, March 3)

    In the United States, a man was recently brought to New York City in order to face charges of assisting a foreign “terrorist” organization. The indictment unsealed on March 8 claims that Mohamed Ibrahim Ahmed had traveled to Somalia in April 2009 and was trained at an Al Shabaab camp.

    Al Shabaab has been designated by the U.S. as a “terrorist” organization.

    In 1992, the administration of George H.W. Bush sent thousands of U.S. Marines into Somalia under the banner of United Nations Mission “Restore Hope.” Over the next 18 months, Somali resistance forces fought the U.S. military which engaged in brutal acts of occupation and aggression against the people.

    As a result of the losses by U.S. military forces, the Clinton administration withdrew from the country. After 2001, Somalia became a central focus of the so-called “war on terrorism” which is really designed to establish U.S. imperialist control over the Horn of Africa region and the surrounding waterways.

    In 2006, the U.S. administration of George W. Bush, financed and coordinated a military invasion by the pro-western government in neighboring Ethiopia. Most of the Ethiopian soldiers withdrew in January 2009 but have periodically entered the border regions to carry out operations against the resistance forces of Al Shabaab.

  • Nigerian Acting President Fires National Security Adviser Over Mass Killings in Jos

    Jonathan fires NSA over Jos mayhem

    Nigeria Vanguard
    Headlines Mar 9, 2010

    *Aliyu Gusau is new Security Adviser *400 victims get mass burial *UN, Vatican mourn, appeal for calm

    By Taye Obateru & Emmanuel Aziken

    ABUJA— THE Jos crisis which led to the death of about 400 people on Sunday, has led to the sacking of the National Security Adviser, Sarki Mukhtar, by the Acting President, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan.

    To replace him is Aliyu Gusau, a one time National Security Adviser to former President, Olusegun Obasanjo.

    Meantime, about 400 corpses of the victims of Sunday’s massacre were, yesterday, given a mass burial at Dogon Na Hauwa village in Jos South Local Government Area of Plateau State amid tears and wailings.

    This emerged as, former Head of State, General Yakubu Gowon, said there was no alternative to dialogue in resolution of conflicts. He spoke at a peace conference on the recurring crisis in Jos.

    Strong stench of decomposing human bodies permeated the air as the bodies were removed from the truck which conveyed them to the burial site. An elderly man collapsed and had to be revived on sighting the bodies lined up in the mass grave. He was later led away from the scene by some of his relations.

    The burial was preceded by a funeral service at the village square where various clerics preached on the need for all to accept what has happened as the will of God.

    State Commissioner for Works and Transport who headed the Rescue and Recovery Committee said three mass graves were dug for the bodies.

    He said about 380 were being buried at Dogon Na Hauwa while about 36 corpses would be buried in the two other graves. According to him, some of the bereaved made their own burial arrangements.

    Police arrest 96 over the massacre

    Meanwhile the Plateau State Police Command said that about 96 persons had been arrested over the massacre, with the Police spokesman, Mohammed Lerama, indicating in a statement, that four of the fleeing Fulanis were shot dead by the security men.

    Speaking at the workshop on peace organized by the Institute for Governance and Social Research, Gowon lamented that the peaceful nature for which Plateau was known had been disrupted. He said the issues must be addressed honestly to resolve the problem.

    While reiterating his commitment to one indivisible country, Gowon recalled that it was this commitment that made him resort to the use of force to keep the country one during the civil war.

    He said: “Those who know me know that I have been on the side of peaceful resolution of all conflicts. If you will recall, as head of state, I did all that was possible to secure a peaceful resolution of the Nigerian crisis in the second half of the 1960s. Unfortunately, due to circumstances beyond my control, I had to use force to preserve the unity of our nation.”

    Second Republic President, Alhaji Shehu Shagari, regretted that present leaders of the country were not doing enough to sustain the unity of the country which former leaders stood and fought for.

    He lamented: “if past national leaders fought to keep the unity of this country like Gowon did and late J.S Tarkar fought to keep the Middle Belt one, what are the present leaders doing to sustain the unity of Nigeria and Middle Belt?”

    The conference was almost disrupted by pandemonium in the town following rumour of an outbreak of violence in some parts. This led to shut down of business houses and schools as people ran helter-skelter and scampered to their homes. However, there was calm after a while as people went about their businesses with most shops remaining shut throughout the day.

    Troops deployed

    Authorities deployed troops to arrest the marauding gangs that rampaged across villages near the city centre, where hundreds died in clashes early this year. Under fire for failing to prevent another outburst of sectarian violence, authorities said they had arrested scores of people in connection with the attacks.

    Agency reports said that Muslim residents of the villages had been warned by phone text messages, two days prior to the attack, so they could make good their escape.

    Dozens of university students, yesterday, carried placards outside a Jos hotel where several former heads of state and the state government held a peace conference.

    Placards read: ‘We want peace in Plateau State’ and ‘Say no to genocide’.

    In Bukuru and Dadin Kowa on the fringes of Jos, police fired warning shots to disperse protesters and rounded up youths trying to demonstrate, according to a police source.

    Witnesses meanwhile described how victims in Sunday’s three-hour systematic orgy of violence, mainly women and children, were caught in animal traps and fishing nets as they tried to flee attackers who hacked them to death.

    Vatican expresses sadness, concern

    The Vatican, yesterday, lamented “horrible acts of violence” committed by machete-wielding gangs. Vatican spokesman, Federico Lombardi, told a news agency that the church reacted with “sadness and concern” to the violence in Jos, blaming it on Muslim pastoralists.

    Asked to comment on the nature of the conflict, Lombardi deferred to Nigerian church authorities. The Archbishop of Abuja, John Onaiyekan, told Vatican Radio, yesterday, that the violence was rooted not in religion but in social, economic, tribal and cultural differences.

    Ban Ki-moon appeals for calm

    The United Nations Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon, also appealed for “maximum restraint” amid revulsion at the slaughter of more than 500 Christians, as survivors told how the killers chopped down their victims.

    Survivors said the attackers were able to separate the Fulanis from members of the rival Berom group by chanting ‘nagge’, the Fulani word for cattle. Those who failed to respond in the same language were hacked to death.

    One report said the gangs shouted Allahu Akhbar before breaking into homes and setting them alight in the early hours of Sunday. Churches were among the buildings that were burnt down. Ban told reporters he was “deeply concerned,” adding: “I appeal to all concerned to exercise maximum restraint.”

    200 hospitalized after attack – Plateau govt

    The Plateau State Information Commissioner, Gregory Yenlong, who gave details of the attacks said more than 200 people had been hospitalized in Jos.

    He said: “Most of the survivors are … receiving treatment. Over 200 are admitted in hospitals in Jos. People were attacked with axes, daggers and cutlasses – many of them children, the aged and pregnant women. Churches, houses and food stores were torched and crops were slashed with cutlasses.”

    Atiku seeks improved intelligence gathering

    Meantime, former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, has tasked security agencies in the country to improve their intelligence gathering mechanism to be able to prevent the frequent massacre of innocent people in internal conflicts in the country.

    Condemning the weekend killings in Jos, Plateau State in a statement, yesterday, Atiku called on the government to bring the perpetrators of what he described as a massacre to book.

    He said: “Such horrific massacre of innocent people, especially women and children, has assumed a disturbing trend in the country and all those behind it must be prosecuted. Such killings dehumanize all of us. Nigerian security forces must review and overhaul their intelligence gathering capability to be able to nip in the bud this sort of wanton loss of lives and property.”

    Atiku who said he was worried by the culture of impunity and brazenness with which these crimes were being committed, stressed that both the Federal Government and the Plateau State Government must do every thing possible to protect the lives of the people.